Jump to content

et tu brute

Member
  • Posts

    6,039
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by et tu brute

  1. Is it not the rugby? Weren't representatives in Saudi not so long ago
  2. No Tudor were definitely there as I used to pass it every day as I went to Benfield school
  3. Tudor were owned by Smiths
  4. Aye it used to be where the Barr's factory is now on Benfield Road just beside Crosslings.
  5. et tu brute

    Lloyd Kelly

    Sensible don't want another Fraser and Hendrick situation. If he comes up trumps I'm quite sure he will get an improved one
  6. The fact is they may get 15 million for Clarke (clubs have offered 13 million), but they won't get anywhere near 10 million for anyone else. You don't finish 16th with a team full of players with their imaginary costs, deluded fuckers
  7. Shows everything when they have nearly as many pages on us not qualifying for Europe as they did within one of the most important matches in their history
  8. That thread is still going I see, however now going into PIF buying shares in Milan, PIF getting bored and the old favourite of us having double the catchment area (even though the two clubs are less that 14 miles apart). They love a few lies over in mackem land
  9. If that's the case, would Chelsea not just take the Europa spot and Man U take up the Conference one?
  10. I'm just wondering what time are the Police knocking on our doors
  11. According to Wiki he did. Whether that is correct or not
  12. They try and use he's a Newcastle fan anyway line now
  13. If he doesn't sign then fine, you don't want anyone who is not committed to coming. He would be absolutely fine for a free transfer, but I do have some understanding that he may be more keen on Chelsea due to firstly being able to not move home and secondly (currently) European football. He would probably play more games here than at Man Utd or Chelsea, so we do have that going for us
  14. Like the takeover they might be laughing a bit soon IF Chelsea drop out/kicked out of the conference
  15. Howe has already said that the owners will have the final say. Pure profit for any fee and you have Miley coming through
  16. Got to be moved on this summer as everything is pure profit and he's nowhere near the level we need either. Need every penny we can get to count this summer
  17. I agree and that's why next season is key to try and ensure we don't lose those players.
  18. You're not going to have that squad if we have a similar season to this next year. Bruno/Isak/Gordon will probably be away for a start. Currently it's vital for Europa League at worst and obviously Champions League at best to progress the squad and revenue streams. Winning a trophy next year would be fantastic, but his job won't be measured on this target. However, failure to get Europa League as a minimum, will see him gone. That's being realistic as the owners have already stated about finishing regular in top 6 places within the league.
  19. Maybe the actual competition, but if you include match day revenue if we went all the way, then you're looking at 7 home games, then it would be a lot more
  20. I've already said the three (Bruno/Isac/Gordon), will be here next season, it will be a totally different thing if we have a similar season to this next year.
  21. And Brighton, we were in a great position and fucked it so we can't really complain when we're relying on other teams
  22. I'm convinced he'll still be here, but it's pointless getting concerned about it. If a club activates the clause then there is nothing we can do about it. Fortunately there is a deadline, so either way it's not going to run all summer
×
×
  • Create New...