-
Posts
8,252 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Figures 1-0 Football
-
Man of the match Our prince.
-
What a miss
-
Could have almost done with bringing on someone like Mitro today, to hold the ball up and kill the game - a bit like he’s done very well for Fulham today. 0 cards in his appearances so far, 2 goals in 3 starts. Glad we booted him out though, he cant score and his discipline is shocking, we don’t wanna go down to 10 men!
-
-
Be amazed if Swansea and Palace go on to pick up 13 points, West Ham 12, Huddersfield 11 and Stoke nine - while we go on to pick up seven, the same as bottom-placed WBA. Lots of games against Everton, Watford and Leicester, as well as facing each other. Fair few wins flying around. As for us.... seems realistic tbh. Away to Liverpool, away to Tottenham and we won't win ALL 3 of those home games. We got 14 points from the last 10 games, with a harder run of fixtures.
-
Not like West Ham fans to be cunts.
-
Gonna save reading the WBA forum until I get into bed after the pub like, already looking forward to it.
-
What?
-
Full Ham 1-0. Sessegnon obviously. Deserved too.
-
I love how you call me a sad bastard and then come up with this shite. The pot really is calling kettle wherever you are concerned. Bless you.
-
Don’t think it’s optimistic at all like, think it’s very easily achievable.
-
Aye we all know that, but they don’t usually have the segregation in place, where there is going to be a substantial away following (at least from what I’ve seen) - which was my point. It’s fairly pointless having it.
-
2 of them wont/dont give a shit and are currently putting in some pretty shocking performances themselves. To be fair both Liverpool and Spurs are wildly inconsistent too.
-
Any set of fans could make those sorts of points about their teams though. Every team around the bottom (as we are & expected to be) will throw away points. It's part of why we're all in such similar situations. Instead it's more useful to focus on what is, and that is that we're playing better stuff than most of the bottom half, are in better form than most of the bottom half, are less likely to lose matches (based on nearly 3 months of solidity) and have certain form players I am confident will help us to get what we need from what is left. These reasons are why I find reacting to this really quite positive result in a negative way is not useful or really that accurate an assessment either. It's 3 times in the last 4 games I'm sure all the teams around us have been taking leads and giving them away in that time. But I guess we all should live in your never criticise world. We are playing better, but that might not last. No need for the pettiness, I'm clearly not saying don't ever criticise; I'm saying why only criticise when much of today was positive and that the bigger picture actually looks quite good for us at the moment in comparison to the team around us. Of course I'm going to focus on offering that perspective when I log on to see what is clearly overreaction and unduly harsh criticism for a team that is playing out of it's skin to keep us in the league. Hit the nail on the head and it’s staggering that people are having to point out the bigger picture..
-
Wolves fans being segregated from Wolves fans at Fulham
-
One of the few times I agree with you. People used to go mental when Pardew used to carry out similar approach. Sick of this moot point. Unfortunately although you want to see the positives of getting a point from a 2-0 lead, the subs were a major factor just as much as the misses,although for me the subs slightly effected how we attacked on the counter so thats why Im leaning toward the blame on the result being down to doing a shut up shop and hanging on for our lives job, when we looked quite comfortable. Ritchie was having a great game, kenedy looked a bit tired but he still offers plenty in terms of attack and creativity. I'm not seeing the positives from the result today, complete straw man. It's the "if Pardew did that" line. Boils my f***ing p*ss. Is that not something that did happen some seasons ago though? And it wasn't an if. It was he used to do it, and we all f***ing got annoyed. It's swings and roundabouts. Either we get a third and then hopefully kill the game or we make poor/negative subs and hang on inviting piles of pressure onto us and walking away with a draw or nearer the end it could have been a loss. Pardew had far better players at his disposal during his tenure, hence why people would get annoyed. This team has to play this way, Rafa's said so himself. This way would've got 3 points had Shelvey or Perez taken either of their chances. I would never agree those subs are good ideas and didn't cost us the game. So Perez and Shelvey's misses didn't cost us the game, it was all down to the subs? The disgraceful negative defensive tactics too - dont forget that.
-
Palace can’t go down like, Neesy assured me that Roy Hodgson is basically Sir Alex Ferguson.
-
West Brom and Chelsea as the last 2 home games couldn’t be any better for us like, may as well give us at least 4 extra points now. Two teams who will come here and roll over in pathetic fashion for different reasons.
-
Mitro (and Fulham) on Sky v Wolves. Might tip some over the edge if he plays well like.
-
3 of those away games are definitely winnable. Leicester clearly don’t give a shit, Everton hate their manager and don’t give a shit, Watford will be on the beach by then... Even 3 points away coupled with 6 at home would be enough for us. We’ll probably do better than that, I expect us to finish on about 40 or 41.
-
Woah, you don’t wanna come on here posting sense like that after a defeat good away point good performance good tactical performance disgraceful surrender. We're 2-0 up with two clear chances inches from the goal against a side who lost 4-1 in their last game to Huddersfield. I get that it's good to get away points, i'm all for that. Seriously though, if the positives of managing a draw overide your sense of absolutely throwing that away then fair fucking play. Before the game, most people were happy with a point? What’s changed? Aye, we were leading the game and comfortable, but we still got the point that everyone thought would be so good? Is it a bad point now? Do we not want it? It’s another point towards the total we need, in a game where we probably didn’t expect any. We’re still in good form (which people seem to forget) and we’ve got a relatively easy run-in compared to our rivals. We need what? 9 points to be on 38 and probably survive. I think people need to step back and look at the bigger picture.