Matt1892

Obviously must be lying. In fact, we probably didn’t even have FFP problems at all. No proof.😂

Someone from Liverpool would know that we offered Gordon to them. Yes, that is how it works.

There you go.

Presuming that MGW isn’t really a RW, although is capable of covering there.

Again, you will happily ignore a verified source of information because you don’t want to believe it to be true.

I am saying that a varied party has told the BBC, that there is no reason to disbelieve. There isn’t anything to say that it isn’t true, other than people not wanting to believe it is, despite the club facing a hefty points deduction if we didn’t sell.

What are you going by to say it isn’t correct?

The privately owned media I would say yes, the publicly owned media no. As I said, they are not interested in click bait material or the latest transfer scoop. If anything their football coverage on the website is bland as they don’t write an article on anything without having it verified. They would likely have been told this by Liverpool, which the BBC believe is enough to make it factual and have given us the right to respond, which we don’t appear to have done.

The Athletic article doesn’t put the club in the best of light behind the scenes, the last week must have been difficult but hopefully it makes us more open to selling players at the right time going forward.

The BBC are again repeating the story of us offering Gordon to Liverpool with Quansah coming the other way, that Liverpool rejected. There is no reason to believe they are lying about it, they are not click bait journalists on Twitter but a publicly owned media outlet. They have even reached out to us for comment.

Oscar Bobb if we can get him. It might be possible if City are getting Savio.

The problem with that is that we go in to next summer with £0 towards a new striker, where as if he goes now then potentially we £15m+ towards one. Unless the plan is to plan is to pick up DCL on a free, but if his demands were too much this season then they are likely to go up when out of contract.

You could make the case that every player is sold for PSR concerns unless you are a club that makes regular profits every window but the sale of Anderson was a no brainer.

Swiss Ramble predicted £40 million.

The only way we could avoid the issues of PSR is by selling players and he was actively working for us through the January window.

I read it at the time and know he helped upgrade the training ground from the days of a plunge pool being a garden waste bin. I am not talking down his abilities, I just don’t think he has left any sort of legacy in his time here for things he has drastically improved.

Glad a line is being drawn under this, anything more than what we paid Brighton is a bonus. I am still not sure what he actually did in his time here.

Lee Dixon talking like it has been a masterclass by Southgate.

First shot on target!😂

Ivan Toney coming on with 3 minutes of injury time left.😂

Southgate.😂 Shame he didn’t go to Man Utd.

If we did then this would cause the rule change to come in. It is difficult to value youngsters with potential but signing a 30 year old 3rd choice keeper for big money would set the alarm bells off.

Forest paid £7.7 million for him. https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport/football/transfer-news/odysseas-vlachodimos-fresh-nottingham-forest-9098131.amp

K m8 lol

Even if we signed Mamardashvili?