Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Keep him. He's finally starting to hit a run of form and keeping fit, with the right signings in the summer to help him out he could become a very important player for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Cut our losses and get whatever we can for him this summer. Or retrain him as an attacking mid and improve his game. Who saw that coming! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Sell... this is Michael Owen we are talking about here and he has only had a couple of months with Keegan Madness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Keep him. He's finally starting to hit a run of form and keeping fit, with the right signings in the summer to help him out he could become a very important player for us. I think he's just finally fit. I hate the term "Match fit" but it's certainly the first chance he's had to hit his stride at the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Keep him. He's finally starting to hit a run of form and keeping fit, with the right signings in the summer to help him out he could become a very important player for us. I think he's just finally fit. I hate the term "Match fit" but it's certainly the first chance he's had to hit his stride at the club. I think Michael hates that term too. Remember his rant! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Exactly. But Sven is willing to throw silly money at players he wants. If he pays well we have loadsamoney. If he doesn't we still have Michael Owen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Looks as though KK wants to keep him so thats all that matters really,he wants him to stay I am sure he will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 give him a new contract, since he's been up to full fitness he's been head and shoulders above all our other attacking players, a few missed chances but he's still scoring and at the end of the day thats what counts edit - i accept he's not getting any younger but with the sharp end of his pace now gone anyway, what do we have to worry about apart from injuries? fair enough its a concern but he's had a good run of games recently and it seems like he might have finally turned a corner. also with his proven ability at playing the deeper role we know he's a LOT more adaptable than some would have you believe i just dont think a club in our position should be wanting to offload a player as good as him, doesnt make sense to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Exactly. But Sven is willing to throw silly money at players he wants. If he pays well we have loadsamoney. If he doesn't we still have Michael Owen He has a release cause that makes him available in the summer & it is meant to go down in value, so last year it was £9 million, this summer it is meant to be £6 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Exactly. But Sven is willing to throw silly money at players he wants. If he pays well we have loadsamoney. If he doesn't we still have Michael Owen He has a release cause that makes him available in the summer & it is meant to go down in value, so last year it was £9 million, this summer it is meant to be £6 million. Newcastle United chairman Chris Mort has revealed Michael Owen no longer has a buy-out clause in his contract. Owen joined United from Real Madrid for £17million in August 2005 but his career on Tyneside has been blighted by injury so far. There has been recent speculation about Owen's future but Magpies chairman Mort claims there is no chance he could leave for a low fee. He said: "There was a clause in Michael's contract which allowed him to leave for a certain fee during the last transfer window and the summer before that as well, but that sort of clause does not exist any longer." http://www.premierleague.com/page/Headlines/0,,12306~1145251,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Despite the last couple of games i stand by what i said. 2 games does make a season and i just don't see him being a long term success here. Disappointed to see Keegan is desperate to keep him, hopefully the men upstairs and/or Michael himself take a different view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Despite the last couple of games i stand by what i said. 2 games does make a season and i just don't see him being a long term success here. Disappointed to see Keegan is desperate to keep him, hopefully the men upstairs and/or Michael himself take a different view. 2 games? He's scored 4 in 7. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Despite the last couple of games i stand by what i said. 2 games does make a season and i just don't see him being a long term success here. Disappointed to see Keegan is desperate to keep him, hopefully the men upstairs and/or Michael himself take a different view. 2 games? He's scored 4 in 7. Fair enough he played well in the Boro game aswell. But still this isn't enough to make me change my mind, i'll need to see a prolonged run of form to make me forget the previous 2 and a half years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 i thought keegan said contract renewals weren't even being considered for the time being. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 i thought keegan said contract renewals weren't even being considered for the time being. That was for shit players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 I've not been a fan of Owen's since he came here, but I thought on Saturday he was terrific, hs work rate was sport on and I think he's really enjoying playing in this new position. One thing you have got to say KK has done a great job on getting him back in the mood to play football again. I geniunely thought Owen had lost his desire, but he seems to be truely enjoying his football again and that's all down to KK. If Owen keeps up this form and continues to knock in the goals I would have be more than happy if the club offered him a new contract. Although I have the feeling that he may be gone in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 i thought keegan said contract renewals weren't even being considered for the time being. That was for s*** players. I also thought Taylor was impressive against Fulham, hardly put a foot wrong, he's not the shit player some on here like to make out, he's young and a little too over eager on occassions but I truely believe if we let him go we'll regret it because I think he'll mature into a top centre half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 i thought keegan said contract renewals weren't even being considered for the time being. That was for s*** players. I also thought Taylor was impressive against Fulham, hardly put a foot wrong, he's not the shit player some on here like to make out, he's young and a little too over eager on occassions but I truely believe if we let him go we'll regret it because I think he'll mature into a top centre half. I think he's pap. His lap of honour and shirt donation after Saturdays game had me chewing my elbow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Exactly. But Sven is willing to throw silly money at players he wants. If he pays well we have loadsamoney. If he doesn't we still have Michael Owen He has a release cause that makes him available in the summer & it is meant to go down in value, so last year it was £9 million, this summer it is meant to be £6 million. Newcastle United chairman Chris Mort has revealed Michael Owen no longer has a buy-out clause in his contract. Owen joined United from Real Madrid for £17million in August 2005 but his career on Tyneside has been blighted by injury so far. There has been recent speculation about Owen's future but Magpies chairman Mort claims there is no chance he could leave for a low fee. He said: "There was a clause in Michael's contract which allowed him to leave for a certain fee during the last transfer window and the summer before that as well, but that sort of clause does not exist any longer." http://www.premierleague.com/page/Headlines/0,,12306~1145251,00.html The previous chairman said there was no release clauses when signed him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Wait and see, we won't get that much back off him anyway so lets see what he can do from now until the end of the season and at the beginning of next.. I agree. Keegan obviously wants to bounce the Board into a decision, but the reality is that none of the big four want him, and clubs outside the big four will have trouble in both matching his wages and convincing him to sign. Man City are keen. At least Sven is. Tell Sven its £23 million, not a penny less. If the swede still wants him, then let him go. With a year left on his contract, and less than 40 games played in 3 seasons, we'll be lucky to get £5M. With an extended contract and lots of goals next year, who knows? Exactly. But Sven is willing to throw silly money at players he wants. If he pays well we have loadsamoney. If he doesn't we still have Michael Owen He has a release cause that makes him available in the summer & it is meant to go down in value, so last year it was £9 million, this summer it is meant to be £6 million. Newcastle United chairman Chris Mort has revealed Michael Owen no longer has a buy-out clause in his contract. Owen joined United from Real Madrid for £17million in August 2005 but his career on Tyneside has been blighted by injury so far. There has been recent speculation about Owen's future but Magpies chairman Mort claims there is no chance he could leave for a low fee. He said: "There was a clause in Michael's contract which allowed him to leave for a certain fee during the last transfer window and the summer before that as well, but that sort of clause does not exist any longer." http://www.premierleague.com/page/Headlines/0,,12306~1145251,00.html The previous chairman said there was no release clauses when signed him. He said there was no clause that he could leave after one year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 i thought keegan said contract renewals weren't even being considered for the time being. That was for s*** players. I also thought Taylor was impressive against Fulham, hardly put a foot wrong, he's not the shit player some on here like to make out, he's young and a little too over eager on occassions but I truely believe if we let him go we'll regret it because I think he'll mature into a top centre half. I think he's pap. His lap of honour and shirt donation after Saturdays game had me chewing my elbow. what about the way he picks up the ball before one of OUR set pieces, walks five yards from the spot where its supposed to be taken, then throws it up in the air so the player taking it has to go out of his way to get it? like to be centre of attention much steven? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gray Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Think its time to get behind the lad to be honest, think he's answering some criticism. Would defo like to see his contract renewed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now