Anderson

What's the difference between 'Sunderland' and 'City of Sunderland' and why is there a Wikipedia article for both?

John Carver's back as well who was part of the management team who brought him here and who handed him his debut, although he was turfed out by Souness a couple days later. Although I still don't think he'll come. Can see one of the big French teams taking him now he's featured, albeit sparsely, in the national squad.

Great scenes! Really hope Clarkie makes it and manages us one day.

Advantage Huddersfield.

The mackems have a song?

Mint. Even better.

What's the point in the geet big window behind the goal in Dublin? Spoils an otherwise nice stadium.

Barca away. http://cdn.footballkitsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Barzablack1.jpghttp://cdn.footballkitsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Barzablack2.jpg http://cdn.footballkitsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/puyol_away-20110517.png

Surely the extra £30,000(ish) a week Tiote's on is the £30,000 Carroll was picking up and so should have nil effect on the £35m?

Actually I finish college at 4, might have to pop into see Foluwashola on my way home like.

Someone get themselves along to the Metrocentre and serenade Jose into signing a new contract.

YouTube: David Beckham goal free kick vs Sporting Kansas City He's still got it.

Send Krul out to get a full seasons experience as a number 1 and keep Forster here for a year. Reassess the situation in a years time and sell one of them. Simples.

Aye, Babel had left a week previously and they'd already agreed a fee with Ajax for Suarez.

£15m + £6m (from the Babel transfer) = Suarez So Torres and Babel out, Carroll and Suarez in; not a single penny spent.

I don't think anyone really classes him as worth £35m, the fee was just a result of the crazy Torres transfer. Dalglish and the Liverpool board did. Only because they got £50m for Torres. Still deemed it worthy of spending £35m on it on a striker who'd only had one half season performing well. The Liverpool owners craic was the Torres deal had to be £15m more than what we were asking for Carroll (meaning they could buy Carroll and Suarez for £0 investment). It wasn't Liverpool that paid the £35m it was Chelsea, via Torres. So what you are saying is that we refused to even discuss a transfer unless it was for something insane like £35m (fair play to Ashley for that then), the bin dippers then wen't to Chelsea and Chelsea said, aye, no bother, we'll just go up to £50m then, gave Liverpool the dosh, who then despite not valuing Carroll anywhere near £35m said to us, here you go, go nuts. Brilliant! Aye, pretty much. http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/04022011/63/henry-explains-carroll-fee.html

Baines linked to City for some obscene amount, Mirror going with £25m.

Opposite Chinatown arch, next to the two new office buildings.

Will this suffice? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDYfryNtECE&feature=channel_video_title They're both such massive twats.

Dock them points and send them down! Nothing serious will happen in reality, probably as long as the FA get their own healthy little bung.

:lol:

What those three said.

Maradonna agrees to manage Dubai team Al Wasl. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13413485.stm

I don't think anyone really classes him as worth £35m, the fee was just a result of the crazy Torres transfer. Dalglish and the Liverpool board did. Only because they got £50m for Torres. Still deemed it worthy of spending £35m on it on a striker who'd only had one half season performing well. The Liverpool owners craic was the Torres deal had to be £15m more than what we were asking for Carroll (meaning they could buy Carroll and Suarez for £0 investment). It wasn't Liverpool that paid the £35m it was Chelsea, via Torres.