Ikon Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 YES YES YES YES Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Shit goal! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Best goal so far 2-0 hehe Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I've got 1-0 down for this, so I hope it turns back into a snoozefest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I've got 1-0 down for this, so I hope it turns back into a snoozefest. Aye, I was screaming when that ball was played in to the edge of the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I'd call that karma. They deserve to concede goals like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Wilhelmsson looks fucked. Kieron Dyer'd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Seb Larsson in now probably Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Fuck's sake. Third time so far this tournament, that i've walked out the room for half a minute, and someone's scored. Pissing hell! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Fuck's sake. Third time so far this tournament, that i've walked out the room for half a minute, and someone's scored. Pissing hell! You missed one of THE great Euro goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Seb Larsson in now probably Rosenberg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 f***'s sake. Third time so far this tournament, that i've walked out the room for half a minute, and someone's scored. Pissing hell! You missed one of THE great Euro goals. So good they're not allowed to replay it ever again. Shame Yorkie! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Seb Larsson in now probably Rosenberg Larsson must be shite, then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 the rules must say something about intention or circumstance, otherwise whenever a player rolls off the pitch injured, until the ball is kicked out of play, he'd be playing the opposition onside basically up to the goalkeeper, which would be farcical. the rules must say something about intention or circumstance, otherwise whenever a player rolls off the pitch injured, until the ball is kicked out of play, he'd be playing the opposition onside basically up to the goalkeeper, which would be farcical. If someone is injured the ref can stop play at any time. It would be farcical for the referee not to stop play. In the Premiership didn't we introduce a rule that means players must keep playing until if someone is injured until the ref blows his whistle nh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Fuck's sake. Third time so far this tournament, that i've walked out the room for half a minute, and someone's scored. Pissing hell! You missed one of THE great Euro goals. Was a belter wasn't it. Pleased that Sweden have fucked them. Pretty disgusting performance from the Greeks tbh. Smacked of smugness, arrogance, and deludedness tbh; who do they think they are? Fluked their way to the last one and were not going to do it again, and i hate managers like Rehhagel. Hope they finish bottom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Weird the way that no Greeks moved on that free kick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If there is no foul given what would be wrong with that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If he could shoulder charge him he wouldn't be offside anyway lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If there is no foul given what would be wrong with that? Well, the goal last night, for one. The defender didn't leave the pitch under his own volition, he was pushed off the pitch and his team was penalised for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If there is no foul given what would be wrong with that? Well, the goal last night, for one. The defender didn't leave the pitch under his own volition, he was pushed off the pitch and his team was penalised for it. Gianluigi was the one who pushed him.. had it been a Dutch player it would be a freekick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 Samaras should start next game for Greece. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 You should have put your money on two nil Keef [/beglin/Houghton] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I had to miss Holland vs Italy last night, but I saw the controversial goal last night and felt it should have stood and have no problem with the rules. Otherwise, when the ball is in the other half, three defenders could stand on the halfway line, while a sweeper could stand behind the goal line waiting to deal with any instances of the offside trap being broken. We know all that man, but equally, an attacker could shoulder charge a defender off the pitch and (assuming he's not penalised) ensure that there is no chance of being offside. If there is no foul given what would be wrong with that? Well, the goal last night, for one. The defender didn't leave the pitch under his own volition, he was pushed off the pitch and his team was penalised for it. In your example, if the defender was shoulder charged and through that an attacker would be onside if a pass was made what would be wrong with that, assuming the shoulder charge wasn't a foul? The same would happen if the incident happened and the defender stayed on the pitch, putting the attacker onside..? In yesterday evening´s event, it was an Italian player pushing an Italian player out of play. In any case, the rule is pretty clear if you ask me and there seems to be no debate between the people who know the rules.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now