Jump to content

tgarve

Member
  • Posts

    5,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tgarve

  1. So if the referee says he saw the handball and didn’t give a pen they would allow it?
  2. this is the main issue with it at the moment isn't it, implementation i mean that man city goal that was disallowed, for example, was not a clear and obvious error but they decided to act on it That’s because of the handball part of the law, So in essence it was a clear error as the referee didn’t see it clear and obvious is the wording, the touch with his arm was barely perceptible with VAR never mind for the ref it was bullshit I’m not saying it was right but I guess with the new law you could say it obviously hit his arm, on a replay
  3. this is the main issue with it at the moment isn't it, implementation i mean that man city goal that was disallowed, for example, was not a clear and obvious error but they decided to act on it That’s because of the handball part of the law, So in essence it was a clear error as the referee didn’t see it
  4. Absolute horseshit Wasn’t a pen at all, guy clearly dived on the replays I did think it was definitely a pen on first viewing but you can see he’s going down before the contact
  5. How about implementing a proper fit and proper persons test? How about instead of postponing games which would gain clubs like Bolton and Bury income, they let them play those games? How about as part of FFP, if your club is showing songs of financial difficulty then an administrator by the league is ordered to take control of the football club until the club is a better situation? How about there is a better trickle down of money to other clubs? How about instead of just sitting on the sidelines when their members go to the wall, they actually do something to prevent it. Both the FA and EFL have stood and watched what has happened at Bolton and Bury and let it happen. The EFL have actively taken action that would hinder both clubs from being rescued. Top post
  6. tgarve

    Sunderland

    That surely just keeps a monopoly with the biggest clubs than? Which is what they want. Why would they want that rather than more money coming in the game Euroleague or worserer Not sure that answers the question
  7. tgarve

    Sunderland

    That surely just keeps a monopoly with the biggest clubs than? Which is what they want. Why would they want that rather than more money coming in the game
  8. tgarve

    Sunderland

    That surely just keeps a monopoly with the biggest clubs than?
  9. Fair play he took that very well. To be fair a bit harsh he even had to get involved in denying it
  10. Villa fans much better than ours
  11. Yes you can get a free trial. It’s alright, decent reports, doubt I would pay a tenner a month though £2.50 a month with the deal. It's 100% worth it. There a link for that deal? How do you get 2.50 a month after a trial? Is that paid in one lump?
  12. Yes you can get a free trial. It’s alright, decent reports, doubt I would pay a tenner a month though
  13. None. Itv had the Barca game on friday
  14. Vardy was good end of last season - just have a hunch he's going to have a blinder this season under Rodgers. 33 this season though
  15. Attacking options off the bench incredible
  16. 11/18 players defenders or keepers
  17. tgarve

    Sunderland

    Weird that I thought Coleman came across well
  18. Minimal effort. Pretty much any big city in Europe there'll be an Irish bar with Sky/other sports channels. Hey presto, literally a 10-second Google search - https://www.delaneys.be/ You do realise he’s doing it to get bites? Never seen someone post so much in my life about anything then tries to claim they don’t care
  19. Can hardly ban a number like. Surely the fact a gambling site is on the front of the seniors shirt is the main issue here- not the fact a players number matches the sponsor number. Serious about kids gambling- don’t let gambling sites sponsor seniors shirts
×
×
  • Create New...