mrmojorisin75

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like? Probably not, but serves the cunt right for not doing the due diligence when he bought us. Fat cunt. nonsense No it's not. He didn't do due diligence, only absolute idiots would spend 125M on a business and not actual see any of the books. in actual fact i think you'll find gambles are made in business every day of the week, what tends not to happen is when a gamble is lost temporarily the billionaire in question just says "aye well, 150m down already, suppose another 100m isn't that much to miss" there's no fucking reason why he shouldn't want his money back, as objectionable as he is So when we get £63m+ from the Premier League this season, it's ok for him to take the lot in your view? absolutely not, when have i ever said that? i'm the person arguing against "certain people" that we should expect to spend that money now because it's guaranteed however as the owner is 100m down i'd expect there to be a % involved...don't see what's controversial What's controversial is that it appears to be 100%, or at least that 0% is going to be spent on players, or a new manager. You don't think we should spend some of that money now? Why on Earth not? i don't know how many times i can say it in english, i believe that being 100m in debt he has the right to want to recover it somehow, i don't agree that he should be recovering it at 100% of club income to the detriment of what goes on on the pitch clear enough?

greed

becasue perhaps as a businessman who has essentially destroyed his competition ruthlessly over the last 10 years he would rather have the 100m back, i don't know, it's irrelevant...he's due it, the issue is how he goes about getting it back

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like? Probably not, but serves the cunt right for not doing the due diligence when he bought us. Fat cunt. nonsense No it's not. He didn't do due diligence, only absolute idiots would spend 125M on a business and not actual see any of the books. in actual fact i think you'll find gambles are made in business every day of the week, what tends not to happen is when a gamble is lost temporarily the billionaire in question just says "aye well, 150m down already, suppose another 100m isn't that much to miss" there's no fucking reason why he shouldn't want his money back, as objectionable as he is So when we get £63m+ from the Premier League this season, it's ok for him to take the lot in your view? absolutely not, when have i ever said that? i'm the person arguing against "certain people" that we should expect to spend that money now because it's guaranteed however as the owner is 100m down i'd expect there to be a % involved...don't see what's controversial

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like? It's his own company we're talking about here, not two separate entities. NUFC can't run off with his cash. There's absolutely no way it's acceptable for us to spend £0 in transfer fees so that he can get his money back (does he have a big leccy bill or something?) How much is ok for him to take out in your view then? Just what we would have spent in transfers or can we go ahead and take the lot and bankrupt the club? This attitude amongst our fans of "he's the owner, he can do what he wants" is disgusting tbh. Ronaldo's right about the pathetic specimens we have become. The Yank cunts tried this with Liverpool and were ran out of town, it didn't matter how much money they had, the fans made their position untenable. We just carry right on licking Ashley's ring. fuck off wullie man, alls i'm saying is noone can expect anyone to just write off 100m in an ideal world he'd be smart and realise success is the way to money but we don't live in an ideal world

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like? Probably not, but serves the cunt right for not doing the due diligence when he bought us. Fat cunt. nonsense No it's not. He didn't do due diligence, only absolute idiots would spend 125M on a business and not actual see any of the books. in actual fact i think you'll find gambles are made in business every day of the week, what tends not to happen is when a gamble is lost temporarily the billionaire in question just says "aye well, 150m down already, suppose another 100m isn't that much to miss" there's no fucking reason why he shouldn't want his money back, as objectionable as he is

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like? Probably not, but serves the cunt right for not doing the due diligence when he bought us. Fat cunt. nonsense

seems harsh holding kinnear to such cruel taskmasters as reality tbh, it's surely a bit like that fella who chained up the lasses in the basement for 10 years then said he wasn't a bad guy

We were 1 trophy behind Swansea. and in football terms about 1,000 light years

hold on, are you saying ashley should let his 100m+ just ride like?

i'd like the facepalm explained brett, disgrace tbh

Nah, hang the cunt.

yeah, i was laughing at him for writing such stupidity, doesn't mean you're right boring indeed maybe find another quote from when the "tide turned" or whatever it was you said

Ok. I think everybody wouldnt mind if Pardew turned it around. A point Ian W frequently makes is that he see's the positives in Pardew, indeed his posts are often positive about him. This is despite the fact he thinks he's a poor manager and ideally wouldn't be at the club. Why can't that logic work the other way? It can, and I'd have no problem with it, at all. I don't blame anyone for disliking him as a manager, or even as a person. It was just a laugh to point out bimpy's swings. wasn't a swing like, he's arguably chosen a few badly placed words...the very same sentence you partially quote is followed by: "in the hope he can prove he isn't a complete idiot (As soon as you see Jonas lined up against Man City he will prove what an idiot he is)." he's backing the guy simply as he's our manager, like many back shola when he wears the shirt despite knowing he's utter shit...tbh your quote is bollocks imo inochi

i hope he turns it around, i just know he can't with absolute certainty EDIT: therefore he doesn't have, and will never have my backing for the nothing that it's worth

I say loads of shite tbh There's my point. I remembered it because I knew for a fact you'd change your tune as soon as the mood shifted again. did the mood shift towards pardew? what prompted that inochi? was it the inspiring draw with rangers, or when we made motherwell look ordinary?

fucking hell bimpy that was 16 days ago

Totally agree, difference is Souness resigned, this knacker would hang on to the bitter end. That Scottish pig did not resign! He was sacked oddly enough after a night match hammering off.......Man City! he's right, it was gullit who walked without the payment...one reason i'll not hear a word said about the guy

pretty sure way back when everyone hated pardew i recall myself and stu were on the 'give him time' team...i gave him time but could see through it in his most ever successful league season, absolute charlatan of a manager

how's that? bimpy's been able to see through pardew for a looooong time man, you dug up some obscure post or something?

the smileys aren't enough man

what i haven't understood about pardew recently is that kinnear was obviously a massive, public slap in the face for him and he clearly has the power in the contract stakes or ashley would have canned him by now you'd think therefore why is he still being the mouthpiece?