ChezGiven Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 The 'Ashley is only in it for the money' theory falls down on two counts. Firstly, a man who's worth £1.9 billion doesn't need the money. Secondly, if despite that, he did want to make more money, he wouldn't buy a football club. (Particularly without checking out the level of debt first.) It's 1.4 billion now. Financial analysts are also compalining it is hard to unravel all his intertwined business stuff..... are you sure of sentence 1 bearing in mind sentence 2 ? You have me there. I liken financial analysts to the Miranda character out of The Devil Wears Prada, "This season i shall be mostly investing in crocs". Bunch of retarded cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 The 'Ashley is only in it for the money' theory falls down on two counts. Firstly, a man who's worth £1.9 billion doesn't need the money. Secondly, if despite that, he did want to make more money, he wouldn't buy a football club. (Particularly without checking out the level of debt first.) It's 1.4 billion now. Financial analysts are also compalining it is hard to unravel all his intertwined business stuff..... are you sure of sentence 1 bearing in mind sentence 2 ? You have me there. I liken financial analysts to the Miranda character out of The Devil Wears Prada, "This season i shall be mostly investing in crocs". Bunch of retarded cunts. Cocktail drinking nancy boys to the last. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 The 'Ashley is only in it for the money' theory falls down on two counts. Firstly, a man who's worth £1.9 billion doesn't need the money. Secondly, if despite that, he did want to make more money, he wouldn't buy a football club. (Particularly without checking out the level of debt first.) It's 1.4 billion now. Financial analysts are also compalining it is hard to unravel all his intertwined business stuff..... are you sure of sentence 1 bearing in mind sentence 2 ? You have me there. I liken financial analysts to the Miranda character out of The Devil Wears Prada, "This season i shall be mostly investing in crocs". Bunch of retarded cunts. Cocktail drinking nancy boys to the last. Sheep the lot of them, just like half the Ashley haters who are scared to come over as politically incorrect (in the geordie sense of course). Baaaa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 The anti-KK propaganda has started: http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10278~1390473,00.html 5. In the 19 league matches played under Keegan, 21 points were accrued, the joint fewest by any current Premier League team over that same period of just under eight months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 The anti-KK propaganda has started: http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10278~1390473,00.html 5. In the 19 league matches played under Keegan, 21 points were accrued, the joint fewest by any current Premier League team over that same period of just under eight months. To be fair, they just lifted most of that from the BBC, the lazy buggers. Anyway, its not anit keegan its FACT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnonel Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 weird. only 36% of this board hold Ashley responsible. protest. boycott. sack the owner. hmmmmmm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 weird. only 36% of this board hold Ashley responsible. protest. boycott. sack the owner. hmmmmmm 18% say all of the above, so adding that 54% blame him. 98.8% blame Ashley or someone he appointed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 The 'Ashley is only in it for the money' theory falls down on two counts. Firstly, a man who's worth £1.9 billion doesn't need the money. Secondly, if despite that, he did want to make more money, he wouldn't buy a football club. (Particularly without checking out the level of debt first.) It's 1.4 billion now. Financial analysts are also compalining it is hard to unravel all his intertwined business stuff..... are you sure of sentence 1 bearing in mind sentence 2 ? You have me there. I liken financial analysts to the Miranda character out of The Devil Wears Prada, "This season i shall be mostly investing in crocs". Bunch of retarded cunts. to be fair you cant lose money investing in crocs, charging 30 quid for a bit of rubber designed by a 5 year old, its a fucking goldmine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edd Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 weird. only 36% of this board hold Ashley responsible. protest. boycott. sack the owner. hmmmmmm 18% say all of the above, so adding that 54% blame him. 98.8% blame Ashley or someone he appointed Just short of 30% hold Keegan wholly or partly responsible which, given his legendary status up here, is surprisingly high. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 SSN breaking news - Keegan currently meeting Ashley in London. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 i know it'll almost definately be about compensation, but i'm still a little excited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now