et tu brute

Never going to happen in a million years man

Someone who has access to the parsnip thread post this that will shut the racist fucker up

So the thick cunt talking more crap about us. I can't remember the racist twat getting anything right when it comes to us and yet he still continues

What thread is that in?

I've always thought of Matt Slater as a right twat personally, so I'm not surprised

Aye Crinkly Granny Janey

36.000 my arse, hms pisstheleague taking in water, out of the automatics and other teams closing in - oh dear

I see the thread on last night's match still ongoing. Total cowards as usual, as it's usually parsnipped straight away virtually every time we win. Let's see the excuses tonight when their crowd is missing by the thousands (made up club attendance aside) due to Nissan nightshift, live on Sky, too cold, North Sea and the infestation of Durham mags taking over.

Ot's not a one off though, that exact type of performance has been quite frequent. That second half though was terrible in terms of game management. Just was a case of switching layers to different positions to see if something would come off

Who could have predicted your response to that reaction. Why don't you contribute to the discussion instead of trying to sneer at other people's opinions

I agree, but people need to get their heads out of the sand, as the problems are happening far too many times. It's not looking at individual games, it's looking at a collective of games over the season. The same errors and poor play are occurring far too many times

I said in the match thread that it's happening too many times that level of performance and questions have to be asked. It's not a one off and the same mistakes are being made on and off the pitch.

Same things are springing up all season, questions have got to start being asked

Does anyone know when the tribunals response is due, has it been mentioned by anyone?

And the other clubs at the top are either level or just behind them. I said last month that the games they had were all against the teams placed in the bottom half of the table. They won't go up automatically and I doubt they will be in a play off position either. They will stink the lower leagues out for a few more years yet.

Yeah Ferry definitely a fan as are his sons which he has mentioned before in a interview

Different league (literally) level wise. If somehow we did go up, basically would need not far off a new team. We have a few players out defensively though, but the gap level is big.

I don't really like either music wise, it's just great to see how wound up they are about Fender

That Roker Mackem and Sofatester are the two of the biggest faux outrage cunts (except for Exile who has disappeared from the scene) and comment continuously about us. The fuckers as a whole lie about everything and make up scenarios to try and justify themselves. Just look at the Sam Fender thread to see it in full glory.

Yeah the Premier League will go back stating that they have changed the rules and City will argue that the rules are still unlawful. It's the reason why the premier league didn't wait for the tribunal clarification

It's an arbitration tribunal set up by the Premier League within their rules. With one nomination from the Premier League, one for City and a joint agreement by both for the 3rd (otherwise appointed by the FA if no agreement). We are still waiting for the tribunal's written explanation, to confirm if the rules in their entirety are unlawful. The rules voted for today could be quickly thrown out if that explanation states unlawful, otherwise they will remain if the tribunal decides it is lawful (unlikely in my opinion, but then again I though the vote would have been pulled yesterday). I honestly think this has been rushed through to attempt to stop open season when/if the tribunal decision comes through in agreement with City's argument. This gives the Premier League time to further kick the can down the road (as we know they love to do). I agree that it is corrupt and totally unacceptable how another club (or 16 in this case) can basically stop an individual club from running and investing in its own business. People say, but it's a football club and needs to be governed. This is correct in terms of the rules of the game and what happens on the pitch, but football clubs (like it or not) are first and foremost businesses and shouldn't have their investment curtailed by another club (business). I wish either us or City (or the actual sponsor) would say no I'm not accepting your corrupt process and take it to the competition/external courts as the whole thing would be blown apart. Premier League may attempt to throw the clubs out, but I'm quite sure the government would get seriously involved then (as they threatened during the Super League). Hopefully we will get the tribunal explanation promptly and see what happens with that. The PSR and APT rules are both totally anti competitive and would not be allowed in any other industry.

Stupid thing is that the airport limits are at Woolsington, so which are also within the city limits. Not like the mackems to get their facts wrong

Because they have to fly from Newcastle to get to Spain . As for Sam Fender, if he was a mackem, then he would be the greatest talent in music today. We have had these two topics and the Premier League vote today (showing up their faux outrage as usual) and yet not a whisper on the new stadium talk, I wonder if that is because it kills their pie in the sky hopes of PIF leaving. Let's see in a few weeks when they are struggling for a play off place

The new stadium is happening and people against need to get on board with that. The arguments about moving stadium doesn't guarantee you winning things is frankly pathetic. The reason we will be moving is to increase revenue streams, which will be double that of staying at SJP as quoted the other night. We will also give the opportunity for more supporters to attend and that is also important. We also have then the cost of extending SJM is huge for the limited number of seats it would give us and also result in lost revenue during the period that the extension takes place. Absolute no brainer all round

This was according to reports, whether those reports were correct is another thing