Jump to content

McCormick

Member
  • Posts

    8,561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by McCormick

  1. Don't quite see what's so bad about it really.. very sleek iyam. I haven't bought one of the new kits yet, which one should go for and what name should i get at the back? (i'm a terrible decision maker)
  2. Liverpool: worst fans in europe..
  3. Aye. Thread title is Italian though I think that is what he is referring to. And a post you made earlier.... not to mention the 'Toon Ultras' thinking of renaming themselves 'tifosi' ... is there some in-joke I'm not getting? Il nostro destino è nelle mani di un uomo spagnolo. va bene, ma, se lui è spagnolo, perche parliamo italiano? .......perché è una lingua ben più sexier e corregga per creatività. :giggle: è vero... ma... forse l'altri non capiscono. Usiamo l'italiano solo per parlare male di Invicta (dove è?).
  4. quite like it actually.. let's the insults commence
  5. piacevole per vedere internationalism. possiamo ora comunicare l'inglese?
  6. You think? Two words for you - Roger Milla i'll give you two words...
  7. Any confirmation on what was the hold up? Gartside had locked Faye in the mascot's changing room at the Reebok, left him dressed as a lion. makes sense to me.. some real messrs going on about price negotiations- they should get their head checked and think more logically. ta
  8. Just a case of mourinho having precious little money to spend, so he cant buy huge name stars; he's basically buying in the "good player for good value" department.. whuch makes our acquisitions redundant- noone is going to choose newcastle over chelsea, sad to say.
  9. more remote than anything if i'm honest... ecstatic if it went through
  10. Any confirmation on what was the hold up?
  11. Aye, we were far better off under Roeder. Its been one f****** nightmare after another this summer. shut the f*** up, you w******! far better off under roeder??? smart one there
  12. That age thing is b*llocks..
  13. Just a thought.. but when the hell are we gonna see enrique?.. i know he wants to ease him in, but he's not gonna get eased in while on the bench.. he's not a baby, i'd assume he could cope and if not sub him off, easy enough.
  14. good team that, but sub barton off for smith as hes injured, and i can't see martins not playing..
  15. Boro are a weakened side.. i can see oba really giving them some trouble and should win by 2 goals. A draw is not good enough.
  16. Good player.. not good enough for england yet, Robinson was shocking though
  17. Really? Source? not quite sure, my mate who works as the ice-cream man at bilyl bunters told me today while he sprinkled my vanila.. thanks, i will
  18. Unforunately that applies to most big name players in the twilight of their career. More money and much bigger chance of silverware even if not playing as many games at Chelsea. to put simply, its chelsea.
  19. SWP in general is massively overrated... played reasonably well though. Thought smith out of all the attackers played best (not saying much tbf).. had some good touches that went unnoticed
  20. Because Butt can read the game better, break up play without lunging tackles and doesn't give numerous freekicks away every game, Butt also didn't cost £6 million and wasn't a replacement for a player with pace who stretches games. Butt is a DM and does his job well, Smith is a striker/midfielder and does neither job particularly well, to say both players are similar is ridiculous. are you talking about the same butt? I'm talking about nicky, you know, slow as hippo with ankle weights, can only dribble from his mouth and gives the ball away whenever he has it. Both players are playing in the centre of midfield aren't they? so its not too ludicrously far-fetched to compare them- both are grafters, both get in. Smith's passing is better than butts and so's his shooting.. butt is a better tackler. Smith doubling as a striker is irelevent to what i've said. Janitor is talking a lot of sense.
×
×
  • Create New...