Because he is essentially given a job at the BBC with no review of performance (clearly, since he's still doing it). Anyone who is in that roll will have people talking, regardless of how good or bad it is. His just happens to be incredibly shit.
So, because people talk about how shit his writing and analysis is, it's okay?
Also, I still don't how "but they didn't" has any relevance to that argument?
I need to forget about it all week and usually can't bear to listen to people talking about it.
After particularly shit losses like last week I usually try to avoid football altogether.
Pretty much. I don't usually watch MOTD or any highlight show either. I don't even like to post on here, except for maybe 30 minutes after a loss, for a day or so.
That Man City loss really killed Man Utd. They looked fantastic at the beginning of the season, then Fergie completely closed it up and they've been incredibly mediocre.
Definitely.
What did he say this time?
Forgot actually, something pro-Man U. Tyldesley is clearly devastated that Man U are out.
He said a Hail Mary as United lined up a set-piece.
Seriously? What does he have to do before they kick him off television?
Isn't a 'hail mary' something to do with american football? Like a hit and hope thing? Might be wrong
Yes. Just a long, hopeful throw on the last play of a game/half.
Yeah, the moneyball scheme has become irrelevant now, as everyone uses it. The Yankees/Red Sox/Cubs and many other clubs still overpay a lot, they're just using different information than they were before.