jdckelly

Hughes is major trouble when he gets his hands on cash (City and QPR) otherwise he's proven to be a reasonably good manager who works well with limited resources (Blackburn and Fulham)

Di Matteo will get mentioned forgot about him Owen Coyle is also available. deliberately ignored him

What is it on here with the stupid cunts on here slagging club legends off. Fuck off and watch Equestrian or Polo instead of footy you pleb. just because he's a club legend as a footballer doesn't mean he knows fuck all about managing or motivating a side

Di Matteo will get mentioned forgot about him

out of idle curiosity rather than actual expectation heres my list of realistic candidates in no particular order Mark Hughes-if he is the choice then he must have 0 say over transfers Nigel Adkins-not the choice I'd make Alan Curbishly-he's linked with everything else Laurent Blanc-outside chance imho

No. I think he would do a lot better with the current crop of personalities than the lot he had before. Not saying he'll be Alex Ferguson but he can't do much worse than he did before. Shearer would be a diabolical appointment

Daftest post of the decade tbh How's that, unfortunately it's a fact. How would you know? Not getting all ITK but I have it on great authority. so your getting all itk

if he's going to be sacked nows the time, no way anyone can defend him today after those decisions

how the hell do you respond to that

stop giving him more of it!

About 1.5% of what he's paid. Btw Redknapp himself said the other week Bosingwa is on £65k. I thought he knew nothing and didn't deal with any of the financial stuff ? I'm sure Tony Fernandes stopped playing fifa long enough to tell him how big the fine was but alas couldn't break himself away from the game with Remy to tell Harry how much Remy's paid.....................

http://i50.tinypic.com/15eedy0.jpg well I'm going to see that in my nightmares in the near future

seriously TT thats a crime against humanity!

good lord man your avatar

Because when it was initially posted the first report led us to believe it was practically done see! they're screwing it up already!

PM or on here? Either. As you've probably guessed I haven't got much of a life so if people want to post their responses on here I'm quite happy to trawl this thread hunting for them in that case there you go

remarkably unconvincing

so its gone from signed to "making approach" and will soon reach "signing for QPR"

Walcott hasn't been messed around in terms of position. He's not good enough to play as a lone striker, lets be fair - at least not in a team that wants to challenge for major honours. Media seem to go on like he's Ian Wright or Lineker, which is how good you need to be to succeed as that kind of forward. Wenger had the right idea trying to develop his game. All the young players he signs start out wide, or deeper in midfield before he gives them the the crucial #10 or #9 positions in his team. In Arsenal's current position mind with their striking options it probably is the best option to play him there, but that's more an indicament of the position they are now as a club and a squad. Would take him in a shot, like. Just not good enough to be upfront in a SUPERCLUB. Where would you play him though? Hatem is better ( goes without saying) and i think he would be pretty ineffective down the left unless you're thinking of 4-4-2 and playing him with Cisse of course. Hatem would do just as fine on the left imho

Walcott hasn't been messed around in terms of position. He's not good enough to play as a lone striker, lets be fair - at least not in a team that wants to challenge for major honours. Media seem to go on like he's Ian Wright or Lineker, which is how good you need to be to succeed as that kind of forward. Wenger had the right idea trying to develop his game. All the young players he signs start out wide, or deeper in midfield before he gives them the the crucial #10 or #9 positions in his team. In Arsenal's current position mind with their striking options it probably is the best option to play him there, but that's more an indicament of the position they are now as a club and a squad. I don't get the whole he must play up front thing from the media either, imho he is at his best in a wide forward role where he can still cut inside and get goals. If it was 10-15 years ago and most teams played 2 strikers then yes he would thrive up front but on his own I just can't see it. His major weakness as a player isn't an inherent lack of talent- he's got plenty- but poor decision making, typically he does his very best stuff when he doesn't have as much time to think about what he has to do while often (not always see his first goal vs us) when he has time something goes wrong.

agree with this, they don't react well to this sort of thing

Tbf that's not an altogether bad idea he wouldn't qualify then

PM or on here?

ok are clubs just following us around now

he's happy must be getting his move