Kaizero

Giggs and Bellamy young and up and coming?

It'll be like footballing porn man. Transexual scat porn, aye. Can't fucking wait. 22 men 1 cup

They've been boring as fuck. He's a masochist.

It'll be like footballing porn man. Transexual scat porn, aye.

This EC has been a total disaster. Fuck betting.

Pirlo.

Their FA refused to have their players selected, no? Or am I just imagining things?

Deutschland, Deutschland über alles.

As I've said earlier, this has IMO been the most dissapointing EC/WC in my life (since I can remember paying attention - 96). Well dissapointed, felt like a chore watching most games.

Incredible that Beckham was not one of the three over-23 players considering who actually got chosen. Nonsense selections tbh. That said, I wouldn't say it would've been a sporting decision to bring Beckham. But considering the chosen ones, it'd be a better sporting one as well. Deffo better choices out there, though.

Yes. Sicko.

I'm struggling to remember an EC/WC with less atmosphere/entertainment in my lifetime (since I started paying attention, ca. 1996). Well dissapointed with this.

Whole thing just feels like som random Int friendly played in some neutral country like Brazil love doing.

I think I may actually dislike Spain more than I dislike Ronaldo as I'd rather see the Spanish cunts cry going out than Ronaldo crying.

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c75/Kaizero/d0da3741.gif

Inter. Pedant. Must admit, I can't stand people calling Inter 'Milan' or Milan 'AC Milan'. Isn't that what they're called? Only in England have I ever heard people mention "Milan" and mean AC Milan. Elsewhere in Europe people would ask you if you mean AC or Inter... I'm elsewhere in Europe and I've never heard anyone refer to Inter as "Milan" around these parts. Only AC Milan are referred to as Milan.

I much prefer it with more white than black tbh.

“@_Adam_Penny: @the_dilsh you not fancy getting Tiote on twitter? Or does he to mad when he's told what to do?” I can't look him in the eye “@nufc_bryant: @the_dilsh Do you get discount off of sports direct clothing ? Surely Ashley gives you a 10% or more discount card” ha ha

"any new signings apart from amalfitano for next season?" "yeah thinking of going with Vodafone" Killed me.

I really loathe Spain these days. Greece anno 2004 were more entertaining to watch because at least they were major underdogs fighting to hang on to their leads. Spain just play like cunts for the sake of being cunts when you look at the quality of their squad, man.

Yes but it's two complete decisions. The decision of weather the player is offside or not needs to be made as soon as the player receives the ball, what happens next shouldn't be down to the referee or linesman, the linesman needs to make the offside decision before and regardless of what follows. They are two separate incidents, the outcome of one shouldn't determine the outcome of the other. But it clearly does. If he's offside, then what happens next is automatically nullified. If he's not, then it isn't. They're obviously not separate. What Stifler is trying to say is that the offside incident is something that can go one of a million different ways one can speculate in for ages after a match. A ball across the goal line is a ball across the goal line, it's not something that can be discussed for ages. The issue is, for me, how definite something is/should be in its effect on the game. Say, AC got a pen for his horrific dive against us earlier this year. It'd be a human error from the ref. An LFC player would still need to put the pen away. If Krul got sent off it could have a galvanising effect on the rest of the players battling together and winning regardless. See what I'm getting at? It's all theories regarding what could happen due to these incidents. There's probably hundreds more that could be made. A ball in the goal is a ball in the goal. It's not debatable with proper technology. However, I see the point in that it's a gateway technology and people could start saying all other controversial incidents should get non-human "reffing". But it should be a nonsensical debate. It's the definite side of it that makes goal line technology different from someone saying someone's offside or not.

It's more that the other situations happens on the field of play, and thus feels more natural to attribute to human error. However, a ball crossing the line is just beyond human error to not recognise. I'd accept human error in offside calls rightly/wrongly allowing a goal to stand and so on, but not that nobody gives a shit that the ball has crossed the line into the goal. I don't want technology beyond goal line technology, but the game really needs that. Basically, every ref error in the field of play with cards and free kicks and so on will have an effect on the game, theoretically. You can speculate a tons of ways how decisions make a game go either way. However, a ball in the goal is a ball in the goal. That's a definite. No matter what (pending it's not offside/falsely offside) it would have a major effect on the game. A bad penalty call still needs to have the penalty go in for it to be a talking point and so on. Hope that made sense, felt I started ranting at the end there.