Whitley mag

The only saving grace of a rejection, is the undoubted money I’d save on getting sucked back in again. I don’t think it’ll taste the same as my younger years with Keegan, but I’d love to see the city buzzing again. Last night was so depressing, i mean when the cameras panned across the city, the first thing that caught your eye was the state of the gallowgates roof. The place has been left to rot it is criminal.

Absolutely not a rejection means I’m finished for good. What do you think this club looks like post rejection, with less money and an even less interested owner ? Though I’ve flagged at times, my resolve for this to happen has not diminished one bit. There is no club worth supporting post rejection in my opinion.

I think it will be this week we find out either way. Just my opinion. For everyone’s sanity I hope your right. Caulkins tweet about documents moving was interesting, though he didn’t expand that would seem to suggest things are moving. I know, I know but please fu#%ing god.

This is why i'm intrigued because it feels like him asking in public is something that might p*ss Ashley off because it would suggest that Ashley isn't keeping him informed. I think your reading to much into it. Ashley might have a line to premier league but they’ll have told him it’s still under consideration. Bruce is simply frustrated as we are and is urging them to hurry up, or more likely trying to deflect from that shit show on the pitch tonight.

You sold that well from the off but fair play. I thought to mention it for those who are eternally optimistic, but doubt the story or aspects of the story. It would make sense if the club had mentioned it to the police force, but I doubt the Premier League would, as I doubt they will be making an announcement. I don’t think they would usually, but their seems some doubt in this case due to high profile nature of it. I personally think they will have to say something, even if it’s a very bland statement.

You sold that well from the off but fair play.

The premier league appear so far removed, they’ll probably think rejecting the takeover will give us the clarity we’re after, and we’ll all be happy to continue as we are.

My point is simply ex pros from big 6 clubs constantly set the agenda, and get free reign to spout their biased s#%te. We’ve all moaned about ex Man U and Liverpool pundits always on the box. I would just like to have seen something more passionate from him regarding this.

He works for them apparently so don’t underestimate his influence.

He works for them. He works for the bbc last time I checked. He does ambassadorial jobs for them from time to time. Well if that’s more important than the future of our club f#%K me. Shearer has always played the diplomat, he’s never going to just go off in a rant, he’s not Roy Keane. Agreed but f#%k me I would have loved a keano style rant to get across our frustrations.

To him it is, aye I’m sure he’s desperate for the cash.

He works for them. He works for the bbc last time I checked. He does ambassadorial jobs for them from time to time. Well if that’s more important than the future of our club f#%K me.

I'm sure the PL were shitting themselves in hope he didn't say anything. Do we complain when ex Man U and Liverpool players display pure bias and we accuse them of influencing the game ? My point being no opportunity should be missed to ram home this takeover has to happen for the sake of our club.

He works for them. He works for the bbc last time I checked.

Told you he’d say f*** all. He had it set up on a fu#%ing plate though

Shearer missed an open goal when lineker asked him about takeover, Gary even had to ask him if he wanted it to happen. Disappointed in the big man missed an open goal to stick it to premier league.

All top 6 clubs in last 4 just how the establishment like it.

As a club we are truly fu#%ed if this doesn’t happen, we’re here to simply make up the numbers how utterly depressing.

Who the f#%k wants to get to Wembley with no fans anyway.

Right team apart from Darlow.

He won’t. He might. He won’t, he works for the BBC and they and their presenters have to remain impartial. He’s a pundit who’s paid to give his opinion, there isn’t anything to stop him giving his point of view on takeover. To give opinions on games, that’s all not to take up the cause of NUFC by having a rant at the PL. He’ll hardly mention the takeover other than in general terms, i.e, the club is in limbo etc. He can talk about the situation at club as he sees fit. There only needs to be balance as in lineker chipping in with a token, obviously the premier league have to consider everything. He’s not a presenter or news reporter, not that it’s stopped Dan Roan from putting his unbiased view across.

Has some interesting insights into MBS I suppose, but the article itself comes to some weird conclusions. For instance claiming that he might not be better than Mike Ashley for the club because it's unlikely he'd spend well over £1 billion of his cash on transfers ?. Quite contradictory at times as far as the quotes and conclusions go. Aye can’t remember big mike spending a billion on transfers.

He won’t. He might. He won’t, he works for the BBC and they and their presenters have to remain impartial. He’s a pundit who’s paid to give his opinion, there isn’t anything to stop him giving his point of view on takeover.

He needs to stiffen the midfield up to have any chance, the 2 with Shelvey just exposes the back 4.

This looks like an interesting article for anyone with a telegraph subscription. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/06/28/special-report-complex-relationship-saudi-arabia-uae-could-soon