Sir Toon

And the rest. I've heard figures of between £25m and £40m a year from people who are qualified to make that valuation. Hence why I put £10m+

I wouldn't read a word of the sun not even the bit that says Page 3? I do get the occasional urge to indulge in the political meanderings of Prosecco (18) from Croydon. Not. Jokes aside, you just know that there will be a profile matching that description dont you?

I wouldn't read a word of the sun not even the bit that says Page 3?

I believe nowt either although when an exclusive is attached you suddenly think it has more to it. One thing that hasn't been mentioned anywhere is that most contracts will either end on June 30th or see a calender year of a deal come off and we may have one or two ready to go through on July 1st. Maybe Fernando is one of them.

Fernando incoming? https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/3854909/newcastle-fernando-manchester-city-rafa-benitez-5million/

Wonder if it's because Rafa doesn't want any of the linked players, especially Lejeune?

I fail to see where we'd need a massive investor to continue to stick the funds in unless they make a pigs arse of it by getting relegated and have to protect their original investment. Running us on the Ashley model of self sustainability would have the advantage straight away of funds generated through merchandise going straight back into the club instead of down Shirebrook. There's also the small topic of ground advertising as the SD logos are stopping us from at least another £10m+ a year as it is. The potential for growth could be massive instead of having a brand that caps it.

Alternatively, has anyone tried to buy a normal one and get rid of the sponsor themselves before? http://www.wikihow.com/Remove-an-Iron-on-Transfer-From-Clothes

Thought this was a done deal? The currant bun have an exclusive where Celtic have joined the race at the last minute.

An unproven striker from a club with surplus personnel due to the greed of wanting all upcoming players. The unfilled potential is then only available on a loan so that he can be attempted to develop for that same greedy club without upsetting their applecart too much and is then expected to be given a starting spot to compete against the likes of the same greedy club but not directly against them due to loan conditions. In doing so a certain percentage of wage is used and a slot that would normally expect to be used on a player that will give his all here to either get his club to better things and increase the ambition of your side achieving something is lost. A potential £8m - £12m striker that with a good season under his belt for a premier league side could see his value increase to £25m - £30m in a shot. A real kick in the bollocks for a side that develops but no skin off the nose of Chelsea who can just loan him out again if he turns out to be a dud. Why are some having a meltdown again?

A few of them will be getting the jitters tonight as they get their fixtures in the morning. Reality will then set in.

I thought it was from one of them editor things like but just saying that if it was this that it isn't too bad. I still have an inkling it's red tho.

I know this. It's code for get your mortgage on it.

Nicked off twitter and probably shite but I like this if it's the away strip.

Obviously it's personal choice but for me it's just a group name, so no harm done really. One thing ive always had an issue with is 'Toon Army'. Now that name is something to gan radge about as it never made sense.

Wey aye, I agree like but what I said before in it being something that we've all used, the Geordies amongst us anyway. Translated the name just means 'Our Home 1892' On that score, there's nowt wrong with it. As for 'hyem', that was synonymous with growing up for me although I would have spelled it 'yem'. gannin yem noo me like.

Checked the aircraft activity list and his usual chopper wasn't on the list. Either it wasn't him, he has another toy or is flying under the radar but regardless of all this I cannot think of one good reason for him being there unless he's doing a personal tour with someone.

The name is something that all Geordies will have used at some point or other in their lifetime and is easily identifiable in relation to St James'

Giroud is on £100k a week but his contract runs out next Summer. It wouldn't be entirely out of our wage structure if his was part bonus based with a flatter basic wedge.

Looks like Debuchy and Jamie Redknapp modelling them as well.

The opposite the brandling The wine shop?

Wonder what shop it was? Looks like an Aldi or something when really we need to be looking in Waitrose.

This will be when relegation hits the mackems properly as no-one gives a shit when the other fixtures come out.

Kitbag. http://www.kitbag.com/stores/kitbag/en/product/newcastle-united-1994-shirt/100310?network=AW&CMP=AFC-Historical%20Football%20Kits&awc=686_1497392445_3b0134482338ceca9741066fdd671dec&utm_source=affiliate_window&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_campaign=Historical%20Football%20Kits&affid=73923

The Mackems could have had this design as well. Rio Ave. http://www.footballshirtculture.com/images/stories/rio-ave-2017-2018-adidas-home-kit/rio_ave_2017_18_adidas_home_kit_a.jpg