Erikse

Most medias will ignore this, because they need something to write about that will get them the clicks..

What also happens when you go to a better club is that you get less space in most games. It's just a very different way of playing.

Spent 4 points bringing in Ederson and put Pickford on the bench. I really thought Brentford would score, they have been doing that a lot lately, and has Mbeumo back. Got really punished..

It's been repeated like 3 times haha. Sheffield United has already broken the 38 game one. To be fair this season probably has longer games than any other 38 game season, and therefore there has been a lot of goals.

Allways loved VAR

All that Toney hype, he is not really showing his worth this season.

I hereby apologize for saying earlier in the season that I can't understand why people think he's our best player. I now fully understand it.

Wouldn't be the first time these Man Utd games has even more drama at the end though.

Penalty for Burnley

Pen Burnley?

I missed the first quotes haha..

We're essentially playing at home against a Championship side, who also has 10 men out injured for this game. They actually have more injuries than us. Regardless, Longstaff and Anderson should be better than what they've got.

We took 5 points in the last 5 or something like that. Drawing against Leeds and almost giving away the game at home against Leicester, a game that we should never lose. But we did get it over the line in the end.

Keep giving the ball away too easily with shit passes in the final third, just like vs Palace.

Was it £300m they turned down for Salah last summer? Wild.

I actually think he has been better than Szobo, but haven't watched them that much.

And Liverpool will not win the league either way. Couldn't care less about whether they get 2nd or 3rd. They will probably get 3rd either way aswell.

Which is odd considering that Liverpool winning gets them nothing..

That's completely different from saying that they are. And if he did, it would be easy for me to find it. I don't think that it's wrong to talk about court cases, unless you actually say someone is guilty, which he didn't. He knows how to word himself in these cases in a way that everyone knows what he means, but he doesn't actually say it. That way he avoids the trouble, or avoid being told that he was wrong, in which he can just say "I didn't say that". That sly bugger.

The articles are writing everything that he is saying on the podcasts, in quotes. It's not something that he is writing himself. I saw videos aswell, there is no video of him saying that they ARE guilty. You could still give me an example it I'm wrong on that. As I said he is just criticising them for how they deal with the process, he never said that they ARE guilty. Insinuating shouldn't really be illegal, are journalist all supposed to talk about how they must be innocent? "Oh they are sabotaging the investigation, but you know, they probably have their reason since they must be innocent." That would definetly not be one sided. Saying that people who refuse to cooperate in investigations are usually guilty is just a pure fact.

2 months is quite minor for us, to be fair. Everything is relative.

Haven't checked on Carragher, but I have now looked through different articles on Simon Jordan comments regarding the case. As I said he is criticising how they are handling the investigation etc., and saying that if you are innocent then it should be easy for you to prove it. Which is true. Not a single time does he seem to say that they ARE guilty. He has however said that IF they are guilty, they should be punished very hard. But that's not saying that they are. I'm not a fan of Simon Jordan, but lets not put words into his mouth. Or maybe you could show me an example?

Hmm haven't heard anyone say that personally. I think the criticism from for example talksport was about things like Man City doing everything they can to slow down and almost sabotage the investigation. Which obviously is highly suspicious, considering that someone who is innocent would usually not want to do these thing, and rather just prove their innocence and get it over with. But again I can't remember hearing them say that they are guilty for certain.

To try to protect clubs like Man City. They knew about the breaches, and let them go with a fine, until someone was pushing for an independent investigation. Isn't that what happened?