-
Posts
3,329 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by 1964
-
He's a total creep. Is he still tweeting from Pav's account - even though he's been dead for nearly a year? I'm not from the area so I've never really known what his deal is when he gets mentioned. Had a Google, it seems he's a doorman/actor/boxing promoter/agent/fansize editor/sacked football agent/pr. Does that just about cover it? No you've missed off self-promoting gobshite, utter c$nt, total embarrassment and weapons grade bellend
-
It will be on ready to groom within the hour as an example of us all
-
Agreed, if they are doing due diligence they aren’t messing about. They are not doing that with any other club so the ‘other potential buyers’, ‘other potential clubs’ is a bit of gamesmanship on both sides
-
She actually looks mental
-
Wait is this cause I posted that pic? What's creepy about it? (apart from her in the actual picture ) I was reading an article about her and that pic was there, and like I said I thought she looks a bit.. well creepy I suppose. All the "milf", "something something blowjob" and so on comments are bizarre, I agree sanitise life I say effing hell Nah, it was just a general comment about this thread. fair enough ahem
-
Amanda Stavely You are the love of my life Amanda Stavely You, me and the wife Amanda Stavely Three is better than two
-
Lives around the corner from me in a house that any journeyman footballer nowadays would turn his nose up at. Shows how the game has changed money wise. He would be a millionaire 10 times over in the current market
-
I f***ing love it. He's like The Rock compared to every other player. Checks out. That picture is fucking terrifying. More so as it looks credible
-
Newcastle United lose Judicial Review against HMRC
1964 replied to ChrisMcQuillan's topic in Football
The investigation could not happen as they could not examine the documents they seized. The fact that we have tried to stop them having access does not bode well in my opinion, if there was nothing to hide why launch the challenge. This might not end well It might mean that Mike is keener to walk away though. .... or any potential investor Any potential investor will be completely innocent though. Anything happening here will be against individuals. Not necessarily, the club could be held accountable under FA rules, depending on what is found and the charges -
yeah you might need to think that one over, if they were making £100m a week, that equates to £5.2 billion pounds a year
-
Newcastle United lose Judicial Review against HMRC
1964 replied to ChrisMcQuillan's topic in Football
The investigation could not happen as they could not examine the documents they seized. The fact that we have tried to stop them having access does not bode well in my opinion, if there was nothing to hide why launch the challenge. This might not end well It might mean that Mike is keener to walk away though. .... or any potential investor -
Newcastle United lose Judicial Review against HMRC
1964 replied to ChrisMcQuillan's topic in Football
The investigation could not happen as they could not examine the documents they seized. The fact that we have tried to stop them having access does not bode well in my opinion, if there was nothing to hide why launch the challenge. This might not end well -
I was under the impression there was nothing wrong, and we filed a complaint because of the way this was handled på HMRC? Or am i mistaken? I think you are mistaken as HMRC have not examined any of the documents yet due to the appeal against seizure. If it goes against us today and therefore there is a case to answer, the subsequent examination of the records and evidence will determine our guilt or otherwise
-
This may all change if the HMRC case goes wrong, there is a decision today on whether or not the warrants were legal i.e. whether HMRC had sufficient evidence to suggest there is a tax fraud case to answer and therefore enter NUFC premises and seize documents. If this goes against us I suspect we might be in limbo for a while
-
Liverpool should have won the game like. As well as I think we played and as bad as they think they were on another day we probably need another goal there. It wasn't an onslaught though, and I felt oddly comfortable throughout the game. They had 2 shots on target to our 4 so i don't think that stacks up
-
Watching him run through on goal yesterday, I thought he was going to stop, Jesus he knew he had a defender chasing him and he was so lucky that Matip hoofed it off his shin. I doubt he would have many supporters if he didn't have that slice of good fortune, he cannot finish. He has missed some monumental sitters by either panicking or trying to take the cover off the ball like that chance early in the second half against Stoke. No composure and brittle confidence in my opinion...... having said that I'm not sure we have better :lol:
-
She is saying 'look, my chin mirrors my cleavage'
-
He doesn't come in any other variety
-
To be fair though I think we will get humped
-
Nice herpes scab. Did our lot do this cringefest last year?
-
Lost his confidence, doesn't seem like one you would want in the trenches
-
Always looking for a killer ball rather than a simple sideways pass, that's what sets the good players apart they are not afraid to take risks
-
We still have HMRC on the horizon, just saying
-
They've reduced the size of the pitch. It's the size of the defeats you need to reduce you bloody cretins
-
So that's why Sunderland voted for Brexit