mrmojorisin75

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far getting utterly bummed. What? He's clearly set us up to play on the deck rather than Pardew's hoofball. howay man Look, we've been s****, but this "McCarvdew" bollocks is just lazy. We've clearly tried to play it out from the back. Hasn't worked, mind. Explain to me how other than us getting a 4/5/6-0 bumming he's differed from Pardew so far. Eh, I just told you. We've tried to keep the ball on the deck to a greater extent rather than hoofing it at every opportunity. We've also tried different systems and approaches to games too, rather than just one plan every single time. We started last season with a 'new approach' as well if you recall. Knocked it about on the ground without any aim or purpose. Sound familiar? I don't remember Pardew trying to tailor different plans for different games, no. He tried one thing for a few matches and retreated to what he knew. You say it like it's working though It's clearly not working. But that wasn't what you were saying. What I said was other than avoiding bummings he's so far done nothing different to Pardew and I stand by it. It was countered with but we've passed it a bit more, to which I replied that's what we did last season too, just as aimlessly. Pardew even dropped little Vurn and kept Colback So the only positive or thing he's done differently is try different systems, which is only partially true, and none of the changes have worked either. Therefore in conclusion, from what I can see, he's tried different systems that don't work. That's it. That's what sets him apart from Pardew at this point. Good stuff.

So clever with the ball. Just such a heady player. Takes up great positions and does the right things at the right time. Fantastic. Playing like he's been there a year. Was considered shit on his debut iirc. He was a bit powder puff last week against the scum tbf, but he looks like he's finding his feet in the premier. He was a constant threat today, linking up the play really nicely. Aye this is what I was getting at. He's played two games, first (debut) he played badly and was shit, scored against some tripe in Europe and then today so now he's good. Margins.

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far getting utterly bummed. What? He's clearly set us up to play on the deck rather than Pardew's hoofball. howay man Look, we've been s****, but this "McCarvdew" bollocks is just lazy. We've clearly tried to play it out from the back. Hasn't worked, mind. Explain to me how other than us getting a 4/5/6-0 bumming he's differed from Pardew so far. Eh, I just told you. We've tried to keep the ball on the deck to a greater extent rather than hoofing it at every opportunity. We've also tried different systems and approaches to games too, rather than just one plan every single time. We started last season with a 'new approach' as well if you recall. Knocked it about on the ground without any aim or purpose. Sound familiar? I don't remember Pardew trying to tailor different plans for different games, no. He tried one thing for a few matches and retreated to what he knew. You say it like it's working though

Sissoko-3 That's because apparently it looked like he didn't care.Unfortunately there are plenty of mongs in St James who will swallow this sort of bullshit. It actually annoys me how many fans seem to not rate Sissoko. Typed Sissoko into the search bar of twitter yesterday and the abuse he gets on what I thought was a very good performance is amazing. Hope he leaves and proves those mongs wrong Yesterday was the first decent game he played since Southampton. He's never decisive, never influences a game so much that we might win it (since his first couple of games). I think one player playing a big part in creating two great chances(Janmaat goal and Cisse sitter) is influencing a game that we might win it As stated, 6 games 2 decent performances if you're generous. I don't like what he's got tbh. He was way better than decent yesterday like Fine, if you're that hard for him. 1 better than decent performance, 1 decent performance, 4 piles of shit.

So clever with the ball. Just such a heady player. Takes up great positions and does the right things at the right time. Fantastic. Playing like he's been there a year. Was considered shit on his debut iirc. By Spurs fans? By everyone. Cause they didn't win. These are the margins. Mitro was sent off in his first couple of games so he's basically now only worth being a cellmate with Sutcliffe.

Sissoko-3 That's because apparently it looked like he didn't care.Unfortunately there are plenty of mongs in St James who will swallow this sort of bullshit. It actually annoys me how many fans seem to not rate Sissoko. Typed Sissoko into the search bar of twitter yesterday and the abuse he gets on what I thought was a very good performance is amazing. Hope he leaves and proves those mongs wrong Yesterday was the first decent game he played since Southampton. He's never decisive, never influences a game so much that we might win it (since his first couple of games). I think one player playing a big part in creating two great chances(Janmaat goal and Cisse sitter) is influencing a game that we might win it As stated, 6 games 2 decent performances if you're generous. I don't like what he's got tbh. He was way better than decent yesterday like Fine, if you're that hard for him. 1 better than decent performance, 1 decent performance, 4 piles of shit.

Sending off has hurt us so much like.

So clever with the ball. Just such a heady player. Takes up great positions and does the right things at the right time. Fantastic. Playing like he's been there a year. Was considered shit on his debut iirc.

TCD deserves it all imo mind.

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far getting utterly bummed. What? He's clearly set us up to play on the deck rather than Pardew's hoofball. howay man Look, we've been s****, but this "McCarvdew" bollocks is just lazy. We've clearly tried to play it out from the back. Hasn't worked, mind. Explain to me how other than us getting a 4/5/6-0 bumming he's differed from Pardew so far. Eh, I just told you. We've tried to keep the ball on the deck to a greater extent rather than hoofing it at every opportunity. We've also tried different systems and approaches to games too, rather than just one plan every single time. We started last season with a 'new approach' as well if you recall. Knocked it about on the ground without any aim or purpose. Sound familiar?

This will be two losses for Palace aye? Let's be having a classic Pardew trough pls

Sissoko-3 That's because apparently it looked like he didn't care.Unfortunately there are plenty of mongs in St James who will swallow this sort of bullshit. It actually annoys me how many fans seem to not rate Sissoko. Typed Sissoko into the search bar of twitter yesterday and the abuse he gets on what I thought was a very good performance is amazing. Hope he leaves and proves those mongs wrong Yesterday was the first decent game he played since Southampton. He's never decisive, never influences a game so much that we might win it (since his first couple of games). I think one player playing a big part in creating two great chances(Janmaat goal and Cisse sitter) is influencing a game that we might win it As stated, 6 games 2 decent performances if you're generous. I don't like what he's got tbh.

Sissoko-3 That's because apparently it looked like he didn't care.Unfortunately there are plenty of mongs in St James who will swallow this sort of bullshit. It actually annoys me how many fans seem to not rate Sissoko. Typed Sissoko into the search bar of twitter yesterday and the abuse he gets on what I thought was a very good performance is amazing. Hope he leaves and proves those mongs wrong Yesterday was the first decent game he played since Southampton. He's never decisive, never influences a game so much that we might win it (since his first couple of games).

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far getting utterly bummed. What? He's clearly set us up to play on the deck rather than Pardew's hoofball. howay man Look, we've been shite, but this "McCarvdew" bollocks is just lazy. We've clearly tried to play it out from the back. Hasn't worked, mind. Explain to me how other than us getting a 4/5/6-0 bumming he's differed from Pardew so far. In some respects I'd argue he's been worse. Pardew could see a winner when it feel in his lap yet McLaren is ignoring Aarons and Perez as long as he can.

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far getting utterly bummed. What? He's clearly set us up to play on the deck rather than Pardew's hoofball. howay man

10 games We'll have 8 points at best. He might as well fuck off now.

Don't disagree with you at all. The reason I made the point more towards the fullbacks is we need to stay in games longer and currently we are playing with two defenders with one of them being long past his best. From his quotes yesterday I reckon we'll be playing a lot more defensively against Chelsea and Man City. Wouldn't be surprised to see Anita back in the team either. The only problem is we have very little pace up front to counter attack. His aim in the next two games will be to keep the scores down, and rightly so. It's literally the only area he's not copied Pardew so far, getting utterly bummed.

Seriously, I don't mind this guy in the squad, but no way he should be starting. Looks very weak when it comes to challenges. I don't like Dummett either though. Hahaha. Said it after the first game you muppets. Still think he's problems so far are more mental than anything else. Dummett has also become a lot better LB in people's minds during his time out. Not like Ronaldo to selectively quote someone.

I know what you're saying like but it's literally stuff that gets better with a win. We're not reinventing football here, this is timeless stuff.

Was glad to see Perez in there, didn't have too many complaints before the match. I think watching yesterday made me think maybe the formation and team selection isn't as much of a problem as what seems like a chronic lack of morale, teamwork and drive amongst the players. They looked like total strangers who've never played with each other before in their life, no communication, no unspoken understanding of where to move or where to pass the ball - players feeding a ball through on the outside of a defender just as the player they were passing to checked his run and darted in to the middle, things like that. No-one was working for each other, there was no gestures of "unlucky mate" or hands up of "my fault, good idea". Conversely, the players didn't look comfortable enough with each other the criticise a wrong decision or bad pass, aside from some undirected looking at the sky. It's usually the kind of stuff I'd scoff at as being a bit David Brent, but it looks like these lads need to go and play paintball together and do some f***ing trust falls or something. 10/10 All seems a bit Sunday league that tbh. It's shit that gets better with time. We just don't have any.

Thanks for proving how little you actually know about football. I've asked you a simple question and you respond with an insult. You're pathetic. I didn't insult you actually. And the basis of my criticism was that I said that timing is important to an attacker and you said that it has no bearing on free kicks or corners when it's vitally important. Have you ever kicked a football? Genuine question.

I didn't use the term and I wouldn't go as far as 'more than' adequate. It's adequate enough to be mid table and I consider you delusional got thinking otherwise. Which drug do you trust? Here if you need to talk, man. cheers buddy

Thanks for proving how little you actually know about football.

I didn't use the term and I wouldn't go as far as 'more than' adequate. It's adequate enough to be mid table and I consider you delusional got thinking otherwise. Which drug do you trust?

Define quality. Give me a stat. There's no way this lad is s*** like, yesterday in the bits I could make out he was always looking for the ball and looking for forward passes etc. such as that dink over the top first half that was just a bit heavy. He'll come good imo, as long as the team itself starts to function. Quality. f*** off Final ball / shot, beating a man. He must have delivered at least a dozen crosses in the last two games, none with quality. Not a single quality ball played in general play. set-pieces have been poor. Here's a stat for you. He's attempted 8 take-ons in the last two games (which is good to see).... he's completed just one of them. I've not said he's shit or anything like that. As I've said I think a lot his problems will solve themselves with time, he needs to hit form and his groove. At the moment he's trying stuff but it's just not coming off, that won't last forever. Crucially unlike HBA and Cabella it looks like the manager will give him time and back him to come good. Everything has to be instant these days, there's some fucking crowing he called Mitrovic as shite after two games on here ffs.