FloydianMag

Might be because UEFA are due to announce restructuring of CL tomorrow.

Agreed, there needs to be some kind of sanction.

Nevertheless I’ll bet they’re still backpedaling like fuck given the backlash.

Hopefully the clubs involved will be backpedaling like fuck.

Although this is only legal opinion the Football Law report also indicated that PIF were a separate entity. So a number of sources are saying it’s a separate entity apart from the EPL. https://www.footballlaw.co.uk/articles/newcastle-united-fc-takeover-and-the-premier-leagues-owners-and-directors-test Scroll to the last paragraph for the summation of the lawyers opinion.

If you run with a theme of corruption, especially using the press to do so, you’d better be sure you’ve got evidence to back you up surely?

It was ‘leak’ and ‘leek’ that first piqued my interest in his tweet.

So are we taking Caulkin seriously or does he know little to nothing?

I wondered what the reference to September was in De Marco’s tweet yesterday, this makes a little sense of it.

Note the spelling of leeks in de marco’s latest tweet

Spot on, it’s what Prime Ministers, Heads of State do. Johnson is off to India soon, he’s not off on a jolly, he’ll be lobbying on behalf of British businesses.

Look who’s back.

ST renewals due?

21/22 season to commence 14/8/21, not that we’ll be in the PL so 7/8 for us?

The Pepperoni Cup ffs, you have to laugh at them!

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means f*** all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live? Good question. If the deal were truly dead then the company should be wound up and dissolved. Thats assuming it was connected to the takeover in first place. Cant rememebr if JV1 was linked in any of the docs that leaked last year. JV1 if I remember is Joint Venture 1 a company set up by PCP/ Reuben Bros to facilitate the purchase of the club. If the deal was/is dead you would have thought the company would be dissolved.

No, it's just an annual filing requirement. It is, however if the takeover was dead in the water then you would expect the company to close. So (and its still clutching a little) the fact that it's still being kept live suggests mileage that once the legal case(s) are through the parties will be back Thats just the confirmation statement that every company has to file every 12 months to state that none of the previously submitted info has changed. Means fuck all other than the company is still 'live'. Question is if the deal is dead in the water as some suggest then why does the company remain live?

Yep, it’s my birthday, 70th, be great if it’s good news re takeover, who knows

Wasn’t she in Whitley BayWatch?

Nah and his source posting info elsewhere isn’t illegal FFS or mean Mimms’ stuff is incorrect. I can confirm even as a known gobshite his updates were/are legit. You know yourself Rocker[/member] I have a legit source too and same kind of info that Mimms has relayed once or twice. Again I’m now 100% confident this takeover will eventually happen and if not before the year’s end, soon into the new year! Everything going on in private behind the scenes seems all positive stuff No red flags

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12388231/officers

I’m sure the BZG one was Monochrome Holdings?

Gorilla. Mitts and Ben Jacobs tweets they deleted, have been saved and will be used by the QC’s apparently

https://news.sky.com/story/ashley-offers-green-50m-lifeline-amid-tussle-over-arcadia-millions-12144812