Jump to content

Kaizero

Member
  • Posts

    49,415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kaizero

  1. It's the dumbest fucking rumour I've ever heard
  2. Today was an absolute shitfest.
  3. For my 10-fold goals scored bet to come off I need two more for Norway and two more for Portugal so fml today.
  4. This will end 0-7 just out of spite.
  5. Haaland apparently just flat out refused to be subbed because he hadn't scored yet
  6. If it wasn't for the keeper producing some god tier saves he should've had a hat trick by now, so incredibly frustrating. One of the reaction saves with the fingertips as the keeper was going the different direction of Haaland's finish was some shit Not to mention missing the open fucking goal.
  7. Haaland just missed a fucking open goal
  8. I find it fascinating watching Gibraltar literally having four men on Haaland and him still getting through time and time again If only their keeper wasn't having the game of his life this would be a massacre by now.
  9. Haaland is hammering their goal but the Gibraltar keeper has decided to channel his inner Buffon
  10. Well, fuck, now I feel pressure
  11. Haaland vs part-timers, I'm certain That lot wasn't even part-timers.
  12. £20 on Haaland hat trick @ 3.05 £10 on Haaland x4 @ 6.50 £80 on Norway -7 @ 10.00
  13. If you remove being an NUFC fan out of the equation (Bruce really isn't one tbh) I think most of us would be kidding themselves if they wouldn't hold on for £4m when their reputation is already tanked anyway. He won't step down, he needs to be sacked.
  14. Ritchie called him a coward? Aye. There was literally a whole piece by Hope saying a sizeable group of the squad 'don't trust him and don't like him'. Hope definitely has an agenda and that piece was his reaction to getting banned. Nobody else reported it. There is nothing to stop a player publicly criticizing the owner, club, manager, other players if he wants, it's not a sackable offence and they will still get paid. Might not get selected and pick up their win bonus though!! It is most definitely a sackable offence for a large variety of reasons.
  15. Chinese whispers at this stage from what the original source would have been all the way to the person who told me, but far too entertaining to not pass on in the event it's not bullshit: apparently some of the players will suggest putting up the cash themselves to get Bruce out
  16. Tuchel has since his days at Mainz been an innovate manager not afraid to alter his own system to better fit the squads at his disposal whilst staying true to his core belief of how he wants his teams to play football. I find it weird how skeptical some were after he got the gig.
  17. https://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/orlando-city-soccer/os-sp-orlando-city-daryl-dike-loan-20210201-j6puqljgebcvhne5ocgtcgnhhq-story.html "The deal will include an option for Barnsley to buy Dike from the Lions. The current option is priced at $20 million for 80% of Dike’s rights, according to a league source. If Barnsley were to buy Dike and then sell him to another club in the future, Orlando City would receive 20% of that future sale."
  18. They have a future fee agreed so up to Barnsley.
  19. Yup, thought he looked great tbh. I still get a twinge of sadness every time this thread is bumped, mind. The psych evals on reality shows, celeb versions or not, are laughable. If they want you on the show they'll get you on the show, even if you have paranoid schizophrenia.
  20. I don't really have a problem with that. It happens the other way, where a player is offside when the pass is played but onside after it takes a deflection from the defender. It's just bad luck. Or good if you're spurs. Yeah, I dunno, there's just something about it which feels harsher, in that it wasn't an ill-timed pass or run; just effective pressing forcing an error and then capitalising on it. I mean, regardless of any of that, the bottom line is that there's f*** all in it and Aguero hasn't unfairly gained an advantage by being in that position. One of the major inconsistencies of VAR is that the 'clear and obvious error' thing seems to be applied just about everywhere except offside, where incidents are so seldom clear and obvious. They might review a clumsy tackle in the box and, despite there being evidence that a foul was committed, a penalty remains ungiven on the basis of some woolly and subjective metric around the ref's ability to make the call in the first instance. Yet offside calls, based on meaningless inches in either direction, are being scrutinised and enforced with the fullest extent of their s**** tech. If the lino misses a stray kneecap it's a clear and obvious error is it? Total bollocks. I agree with most of that, but I don't think that incident can be blamed on VAR. He was in an offside position when his teammate touched the ball, so he's offside, thems the rules. The lino should have given it as offside. Just had a closer look and it's a lot tighter than I first thought but I still think it's offside. Without VAR we'd be discussing how Spurs were robbed. Yeah but I'd far prefer that to the soul being sucked out of every goal celebration. I'd prefer a fair result. I feel people complain about VAR sucking the emotion out of celebrating goals like realizing the linesman raised his flag after celebrating your ass off wasn't something that used to happen before VAR. Barely ever, I'd always look at the linesman as soon as the ball crossed the line - aye you'd get some oblivious people who took maybe ten seconds. Having a 'fair result' is just not worth it for me for removing the best thing about football. I realize it's subjective and a tired debate so I'll refrain. In my own view, I'd personally rather not NUFC won a cup final (as if we'd ever get to one ) if that win would forever be marred by a s*** decision, I'd want us to win it fair and square. But yeah, people in different corners won't convince the other at this point so it's as you say a bit tired at this stage. Your argument is slightly flawed because VAR doesn’t guarantee a ‘fair result’. The offside calls cannot be accurately measured as accurately as they’re trying and football decisions are subjective in the main, there isn’t always a ‘right’ decision that everyone is in unanimous agreement about. Does VAR overturn enough wrong decisions to make it worthwhile with all of the disruption? Absolutely not, imo. We’re having as many conversations about decisions as we always have, but now we’re having decisions about what is/what isn’t a ‘clear and obvious error’. So in actual fact, there is more controversy and more contentious decisions with the added bonus of large disruptions to the flow of the game and sucking the passion out of it. Plus I disagree with your whole point about not feeling satisfied if we won a trophy through a bad decision. We’ve had our fair share of s*** decisions, I couldn’t care less if we won the FA Cup 1-0 through Wilson throwing the ball in the net from a throw-in. It’d mean just as much as a 10-0 win. We’ve won f*** all, how can we be so fussy about where the win comes from? Because it'd be tantamount to cheating and I, personally, would not enjoy it as much as if it wasn't won that way. I'm not saying others wouldn't enjoy it, just that I wouldn't, and that I am massively in favor of VAR and thinks it improves the enjoyment of the game a thousandfold for me. That said, it has a lot of wrinkles to iron out before it's perfect still, but I want it to get there and so it needs to steadily evolve and be used to iron out said wrinkles.
×
×
  • Create New...