LFEE

He's a weapons-grade cunt: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelvin_MacKenzie Read up to the bit where he worked for the Sun then backed out of his wiki. Anybody who worked or works for that is instantly a cunt in my eyes Alan Shearer had a column with them Still might actually.

Is it considering we only got 6 good month out of him? He was always more style over substance though I accept he was heavily marked when in days you could “mark“ someone. I’d wager a bet (And I’ve not checked) that Robert’s goals and assists blow Ginola’s stats away.

Most the fans on Twitter wouldn’t even know who he is GC treading a strange morality ground there baring in mind he theoretically agrees with him considering which side he’s been backing. Don’t understood this modern thinking of not being allowed to agree with some things people say that in the past you don’t. Makes you very small minded IMO. Yes he’s had an odious and probably still is. However if you agree with what he says and want to retweet it or post it fair play. I noted journalists coming up with the excuse that a retweet is not necessarily an endorsement when it suites them.

Or they could all work together, egos aside. It's not all about one group amalgamating and becoming the biggest/only voice. They could and they should but more @ = more egos unfortunately. Easier to co-ordinate stuff and deploy different action to suitable skill sets as a singular. Ultimately as long as they keep going and trying anything with the best intentions wether it be as one group or not is the main thing. Look what one guy off his own back can achieve today. Wether it just a little bit of traction it’s still important. Greg[/member] Out of interest did Toon For Change consult NUST before sending their letter today to Masters?

You missed off Kelvin rearing his head to back the deal too

Yep. Notice how I didn’t point out the “most important” @ they didn’t tag

All those @ would be much stronger as just one @

So it was more important to get numbers (and peoiples money) that to be honest with them about the Trusts intentions going forward? Looked that way at the time, and to see it confirmed is no surprise. Nope. We've been open and honest about the need to build the membership from day 1. The Trust doesn't run on magic beans and I can assure you if it was about money it would cost a lot more than £1 for a share and £1 a year for annual membership. We reduced the price so low because it's not about money - it's about making the Trust open and accessible to all. The money is safe - it's in the accounts - which get audited and filed as they have to. We've spent a little bit this last year or so but not much - on the work to fight the Strawberry Place developments for example but there's our finances are healthy, and safe, ready for when we need money to do things - like for example........now! Thanks for the response - my comments came from the reason I haven't joined, which was due to the fact the Trust gained lots of members at times of mass disillusionment, but is there to advocate on behalf of match-going fans, of which I feel there should be none. I hope the Trust can take a slightly more militant tone going forward. I'll watch developments with an eye open. Why watch others? Why not do something. Wether militant or not.

I’ll give you the £1 to join if that’s the problem. I was happy to outline the reasons yesterday on this very thread why I've not rejoined the trust. Idiot. Feel free to. No one is going to charge you for doing so. Though server donations always welcome. Eh? I did! So no different then

I’ll give you the £1 to join if that’s the problem. I was happy to outline the reasons yesterday on this very thread why I've not rejoined the trust. Idiot. Feel free to. No one is going to charge you for doing so. Though server donations always welcome.

I’ll give you the £1 to join if that’s the problem.

Brilliant. Hope people keep it up on all their Tweets.

Fair play to that tweet. Quite funny I thought. Got to take it when you give it boys.

I kind of agree. My theory is PIF AND MASH are working together on this. The line saying the EPL were happy to let month by month go by saying they would never make a decision knowing the flak was landing more and more on PIF. MASH agrees to play along at an increased price whilst PIF clarifying MA is not the bad guy in this scenario the EPL is. MA acts furious as he’s lost a £300m+ deal. Season is over so it has more media attention. Just a theory mind. Or clutching at straws Ingenius. The call out to the fans as well... Also this way it’s allowed them to break silence and point fingers yet re-do the deal without the need of a second deposit

I kind of agree. My theory is PIF AND MASH are working together on this. The line saying the EPL were happy to let month by month go by saying they would never make a decision knowing the flak was landing more and more on PIF. MASH agrees to play along at an increased price whilst PIF clarifying MA is not the bad guy in this scenario the EPL is. MA acts furious as he’s lost a £300m+ deal. Season is over so it has more media attention. Just a theory mind. Or clutching at straws

Several. Thank fuck I'm off work tomorrow. Enjoy I’ve PM’d you

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/newcastle-saudi-arabia-takeover-collapse-22444062

bigfella[/member] You’ll be wanting that pint now?

Ref my Darren Gough info just passing on. Don’t shoot the messenger He just read out a text he received in April saying what one of the main concerns were for it passing. No SA representation available to question. I’m no fan of DG but end of the day these people are in the same circles as the likes of GolfMag etc. People talk.

Darren Gough saying no one from SA appeared at any of the meetings to answer questions etc as part of ownership make up going back to April. To be fair to him he said from day one it wasn’t happening.

Unfortunately he's right Can't wait to see what these 'other options' turn out to be. No doubt he'll be right there an all. Well it’s obvious. Just read Golfmag’s post from a few minutes ago.

Let’s see what Club’s version of events are...

Yep I was thinking that when you read the interpretation of his own tweet he gave. Though if that’s the case you’d have to ask why he would Tweet what he did in the first place.

Off his box. Gets worse. His mannerisms are textbook Craig Bellamy.