Realistic Summer Targets

[David Icke - Son of God]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but   the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

[Guest MaetihS]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but   the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

[junkhead]

fuck off

[Wullie]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but  the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

 

Like you've ever seen him play ffs.

[Guest MaetihS]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but   the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

 

Like you've ever seen him play ffs.

 

a handful. but does not take a brilliant scout to know Guthrie's worth. may turn out to be a 10m player but currently, god.....even Bolton rejected the option to sign him. even if he has a brilliant first season, still only one season and max worth 5m.

[GM]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but  the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

 

Like you've ever seen him play ffs.

 

a handful. but does not take a brilliant scout to know Guthrie's worth. may turn out to be a 10m player but currently, god.....even Bolton rejected the option to sign him. even if he has a brilliant first season, still only one season and max worth 5m.

 

Can someone please change this poster's username to Sklattihs

[ATB]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but  the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

 

Like you've ever seen him play ffs.

 

a handful. but does not take a brilliant scout to know Guthrie's worth. may turn out to be a 10m player but currently, god.....even Bolton rejected the option to sign him. even if he has a brilliant first season, still only one season and max worth 5m.

 

you are a fucking joke. can´t you just shut up or go somewhere else and moan or something.

[Guest optimistic nit]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but  the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

 

i dont want us to spend over 10 million on a player if we dont think that hes going to improve us by that amount, but if we go through another window (3) without spending decent money, then it will look like we are unwilling to part with that money, even if a good player is to be had for that amount.

it is illogical for me to want us to spend money, without taking into account the players ability, but at the same time if we are consistantly spending very little in transfer windows then we will not improve. if the board cant find anyone worth spending 10m on, then they shouldn´t spend that money, although shepheard may have, but if they can but bite their fingernails and miss out then they cant afford to do that in the transfer market.

 

[Guest optimistic nit]

i dont know why i even bothered posting in this thread like, you can get fuck all rational debate

[fredbob]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

[Guest MaetihS]

Aye the buy em young make em top layers and sell them idea, suppose we shall see in the next 3 to 4 years.

 

http://www.premiershiplatest.com/news/newcastle-consider-making-offer-young-fr-5512096.html

Newcastle Consider Transfer Offer For Young French Striker Monnet-Paquet

Submitted by Jake Briggs on Mon, 2008-07-14 18:11. Newcastle United Premiership Transfer News

 

Newcastle United are tracking young French striker Kevin Monnet-Paquet, who is currently playing for RC Lens in France.

 

19-year-old Monnet-Paquet made his debut for the Lens in 2006 on his 17th birthday, but is not prepared to play in Ligue 2 following Lens’ relegation last season from Ligue 1, the top-flight of French football.

 

Magpie scouts have been alert to this development, with it thought that the Premier League club are considering making an offer for the talented youngster to bring him to St James’ Park, according to reports in France.

 

great, but im starting to think that the board think that they can get to the top third of the league by this strategy alone.

this will sound impatient and illogical, and it is, but if we dont sign someone for over 10million this summer i will be concerned, not because buying players worth that much guarentees that they are good, but if we go 2 seasons without spending any serious money it wont say much for our ambition.

 

i think we are being run much better than we were under shepheard, and that we are going in the right direction, but if we are not going to spend then we wont succeed. maybe its part of some grand scheme to get the club turning a decent profit before spending big, but   the forum is going to get even worse (if possible) and quickly if we dont spend.

 

in order to keep up with citeh, and spurs we would need to spend money that would only be pheaseable with CL football. and liverpool spurs and citeh will also have to spend that amount. only one of those teams will get it though, and it may not be the same team each season, so as long as we continue to improve i dont care if citeh and spurs get further ahead of us, for the time being, because if all 3 are intent on chasing CL football, it will probably end very badly for at least 2 of them.

 

we still need to be spending money regardless of whether we compete with spurs and citeh however, we have apparently tried and failed so far, but we need to succeed.

thats not to say spurs or citeh´s spending guarentees them success however, but it gives them a better chance.

 

im not going to be happy until smith, viduka, barton and duff are off the wage bill though.

 

 

 

 

dont know if any of the above is coherent and/or makes sense.

It doesn't make any sense. You complete lost me when you said you wanted us to sign someone for over ten million but then admitted it doesn't guarentee a player will be good. If we signed Guthrie for over £10 million will you be happy or up in arms?

its obvious he meant he a good player or proven/experienced player whose ability is worth 10m. will ask for MA's head if he splashed 3m on Guthrie let alone 10m. his current ability is no more than 2m.

 

Like you've ever seen him play ffs.

 

a handful. but does not take a brilliant scout to know Guthrie's worth. may turn out to be a 10m player but currently, god.....even Bolton rejected the option to sign him. even if he has a brilliant first season, still only one season and max worth 5m.

 

you are a f***ing joke. can´t you just shut up or go somewhere else and moan or something.

 

sorry i wont cos as long as there are others who agree with me, i will be here. can see more and more like-mined pple speaking along my tunes. besides, i make more sense than most your posts which comprise of asking pple to leave, calling names ,,,,basically meaningless stuff.

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

if u have read my posts, i always say we are bigger than mackems. in fact, my expectation for next seson is just to finish above them. as for other clubs, we are smaller than villa, spurs, portsmouth, man city in terms of player quality and increasingingly so, in pulling power as well.

[ATB]

ok.

 

for years under Shepherd we have spent silly money and silly salaries at so called "trophy signings". BUT. Please answer me. How many trophies have we won? And how much glory have they given us? And how much money are we spending in salaries at shit players that just sit at there arse and take place?

 

Now another person have take the charge of the club and he has a new strategy. That is to not splash silly money at old players that so many times has failed. Instead we want young cheap players that want to play for the club and if they don´t succeed, OK they wasn´t that expensive anyway.

This have been implanted for one year and it is just unbelievable how some people hear are moaning that we don´t have ambitions bla bla bla. It make me sick. when we failed with "trophy signings" and now they won´t even try this!

 

Give it time we have got so far behind other clubs with that strategy. Let´s try this.

 

Though I promise we can question the board if they (when) we start to compete with Arsenal etc. But now. Shot the fuck up!

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

i never say we have no hope of signing good players. all in relative terms. i will find larsson a good and realistic signing. clubs like the others may find larsson not a good signing cos they can attract better. but for us this is a good player. also, i say players that are more famous, rising stars or star players will not find us attractive but does not mean we cannot sign a 6-8 m player or 10m good player. star players and players that bigger clubs attract are worth at least 15m. in fact, i find Crouch a good and possible signing but he preferred Pompey.

to me, Guthrie is not a good player that will improve us.

[Unlucky Luque]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

i never say we have no hope of signing good players. all in relative terms. i will find larsson a good and realistic signing. clubs like the others may find larsson not a good signing cos they can attract better. but for us this is a good player. also, i say players that are more famous, rising stars or star players will not find us attractive but does not mean we cannot sign a 6-8 m player or 10m good player. star players and players that bigger clubs attract are worth at least 15m. in fact, i find Crouch a good and possible signing but he preferred Pompey.

to me, Guthrie is not a good player that will improve us.

 

Nobody expects Guthrie to make a huge impact. He is young FFS, and he will most likely improve with time. Have you been personally scouting him the last few years or something and come to that conclusion?

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

[Wullie]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

 

Like Kevin Keegan?

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

i never say we have no hope of signing good players. all in relative terms. i will find larsson a good and realistic signing. clubs like the others may find larsson not a good signing cos they can attract better. but for us this is a good player. also, i say players that are more famous, rising stars or star players will not find us attractive but does not mean we cannot sign a 6-8 m player or 10m good player. star players and players that bigger clubs attract are worth at least 15m. in fact, i find Crouch a good and possible signing but he preferred Pompey.

to me, Guthrie is not a good player that will improve us.

 

Nobody expects Guthrie to make a huge impact. He is young FFS, and he will most likely improve with time. Have you been personally scouting him the last few years or something and come to that conclusion?

 

like i said in previous posts, know he is for the future if he has any. but what i meant is i will be seriously depressed if these kind of "future" signings make the bulk of our signings.

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

 

Like Kevin Keegan?

 

dunno abt that....yes a legend in our world but outside that and England....debatable.

[midds]

Genuinely think MaetihS could be the best WUM we've ever had on here. His 'bites:bait' ratio is staggering. 

[Dave]

Genuinely think MaetihS could be the best WUM we've ever had on here. His 'bites:bait' ratio is staggering. 

 

Agreed.

[Yorkie]

Genuinely think MaetihS could be the best WUM we've ever had on here. His 'bites:bait' ratio is staggering. 

 

Was thinking the same thing. If people just didn't respond to his posts then everything would be so much rosier in the N-O garden. He's a WUM leave him and he'll leave us.

[Wullie]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

 

Like Kevin Keegan?

 

dunno abt that....yes a legend in our world but outside that and England....debatable.

 

  Proof if ever it were needed that you're fucking clueless.

 

Fuck off midds.

[midds]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

 

Like Kevin Keegan?

 

dunno abt that....yes a legend in our world but outside that and England....debatable.

 

  Proof if ever it were needed that you're fucking clueless.

 

Fuck off midds.

 

Just ignore him man! Just read it, laugh, and move on. 

[Guest MaetihS]

Just out of interest DaehtihS, who do you think are a bigger and better club nufc or the mackems?

 

Also, if we have no hope of signing good players, becasue "we are such a small club" then how did Man City manage it last season? In the past 10 yearsm Man Citys hightest finish was something like 9th, how do you account for them being able to sign the likes of Elano, Corulka and Petrov etc? Surely if they can manage it with there history then we can with ours, theres absolutely no question bout it, club for club the most pessimisitc would say we were equal, (Stadium, Finance, recent history) but the ones with half a brain wiuld all say we have had a far better recent history, so what your verdict? This example contravenes anything you've actually said.

 

Dont tell me any rubbish about finance either because you havent used that line beofre in your "realistic" views so i wouldnt expect that explanaition now.

 

a manager that is famous does helps. speaks out your intentions. so does the new chairman who has expressed publicly his ambitions to tackle the top 4. them spending quite a bit last season also signals serious intentions. something like what we were. agreed may not work. maybe our Everton kind of method as it looks like this season will work better. mind u, will love to be the next everton. only time will tell.

 

Like Kevin Keegan?

 

dunno abt that....yes a legend in our world but outside that and England....debatable.

 

  Proof if ever it were needed that you're f***ing clueless.

 

f*** off midds.

 

just prove how deluded we can be and no wonder the easiest laughing stock in the league. easily say Sven and Ramos have 5x the pulling power than KK has currently. come on, a legend i admit but to outsiders a manager that wins nought and famous for bottling.