Kaizero

26%, or just over 1/4th of all your posts are in here, so you should know what you're doing in here since that's a fair amount of them.

At least it's not International Friendlies.

I can be in twice if you want.

Yeah, get a room already!

Yup. Was a bet, then people started taking said bet and he backtracked trying to say it was meant as £50 for charity. I'll take the bet as well fwiw. And I'll spend the £50 on something that wastes time, in the spirit of the bet.

Make way, for the USA.

Nah. 1-1. Well done, it’s league one.

I’m enjoying how different our coverage of our tactics is than the English. Saying the tactics are understandable, but a dangerous game if the tactis don’t create results as footballers want to be offensive and creative, so it’ll be harder to sell the tactics to the players if they don’t create results.

So simple, yet so funny

Jesus christ the state of that ballhandling

Don’t mind the defensive approach, but jesus christ, we need pace on the counter. Why no Muto or Murphy? I know Murphy’s shit, but at least he has pace.

Mitro’s on fire.

Was it only pre-season? That’s some bullshit then, he was going on about it being his «professional» debut and how good it felt to finally be a professional football player. Cunt’s played in tons of matches that don’t matter for bigger clubs than some A-League side. Dortmund, for one.

Usain Bolt got his professional debut for Central Cost Mariners in the A-League today.

He’s here forever?

A chance to lose money? I’m in!

Because of the modern morbid curiosity for watching murder porn.

Dudelange from Luxembourg are qualifying for the group stage of the Europa League, FM-tastic

We'd be fined and disqualified from the Premier League, all matches already played against us would be void for the teams who faced us and count as 3-0 victories. We'd finish last with 0-0-38 and a GD of -114.

FWIW, he's moving to Norway for personal reasons, he's not been invited by anyone to be a ref here. He's only informed our referee's union that he'd like to continue refereeing, and thus there'll be talks but it's not at all certain he'll get to referee here.

fyp

We'd be fined and disqualified from the Premier League, all matches already played against us would be void for the teams who faced us and count as 3-0 victories. We'd finish last with 0-0-38 and a GD of -114.

For what? If they make an obvious mistake do they need to come out and say it? Does Kenedy have to come out and explain why he took a horrible penalty? He knows it and everyone else knows it. Just because they don't explain stuff for the media doesnt mean the referees dont get feedback and talk about what happened. These things aren't the same. And Kenedy has to face the media scrutiny and questions constantly. Kenedy missing a penalty isn't a decision on his part. A referee looks at an incident and makes a decision. They get feedback from who, the referees panel, great. There is no reason why they can't explain decisions that are made. They get paid well enough and its fair to assess what they've done wrong and right. Whats wrong with a quick explanation of a decision, for clarity? As it is nobody knows why he didn't give the penalty. Refs here (Norway) sometimes get questioned after the game and are showed incidents on video being asked if they made the right decision or not with the benefit of hindsight. A few are cunts and refuse to admit fault, whilst a few has apologies to teams. Think that’s a bit mean spirited really. Its not like strikers are pulled in after a game and asked how they missed a sitter They do that over here. Feel like post-match interviews with players and staff are very common, only a natural extension that they show incidents to ask them for their reaction to them, and see no reason for that to not be extended to referees as they are just as much part of the match as the players/staff.

How the fuck did Rangers manage to squeak through with two reds?

For what? If they make an obvious mistake do they need to come out and say it? Does Kenedy have to come out and explain why he took a horrible penalty? He knows it and everyone else knows it. Just because they don't explain stuff for the media doesnt mean the referees dont get feedback and talk about what happened. These things aren't the same. And Kenedy has to face the media scrutiny and questions constantly. Kenedy missing a penalty isn't a decision on his part. A referee looks at an incident and makes a decision. They get feedback from who, the referees panel, great. There is no reason why they can't explain decisions that are made. They get paid well enough and its fair to assess what they've done wrong and right. Whats wrong with a quick explanation of a decision, for clarity? As it is nobody knows why he didn't give the penalty. Refs here (Norway) sometimes get questioned after the game and are showed incidents on video being asked if they made the right decision or not with the benefit of hindsight. A few are cunts and refuse to admit fault, whilst a few has apologies to teams.