r0cafella

He won't be playing for us, just kicking rocks and picking up his salary. The best case scenario is we can loan him out and agree to share his wage.

We are stuck with Vlad unfortunately. 5 year dear anarl.

If we secure top top players for RW and CB and fill over holes in the squad I'm ok with it. Even though our results match and out strip a lot of the sky 6 out spending power doesn't and this resource allocation becomes absolutely critical for us.

I'm certain we aren't stupid enough to pay 50m for Muniz so no worries here.

It's all coming up DCL

The price for Muniz is 50m? Fucking hell avoid like the plague.

It will be fine either way.

From what I read they only want to sell for Mega money so it sounds like they are angling to ship him to Saudi. If they succeed aye, I reckon they will ask us about Gordon.

Your right, people still fume over the right back we paid a million pounds for from West ham (who's name escapes me, that's how inconsequential of a signing it was)

I'm sure we will be very interested in him but I think it will be tough to do, the asking price will be high. Forest aren't easy to deal with as we found out with what they gave us for Anderson.

A Scholar and a gentleman as always

Can anyone share this in full for those of us without accounts?

Not for sale but is for sale for the right price. Classic.

Absolutely, but at the same time the league is self governing and it's the club's themselves who decide the rules.

They are selling assets to themselves which is allowed under the rules.

This is always an option and why such signings are worthwhile. Low risk with huge potential upside. Its also why we should have been multi club long ago ( I do appreciate this sentiment is extremely unpopular though).

You've ignored every point or question I've asked. Never the less I agree the midfield needs fixing to a wider extent, and I anticipate this will be addressed. I doubt Longstaff has any future with us and Willocks future is also in question imo. That will raise funds and allow us to streamline the squad.

I'm so confused, you told me we are 2-3 players from winning the league. Now we aren't going to qualify for the champions league. Your thinking is extremely short term, this can't be done quickly, the rules which we seem to be happy to abide for slow the whole project. Why sell Miley now? How much do you think we can get for him? I think we have a manager who has shown he's pretty much unrivaled at developing talent, we have a young player who at 17 looked perfectly comfortable at premier league level, let them cook man.

This was aimed squarely at @Disco

I'm well aware we have to sell players, I'm one of the few who actually champions this. But selling Miley now for a low fee when he has so much potential makes little sense, we aren't going to use that money to sigh s Sandro who's willing to warm the bench, and you can't keep kicking the amortisation can either it adds up a lot and squad cost will be crushing if you underperform for a year and your relying on European football to bridge the gap. No disrespect but I'm sure you were hoping Minteh would have a buyback which was never going to be the case.

He can and does contribute though? Also his salary is a lot less than a replacement. Wed also he outsourcing his development to a third party without any input or control. I get we all twerk for signings and have PTSD about buying players but I don't think selling Miley to replace him makes any sense. Are fourth and 5th choice central midfielders that much better and cheaper?

Having Paul Mitchell gives the quotes is weird

This is incorrect, Amortisation isnt a free lunch. Any player you buy still has to be paid for. Last I checked, if squad cost was implemented as proposed we would have already breached.

This makes no sense friend. First issue is why on earth would we sell Miley for 14m? And who would accept a 6m profit lock?

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6402367/2025/06/05/manchester-united-psr-red-football-limited/ More PSR loopholes for everyone to enjoy. PSR is dead.