Kaizero

Great for the floated corners to the back post. Just imagine the height! One big shirt ref may never notice http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c75/Kaizero/FozMupMan_zps8840a691.jpg

European clubs can still make transfers outside of UEFA, no? If that's the case, why don't they go get someone on loan from South America? Almost anybody'd be a better shout than Carew. Don't think Carew was employed. There was some ridiculous article in some red top paper the other day, with him starrign in some low budget Norwegian horror flick ( no I'm not joking!), and how he was looking to start acting. http://fotball.aftenposten.no/multimedia/archive/00177/carew_177747o.jpg It's not a Norwegian flick though, it's an American one.

John Carew apparently having a medical at Inter today.

Dear god. I really think some people may have missed just how bad Krul's kicking is, Elliot's kicking is miles better even though its not great Krul's kicking is bad, so Elliot's isn't? How does that work?

NOK to £ is basically just 10 NOK = £1 8,65 See bold. Easier math.

NOK to £ is basically just 10 NOK = £1

http://www.manutd.com/articles/20130221/giggs-could-be-back-for-swans_2281670_3083814 Giggs could be back then as well.

I said its the one important area where it can be used easily without interfering with the game, not that its the one important area full stop (as in the most important one). Yeah, I suppose you're right on that. It is the easiest place to introduce technology, but it doesn't really make a significant impact on fairness in the game. Which would be my reason for wanting technology. Personally I would use no technology and educate people to accept the decision of the ref, but I realise that won't be happening. That's just idiotic. It's as black and white a thing you can get. Either it's in or it's not. I've gone into greater detail regarding the subject on page two of this thread or something. It's nothing like other decisions in the game where it's about the ref making a wrong call. A goal is a goal is a goal. A wrong offside decision is a wrong offside decision and does not have the same impact even if a goal is wrongly ruled out because of it because at least we know if the ball was in or not. If a ball is in the net and there's no offside/foul play, the ball is in the net. It's not a human decision anymore like if a ref pulls back advantage based on his own mindset even if a player gets through split seconds after. It's a goal or it's not a goal. It's not video reffing, it's not taking out the human aspect of the game. It's just helping the referee, who can't really see if a ball cross the line or not unless it's quite clear, if it's a goal or not. Normally a referee should be able to see if there's an offside (with help from his linesmen) or if there's a foul as he's in the situation. It's not comparable situations regarding solutions whatsoever.

http://www.otf2.com/wiki/images/9/95/Franck-ribery.jpg

It really is. We're not in 1993 anymore. We're not?! http://media.tumblr.com/a15958e99205e6c9a719ea4cdb3eea02/tumblr_inline_mhekmwfQ5m1qz4rgp.gif

Worthy of a thread IMO. The whole issue with gays not coming out in sports, I mean. Not necessarily just this one incident.

They looked horseturd when playing their matches against Rosenborg and got lucky with wondergoals and shit tbh. I'm basing my overconfidence of crushing them on that.

NO vs NO deffo is the most awesome option.

Mate wants in. He can't pay up until the afternoon though(ca. 1pm to be exact), but seeing how a lot haven't paid yet I take it he's still got a shot at a spot regardless?

From when we did this last time, those people who had available funds on them and were interested got the booking done - then if they subsequently couldn't make it, there were plenty of people to sell the place onto...at a profit Nixon Cheers Deffo booking myself a place then, and hopefully the calendar will be good to me around that time period.

I want to say yes. When does the yes need to be final?

10/10. Would bang.

Why he isn't injured? All your fault, innit.

Ref has been nothing but a fucking disgrace.

http://media.tumblr.com/20036016821df33b67ff4890cc241b76/tumblr_inline_mghqtdDpSB1ruj8rl.gif

From what I gather all that RAWK thread really says is that if you win all your home games, some away games and draw the rest you probably win the league. Thanks for clearing that up, RAWK.

This was meant to be the new crest until people kicked off because apparently Norwegians can't represent Norway without the flag on their chest. http://www.diskusjon.no/uploads/monthly_05_2008/post-135621-1211289916_thumb.jpg

What tradition is there with our badge? We've changed it loads of times... Maybe so, but Stoke and Fulham's respective efforts do nothing to reflect the character of their clubs and/or the city in which they're based. We might have changed ours, but it still has at least some resemblance to the club's original crest. Fulham's original badge from the get go was basically just the letters FFC.