henke Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Ayoze was a false 9 for us last season. Only difference between him and Messi was we surrounded him with 10 spaps who couldn't thread the ball through a bus station. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 False 9 is an actual thing though. Explain... seriously! http://thefalse9.com/2013/09/football-tactics-for-beginnersthe-false-9.html Bull s***, number 9s the world over, i.e. main centre-forwards have often dropped deep. Cole wasn't a penalty box striker nor was Shearer or Sir Les. Messi isn't a false number 9, he's a playmaker, an attacking forward. He's not a centre-forward or a striker or a midfielder or a winger. Not really, it's been called that on the continent long before Messi arrived.... Cruyff was considered one at points his career as was Puskas for Hungary. It's just that it wasn't termed that way in this country till Barcelona popularized it, but it's not some made up media term which only exists because someone popularized it. Like Tiki-taka for example, which is a term made up in the media that doesn't actually exist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Cole wasn't a penalty box striker? For us? He f***ing lived there man, the Premier League charged the poor f***er rent. Was he f***. He was always involved in play deeper back. Howay man, false number 9? Its bullshuttler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom1988 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 The false 9 plays just in front of the shuttler. Everybody knows that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 False number 9 doesn't mean everything but a pure goal poacher though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 The false 9 plays just in front of the shuttler. Everybody knows that! Casper sure did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I think a side should be moulded with different players variable abilities. Since no player is the same, I think it's wrong to strangle a line up with made up ideals, which almost never match a players attribute. For example, Makelele and Pirlo would both be classed as defensive midfielders in my mind but both are vastly different players. If you were constructing a team, you wouldn't necessarily pair them with the same sort of player, therefore the term "defensive midfielder", becomes somewhat redundant. To simplify, a side is picked with players not positions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Makelele = defensive midfielder Pirlo = playmaker IMO! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Playmaker is the worst footballing term. Of course Pirlo is a playmaker, he's also a defensive midfielder. Beckham was a playmaker and also a winger. Which is kind of the point. Every player is different. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Striker/Forward/Targetman/False number 9 All variables on the same thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Makelele = defensive midfielder Pirlo = playmaker IMO! I'm with you on everything else btw but false 9 is an actual term which has been in football for decades, all these shuttler nonsense is made up crap by random internet blog merchants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 False 9 is an actual thing though. Explain... seriously! http://thefalse9.com/2013/09/football-tactics-for-beginnersthe-false-9.html Bull shit, number 9s the world over, i.e. main centre-forwards have often dropped deep. Cole wasn't a penalty box striker nor was Shearer or Sir Les. Messi isn't a false number 9, he's a playmaker, an attacking forward. He's not a centre-forward or a striker or a midfielder or a winger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 So was Dennis Bergkamp a false9? All I would say was that he was a striker who dropped deep. No need for labels. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I'd personally say a false 9 can only exist when there's one man up front, might be wrong though. The point is that they're more withdrawn than the wide forwards but still the fulcrum of the attack, I thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 So was Dennis Bergkamp a false9? All I would say was that he was a striker who dropped deep. No need for labels. Not in a sense because he didn't play upfront by himself, it's basically a striker who played in between a traditional 9 and a traditional 10 and performs the roles of both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom1988 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I was under the impression that they're not the focus and therefore drift back and try to drag defenders out of position so that any one of the other talented attacking players get chances to score. This is why it works really well for Barca/Spain etc and you don't see the likes of Allardyce/Pards playing with one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 They have been sort of sussed out now anyway, which is why Barca have gone back to more "conventional" methods and Messi's gone back to playing on the right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I think with a better partner you could get another season out of him. Totally agree! There is no point in debating Colo with Ron as it's blatantly obvious that the curly-haired one has bummed his pet dog or budgie! More to do with the fact I don't like gutless error-prone cowards captaining my football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AY Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I thought shuttler was perfectly sensible word for a certain role? Someone that plays a bit like box to box midfielder, Italy NT used them frequently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndegwa Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Cole wasn't a penalty box striker? For us? He f***ing lived there man, the Premier League charged the poor f***er rent. Was he f***. He was always involved in play deeper back. Howay man, false number 9? Its bullshuttler Watch like 90% of his goals man. Les lived in the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Cole wasn't a penalty box striker? For us? He f***ing lived there man, the Premier League charged the poor f***er rent. Was he f***. He was always involved in play deeper back. Howay man, false number 9? Its bullshuttler Watch like 90% of his goals man. Les lived in the box. Not sure how this ended up with Les Ferdinand, but I remember he scored a goal with his arse from closer to the half way line than the opposing goal vs Dmitri Kharine. Man's a legend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 False 9 is a role in a system, not a type of player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 False 9 is a role in a system, not a type of player. Agreed, unless a specialist. Totti was a false 9 before Messi in recent memory. Bergkamp was a #10. Pirlo is a Regista/deep lying midfielder. Inside forward is another top position that's made a comeback. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I wouldn't have Colo anywhere near the team. Of the senior CBs we've got I'd only start him ahead of Williamson. I wouldn't quite give up on him under McClaren, a defensive coach whose game-plan is based on defence, possession and being compact and functional. I think Colo could perform quite well under McClaren and his methods. He's a busted flush though, he has been poor for 2-3 seasons now. I'd personally keep him, but would rather we replaced him in the starting 11. Sounds like a bad idea for a Newcastle manager at SJP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Cole wasn't a penalty box striker? For us? He f***ing lived there man, the Premier League charged the poor f***er rent. Was he f***. He was always involved in play deeper back. Howay man, false number 9? Its bullshuttler Literally the biggest bullshit opinion I've ever heard about a player. Andy Cole wasn't a penalty box striker? You may as well say that Inzaghi was never offside, it's that ludicrous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now