Scoot

Give your head a shake man.

Funny that. Every player we've signed since the takeover was/is shit according to them. Now they're saying anyone could have got us into the champions league because we've spent £400 million? Make your minds up ffs.

Imagine waiting 26 years for this.

Scotland are the San Marino of this tournament.

Nowt new really.

A mag meltdown? What they completely fail to realise is we don't have meltdowns over things that happen to them in the same way they have hourly meltdowns in regards to whatever happens here with us. We don't really give a shit about them. We just laugh at them 99% of the time.

Blue Pop. Seagull Shagger!

Playing as number 1 for Burnley who basically got pezzled every week isn't really a strong indicator of what you're getting I suppose. I trust the club's judgment and scouting on this one. Obviously England see something in him as well as he's in and around the squad at the age of 21.

So that's 10M for Ekwah, 30M for Dan Neil, 30M for Jack Clarke and 20M for Patterson. I'm sure I'll have forgot a few superstars and their RTG valuations off this list, so feel free to add... But I mean, it's just amazing that this superstar filled side finished 16th in the Championship last season. How?

A lot of the so called big clubs loan loads of players out abd then sell them before they've even kicked a ball for their parent club. If we get offered 40 million for Minteh, you take it all day!

Up at 4am for work but decided to stop up and watch that. What a 1st class idiot I am! Goodnight everyone.

I'm surprised there hasn't been more said about it if I'm honest. They're a red listed species. But as with a lot of stuff like this, the general opinion will be, people couldn't give a shit. They want flashy lights.

Doesn't sound good haha

Wow, love that video.

Yeah, I've just read the times article again, the ones who broke the story and they say City are looking to end the APT rules. https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/man-city-legal-action-premier-league-hearing-7k6r5glhq

Yes. It's the 2024 ammendments that City are challenging. The rule that was brought in in 2021 just after our takeover, would still be in place according to Douglas. Have the rest of the media missed this or has Douglas got it wrong?

Exactly. If we just revert back to the 2021 rules, well those rules were brought in to stop us too. So what fucking difference will it make even if City win?

Marl Douglas saying its the February 2024 ammendments that City are challenging. If they are successful the rules would just go back to what they were when they were first made in 2021, just after our takeover. If this is true, cant see it making a huge amount of difference to us even if City win.

I've read the full quotes from him and he's happy to stay here and would only leave if the club were forced to sell him due to FFP or release clause met. He's happy here.

Are we up to something or are expecting something to happen in our favour?

Probably the best option. Perhaps they're so confident City will win, that's there's no need to get involved?

Nufc-forum.com Aye that was decent, then as you say it just vanished.

I'm all for succeeding through City's methods. I don't care anymore. We've been held back by a fat leach for 15 years and then once we got rid of him and got owners who want to make us great, the league changes all its rules to stop us. Fuck this, go for it City and hopefully we fully benefit from it.

Is that in the article??