Scotty66

Knowing how things have gone the stock market and banks will collapse and the money will go missing during the transfer to Ashley.

Still listed as an active director on companies House. Not sure how long they take to update things but I don't think he will leave officially until the news breaks that the takeover is passed.

Not really, it's a takedown of the BeIN claims that the WTO ruling means they should block the takeover. Fair play then ? Hope it has an impact on Richard "maybe I'll do that tomorrow" Masters. Is it fair to say the PL lawyers would agree with everything that is said in the letter?

Brilliant effort. Bit late though aren't they?!

So Bein entire business model is to broadcast football, yet they are (or threatening to) walk away from deals that involve broadcasting football? Sounds like the kind of shit you see on dragons den.

I remember when it felt like 200 was a solid prediction. Jokes on us! And Ryder saying it could go on until June and everyone was pissing themselves

Apparently the other day he was telling Staveley that a document she couldn't find/provide simply didn't exist. Then someone else found it and passed it to the judge

But apparently that still doesn't mean the end of it for PIF. There are other ways they can appeal apparently.

Yeah not much we don't know. Small rumour that the PL may make a decision this week although he says the buyers haven't even heard that so could be bad news if true. Mentions AS getting an apology in court and credits the Newcastle fans for making sure it was known. (Judge also thanked public for alerting the court)

Powerless due to "alleged" evidence. Yeah that makes sense.

Ironically I really think their plan was to purposely take time so it seems as though they have really been considerate about everyone's concerns who are against the takeover. In reality they come across as an incompetent organisation who are getting bullied by one of their own partners.

Has FFP been relaxed, I know it was being talked about a few weeks back.

FFP relaxed. Come on PL pull your finger out ffs. We have things to buy!

I really wish when Edwards posts on twitter he receives zero replies. He loves the attention and thrives on it. Fair enough people need to be told but then you get people like him who just need to be completely ignored for various reasons.

It's almost as if someone has said "what can we say to get the supporters on our side" Answer : Say we will replicate the current European Champions and the team dominating the League.

Ian Dennis is defo getting his info from Qatar connections imo. I'd say those first to break the news about this American bid are too.

So what happens if the PL reject the takeover and PIF etc decide to take legal action? Does that mean another bidder can quickly try and buy the club? Surely the PL can't start another test for a different owner until this current one is finished without any appeal? Also, I wonder what power that gives Ashley? Could he pull the deal without penalty?

looks like a cross between Peyton Manning and Andy Samberg edit: or a touch of young Adam Sandler. It's none of them. I'm not even sure if who I'm thinking of is an actor now I come to think of it. Maybe just a TV presenter. It's doing my head in. He reminds me of Chris Stark from Radio 1.

Are those two a couple? Lads done well for himself.

Football Law saying he will do a write up on all of this hopefully tomorrow ?

Bein "If you don't do what we want you won't have our money anymore"

Wtf is that from NUFC.com

The worst I see from that report - BeoutQ was operated from Saudi Arabia and by Saudi nationals. It cannot be proven that it was the Saudi government. Saudi government didn't do enough to find and prosecute those in charge.

If you have seen my previous posts over the last week or so, I have simply said that the Premier League need the evidence of the "published" WTO Report, for everyone to see, to support their decision to approve (what the Media have drummed up to be) this controversial (their words) takeover. I have seen nothing to change my view on this. It is just plain, simple LOGIC . . I have no inside information. How will it support their decision to approve the takeover if it unquestionably incriminates KSA? You make no sense. It’s about PIF and the degree of separation as a legal entity, were PIF responsible for piracy, if no then the takeover should proceed. Hasn't that already been stated? I'm sure some legal expert on twitter posted a screenshot of it dated June 2nd? Didn't that come from the WTO report?