et tu brute

Thing is though the actual average was 46,000 up to the point when HE decided to do this and we still had (before Covid) Chelsea, Tottenham and Liverpool to play. The average would have been roughly the same for the full season.

You're right with the colours also, Fun88 logo is a different shade of green.

Although it's now protected, as Keegans Export said above, he had a line of code regarding the strip, which was missing from the actual code he linked to via the Castore site

If the option is available to immediately increase revenue by a substatial amount, then surely you will take it. You can then build into the contact increased payments regarding other things (i.e. higher league placing, European qualification). What happens if we don't have a good season next year, do you then wait until we do, whilst losing the increasd revenue?

I see his account is now protected, I wonder why .

Ir it might be it's a rolling contract or we can buy it out if not. Think we all agree we're all just guessing. Find out soon either way and we can all discuss our new sponsors or whine like fuck it's still Fun88 (I know I certainly will be if it is, mind I'll save money though I suppose).

Might as well just wait and see as nobody has a clue (and they never will) what the length of the contract actually is or what the contract details are. The two tweets today look to be very much fake.

For a start the new deal didn't start in 2017/18 it started in 2020/21.

You're not going to be able to access confidential contract details via something like that. They are always very confidential and not available to the public.

Maybe, we will see, don't think it will matter anyway as I don't think they will be the sponsor.

Just can't see it that's all, as I think the owners would want the sponsorship on the shirt in the Middle East to market the service or product (especially if it's a Saudi company). As I said above we will soon find out though.

I just can't see that sorry.

You don't know that, it could be rolling yearly contract (I would think it is more likely to be that). Soon enough find out though.

Yesh I think the fact Castore deleted their tweets earlier in the week was quite telling also. The away/third kit has obviously been designed for the Saudi market, so I just can't see why they would have gambling sponsorship if that was the case. It might be Fun88 we don't know for sure (or what the contract is), but I will be very surprised if it is.

You can easily edit the coding. I would honestly wait for official notice.

He did cancel one of his dates.

Since you don't know the contract or the length that's a moot point tbh.

That is so very easy to knock up on photoshop. Thought we would know better than take the word of a fan Twitter account with hardly any followers. Personally I would have posted that tweet in the Twitter nonsense thread.

If it's true (and to be honest I don't take much notice of reporters under the 'clickbait' days of today), then we need to just move onto the next target. Plenty of good quality defenders out there.

It's funny as fuck when you see them trying to redefine/reduce the borders of 'Geordie territory' due to one local musician from North Shields, stating he's a NUFC fans and having flags at a concert held in the area he comes from. Don't the thick fucks conveniently forget they used to sing songs claiming themselves as geordies in the 70s/early 80s

You're still wrong though, you said the club had to go through arbitration first. The laws of this land, supersede rules any establishment have in place.

So he still went through the process of starting an anti-competition claim and the hearing was heard before the arbitration case was concluded. He didn't wait for arbitration, which it what you were saying had to be done.

Did Ashley wait for arbitration with regards to the anti-competition case, nope he didn't.

Of course you can take them to court, what do you think Ashley did last year. Bollicks to getting round the rules through the takeover also. If a company has a case to present to the courts, then the laws of this land give the platform to do this. It's anti-competitive and restraint of trade.

It is when you compare the previous ownership and the lack of investment and the new ownership and their investment plans. If they don't buy it, then take them to court (or at least threaten to), as they wouldn't have a leg to stand on with regards to restraint of trade and anti-competition.