Parky Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I certainly don't. It's the most ridiculous idea doing the rounds. He needs to manage somewhere else first and develop his skills as a manager (make his mistakes and learn more about himself), in no way should he return and make us his first full time managerial post. Madness. For the record we don't have to sack Allardyce as he could do a good job upstairs and continue his behind the scenes revolution which from all accounts is working and developing the infrastructure for success in the long term. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Second most ridiculous idea doing the rounds imo, just barely being beaten out by the "Sam is trying to get sacked for a payoff" nonsense. I don't want him here right now myself but Shearer will be here if we sack sam though. I can't see anyone else taking the job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shido Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 later....will be heartbreaking when he doesn't win anything with us either tho..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Second most ridiculous idea doing the rounds imo, just barely being beaten out by the "Sam is trying to get sacked for a payoff" nonsense. Shearer will be here if we sack sam though. I can't see anyone else taking the job. That is definitely ridiculous.Anyway back to the topic,I dont want Shearer either,for now at least.Get me the special one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I don't want Shearer but I'm resigned to the fact that if Allardyce goes Shearer will be the man chosen to step in. I personnally think we should go for someone like Klinsmann or Deschamps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I certainly don't. It's the most ridiculous idea doing the rounds. He needs to manage somewhere else first and develop his skills as a manager (make his mistakes and learn more about himself), in no way should he return and make us his first full time managerial post. Madness. Yeah, just like Keegan did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I cannot see why people would think he could just walk into the job and do it better than the already established coaches out there, it would be a silly risk to take and one that i don't think Mort and Ashley will go for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Allez Gerard Houllier! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 in a way i'd quite like us to appoint him just to fucking get it out of the way, whether he'd do well or not, who can say, it doesnt usually go well for people with such little experience though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Not keen on him being the next manager but I do think that he will continue to cast a huge shadow over future managers until he has had a go himself. I don't think he would want to manage in the lower leagues either for experience. But to be fair to him he has always tried to distance himself from the job but the media and many fans won't let it go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I certainly don't. It's the most ridiculous idea doing the rounds. He needs to manage somewhere else first and develop his skills as a manager (make his mistakes and learn more about himself), in no way should he return and make us his first full time managerial post. Madness. Yeah, just like Keegan did. Well, it might work in the way Keegan did but why take what is such a huge risk? Not many people go on to do well in their first job at a big club (which we are, without wishing to get into that debate). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 SHEARER OUT !!! << looks good! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzrahog Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I voted get him now. This will not go away until he has had his turn in teh hot seat, might as well do it now. If it works brilliant, if it does not then at least it puts teh subject to bed once and for all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 one that i don't think Mort and Ashley will go for. You can't know that for certain. Mort and Ashley have only made one football decision without the help of Allardyce, and that was to rubber stamp Allardyce's appointment. They have very few footballing contacts, and their football knowledge is generally unknown. Therefore, although they may appoint someone good, they currently cant be trusted to make the right decision as they have no track record whatsoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 one that i don't think Mort and Ashley will go for. You can't know that for certain. Probably why he wrote 'I don't think'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Klinsmann would be a good move IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Yes and Mourinho is a good example of that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Yes and Mourinho is a good example of that. He's a pretty bad example. Defensive pragmatist who gets the most of his players through motivation and good tactics. I'd love him here but he doesn't have an 'attacking philosophy'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I can see why some want him and others don't, for me it's too much of a risk that we don't need to take. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Yes and Mourinho is a good example of that. He's a pretty bad example. Defensive pragmatist who gets the most of his players through motivation and good tactics. I'd love him here but he doesn't have an 'attacking philosophy'. true, just because you win a lot it doesn't mean your philosophy is attacking Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 I can see why some want him and others don't, for me it's too much of a risk that we don't need to take. Yep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Yes and Mourinho is a good example of that. He's a pretty bad example. Defensive pragmatist who gets the most of his players through motivation and good tactics. I'd love him here but he doesn't have an 'attacking philosophy'. But he has a very 'successful philosophy'.Of course we want to see our team to attack,but if youre successful without doing much attacking,I think that is better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What we need is a manager with some pedigree and experience who has an attacking philosophy. It really is that simple. Any manager with these qualities would get the time he needs. Yes and Mourinho is a good example of that. He's a pretty bad example. Defensive pragmatist who gets the most of his players through motivation and good tactics. I'd love him here but he doesn't have an 'attacking philosophy'. But he has a very 'successful philosophy'.Of course we want to see our team to attack,but if youre successful without doing much attacking,I think that is better. You were the one who said he was a good example of a manager with an attacking philosophy though you fuck-wit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now