Guest guinness_fiend Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. He's a full blooded player and a mouthy get but he doesn't dive or play act. That's just bullshit tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. Your joking, right ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. He's a full blooded player and a mouthy get but he doesn't dive or play act. That's just bullshit tbh. watch how far he throws himself when challanged from behind for a header.(any slightest touch from behind for that matter) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. Aint it obvious,black donkeys have larger appendages than the white ones.It aint University Challenge you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. why does the pig have to be pink ffs ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. why does the pig have to be pink ffs ? Indeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. why does the pig have to be pink ffs ? Cos pink piggies are more gay than the black ones of course Mads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. why does the pig have to be pink ffs ? Cos pink piggies are more gay than the black ones of course Mads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 delighted he did get sent off because he cant play aginst us. cant stand the bloke, and hate his celebration more, but he is a very handy player who does well against us. he's the kind of t*** who you would love in your team. (unlike savage, who was just an absoloute weapon) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. Hmmm... your point ? Why does it have to be black? It seemed a bit odd, tis all. why does the pig have to be pink ffs ? Cos pink piggies are more gay than the black ones of course Mads. bloody stereotyper Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 delighted he did get sent off because he cant play aginst us. cant stand the bloke, and hate his celebration more, but he is a very handy player who does well against us. he's the kind of t*** who you would love in your team. (unlike savage, who was just an absoloute weapon) I'd agree with this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I fucking hate Cahill more than any other player so it's all fair in my mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Not a direct comment on Cahill (didn't see it), but I think all appeals should be based on a "Double or Nothing" approach. If you're banned for 3 game, and you want to appeal then you would risk loosing the appeal and sitting for six. It's too easy and an automatic reaction to appeal every red card. Go on a Double or Nothing approach, and you might not see so many appeals. Got to be a waste of the FA time. Would Cahill or Terry have risked sitting for 6 games, or would they just take their three game ban and get on with it. Obviously if the card was frivalous then the appeal would be worth it, but if not then perhaps the risk would be too great and they would stay away from possible red cards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Apologies as this is a bit off topic, but I'm interested in people's thoughts on the Cahill dismissal at the weekend, and the subsequent failed appeal. Do you think it's double standards, as we're not in the Sky 4? (Referring to Terry's successful appeal for a similar offence). Do you think it was just crap refereeing? Or do you think Riley got it spot on? Personally I think it was Tim's reaction to it and him not going to the ref straight away that ultimately did the damage, but you can't help but feel the sweet FA once again are trying out their punishments on anyone other than the top 4 (e.g. the Moyes charge, what a joke). Not sure you have many sympathisers on here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Not a direct comment on Cahill (didn't see it), but I think all appeals should be based on a "Double or Nothing" approach. If you're banned for 3 game, and you want to appeal then you would risk loosing the appeal and sitting for six. It's too easy and an automatic reaction to appeal every red car. Go on a Double or Nothing approach, and you might not see so many appeals. Got to be a waste of the FA time. Would Cahill or Terry have risked sitting for 6 games, or would they just take their three game ban and get on with it. Obviously if the card was frivalous then the appeal would be worth it, but if not then perhaps the risk would be too great and they would stay away from possible red cards. i like that idea but would alter it slightly. instead of doubling the ban make it ,say....................a revolver with 1 bullet......you following where i'm going with this ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Not a direct comment on Cahill (didn't see it), but I think all appeals should be based on a "Double or Nothing" approach. If you're banned for 3 game, and you want to appeal then you would risk loosing the appeal and sitting for six. It's too easy and an automatic reaction to appeal every red car. Go on a Double or Nothing approach, and you might not see so many appeals. Got to be a waste of the FA time. Would Cahill or Terry have risked sitting for 6 games, or would they just take their three game ban and get on with it. Obviously if the card was frivalous then the appeal would be worth it, but if not then perhaps the risk would be too great and they would stay away from possible red cards. i like that idea but would alter it slightly. instead of doubling the ban make it ,say....................a revolver with 1 bullet......you following where i'm going with this ? Surely that would only work if Pavulechenko got sent off? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Apologies as this is a bit off topic, but I'm interested in people's thoughts on the Cahill dismissal at the weekend, and the subsequent failed appeal. Do you think it's double standards, as we're not in the Sky 4? (Referring to Terry's successful appeal for a similar offence). Do you think it was just crap refereeing? Or do you think Riley got it spot on? Personally I think it was Tim's reaction to it and him not going to the ref straight away that ultimately did the damage, but you can't help but feel the sweet FA once again are trying out their punishments on anyone other than the top 4 (e.g. the Moyes charge, what a joke). Not sure you have many sympathisers on here Not particularly defending Cahill's petulance, more highlighting the incompetence of the refereeing that he gave a red card for the tackle. And I can't see how Terry's role as England captain didn't influence the decision of this pathetic organisation that's supposed to be running football in this country. This so-called era of respect is a farse at the moment, respect first and foremost has to be earned, and that means referees sharpening up their game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ryunufc Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 A yellow for the tackle and another one for dissent, instead of a straight red. I think he got carried away after Arbeloa's tackle 5 mins earlier that should have been a straight red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Most of the time that would have been called a yellow, but it was a bad tackle so he can't complain. The media seem to spend too much time bothering about the finer points of decisions - the worst culprit being Andy Gray, who seems to think it's his job to mark the referee's card each time the whistle blows. Unless a decision is clearly wrong, the ref's verdict should stand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 My only thought, was THANK FUCK FOR THAT. He misses the game against us so thats great news.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 got what he deserved for years of leaving studs in,elbowing when in for hearders then squealing like a little pink piggy with a black donkeys dick up its arse when anyone so much as looks at him. He's a full blooded player and a mouthy get but he doesn't dive or play act. That's just bullshit tbh. I seem to remember him going down holding his face when Shola pushed him in the upper chest/neck area a few seasons back to get him sent off. Fully agree with Lovejoy's description of him though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted October 1, 2008 Share Posted October 1, 2008 Didnt Babayaro lamp him once? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now