Hanshithispantz

the link on the front page isn't working for me OMFG!

I've read that title about 5 times now and I still havn't got a fucking clue what's going on.

Aye, just a bit of car smashing. Nowt wrong with that

The class shite actually irritates me tbh (so if that's their intention then fair play, although it quite clearly isn't). It's just ridiculously sanctimonious to the point where I struggle to comprehend how they can even pretend to believe it themselves.

These consecutive posts

Electromagnetic racism at it's finest

You proper hate life like, don't you Sicko?

Was about to stick every cent I had on Big Time Billy until I sensed a change in the winds. Went for El Libertador instead, purely because his jockey seems to wearing some sort of black and white striped garment.

No it doesn't, but 4-3-3 allows you to keep the ball better and have a better balance between attack and defense. Not to mention it suits Cisse, Ben Arfa, Cabaye, Jonas etc etc a lot more. As England showed at the Euros showed 4-4-2 is fine without the ball, but in possession you lack options to go forward properly which is where 4-3-3 excels. There have been many teams in the history of football who have been fucking sublime going forwards playing a 4-4-2 system. We were one of them. It depends on our personnel next year but there's nothing wrong with playing 2 strikers up top, and you certainly don't "lack options". We aren't Barcelona and we aren't going to try and monopolise possession.

I do prefer 4-3-3 fwiw, I just don't think we should let our bad experiences of 4-4-2 last year effect our system next year.

4-4-2 doesn't have to be hoofball, as we will probably see when we phase out Williamson and Simpson. For some reason I cannot imagine a backline of 'Santon Coloccini Douglas* Debuchy*' being set out to contain teams and hit it long. *The style of players we are looking to bring in atleast.

No, just like how Johan Cabaye's doesn't turn to John when he reaches 45.

:lol: EDIT:

That has to be a piss take

Fucking hell

I think West Ham is just about the worst club he could join in terms of his progression like, it'll suit his best attributes and allow him to be a battering ram for a year but I doubt he'll become a better footballer through it.

Whether he's managed 5 minutes or 10 years is not the point so I'm not sure how that is relevant in the slightest. All coaches usually have a set style of play that they stick to and it's a reasonable argument that Carroll doesn't look suitable to it. He's the manager and he's got every right to ditch a player he doesn't want to work with. I don't think it'll work for Rodgers at Liverpool for a number of reasons like, but you cannot critisise him for getting rid of any of the current crop. To coin a phrase from Stu in the betting thread, "don't chase your losses", they keep on banging on about the price tag as a reason he shouldn't be let loose but that isn't going to make him perform any better, they need to forget about the £35m and do what's best now for the manager and the system.

The icon for the new site (on the tabs) is even shite ffs

5 pages?

That gif man ffs

You know for a fact that's going to get sung too

show some respect you cunt Fuck that cunt

Who the fuck are these cunts?

Gutted I didn't think of that now like, Xisco looks like a down-and-out.