bowlingcrofty Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. But no matter what the judgement says he still just gave up and walked out. if keegan has these concern's in july, why didn't he walk out then etc How could he have concerns about signing Nacho in July when he didn't sign till September ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. But no matter what the judgement says he still just gave up and walked out. if keegan has these concern's in july, why didn't he walk out then etc How could he have concerns about signing Nacho in July when he didn't sign till September ffs well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. But no matter what the judgement says he still just gave up and walked out. if keegan has these concern's in july, why didn't he walk out then etc He didnt walk out in September he was constructively dismissed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 5.2 The Club admitted to the Tribunal that it repeatedly and intentionally misled the press, public and the fans of Newcastle United. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. But no matter what the judgement says he still just gave up and walked out. if keegan has these concern's in july, why didn't he walk out then etc How could he have concerns about signing Nacho in July when he didn't sign till September ffs well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Well OK, let's assume KK has concerns in July. The transfer window doesn't close until September. Does he walk away then, or does he, maybe naively, wait until the window closes and sees how it pans out? How ANYONE can still think KK is in the wrong after reading the results in the PDF is utterly, utterly beyond me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Sounds almost too petty and ridiculous doesn't it, hmmm... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. not totally, as keegan would of got his 9m if he did If you read the whole judgement, it's clear the size of his pay-out was dictated by the smallest of small print in his contract and so is more or less irrelevant next to the fact that his complaint was upheld and the club have been ridiculed by the arbitration panel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Sounds almost too petty and ridiculous doesn't it, hmmm... Read the pdf, man. There's no way someone can read that and still blame KK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Sounds almost too petty and ridiculous doesn't it, hmmm... Read the pdf, man. There's no way someone can read that and still blame KK. Precisely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilky Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 That is as damning a verdict as you can get on Ashley and the way in which he runs the club. In fact the words used are as damning as you can get from a legal point of view. Questioning the clubs witnesses, the club having to change the definition of the word 'manager' throughout the proceedings. Keegan completely vindicated Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hope this finally shuts up the Keegan bashers Why? This is exactly the kind of expected verdict on Ashley and co's actions. Why? Er, because the judgement completely vindicates Keegan. not totally, as keegan would of got his 9m if he did If you read the whole judgement, it's clear the size of his pay-out was dictated by the smallest of small print in his contract and so is more or less irrelevant next to the fact that his complaint was upheld and the club have been ridiculed by the arbitration panel. I agree, for those that have not read the pdf (and for what its worth, I found it very easy to read, and not at all in 'lawyer speak') it seems clear to me that the tribunal found fully in Keegans favour, but that his contract had the small print indicating that if it ended, any compensation was limited to £2m. So basically they awarded him the maximum possible. Having read through it one thing is certain to me. It is now imperative that Ashley, Llambias and their like are all out of the club for good as soon as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Mongo Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Sounds almost too petty and ridiculous doesn't it, hmmm... Then again, the PDF says it's not only about that one player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 It has been agreed that we will determine the question of costs once the parties have been notified of our award and have had an opportunity to make written submissions about costs to us. We will also determine the questions whether there should be a discount for early receipt and/or any deduction for earnings received since Mr Keegan’s constructive dismissal once we have received written submissions on these issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 This is the best result possible for everyone. Keegan is vindicated, the club isn't cleaned out and the sale to Barry Moat should now go through assuming Ashley doesn't pull another rabbit from the hat. I'm really pleased with it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised Sounds almost too petty and ridiculous doesn't it, hmmm... Then again, the PDF says it's not only about that one player. if it wasn't then fine, what about xisco? & jonas, remember keegan actually showed xisco around st james' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Why has Keegan waited until now to write this PDF? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Ha ha ha what abunch of cunts ashley and his merry band of wankers are. COme on the Keegans haters lets have you out then, come on get on with it! Knackers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 read it in full.. ashley and co fucked up big style, but i still believe keegan acted petulantly and typically keeganesque... fgs they signed him on loan, he didnt have to play him! his press release is trying to justify it all to the fans too. we should never have gave him the job in the 1st place nowhere does it go on about any of the schweinsteiger rumour or any other player being part of the whole thing i agree he deserved the tribunal win as they never said he wouldnt have final say on transfers, however i believe this could have all been avoided his needs to be proven right far exceed those of his self declared love for the club the man is stubborn and pig headed, just like his nemesis.. mr ashley (both in the wrong imo) fgs the man was trying to claim for 'stigma' damages.. wtf is that?? he has had that stigma of walking out long before he was re signed for us i am glad it was only £2m as hopefully this will finally get the sale of the club moving.. ashley cannot stay after the report shows him to be a liar and a c0ck, but no way on this planet would i ever have keegan back at this club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Anybody who continues this anti keegan stance has absolutely no credibilty left whatsoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Why has Keegan waited until now to write this PDF? I take that back it's 23 pages, would have taken him ages to write it as he probably quit a few times along the way due to word using the wrong font without telling him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Anybody who continues this anti keegan stance has absolutely no credibilty left whatsoever. Wonder what their motive is tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Unbeleivable, really is. What a bunch of clowns we have running the club... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 well if this whole thing is about the transfer of 1 player, then i'm very suprised If you read the thing once it is what will you think the key bit being 6. Although we heard a considerable amount of evidence as to events which took place in the months which followed Mr Keegan’s appointment, in view of our conclusions, we can proceed at once to the events which culminated in Mr Keegan’s resignation on 4 September 2008. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Anybody who continues this anti keegan stance has absolutely no credibilty left whatsoever. Wonder what their motive is tbh my problem with keegan, is that he's a quitter, walked out on us last time, and left england right up the shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Anybody who continues this anti keegan stance has absolutely no credibilty left whatsoever. Wonder what their motive is tbh my problem with keegan, is that he's a quitter, walked out on us last time, and left england right up the shit like i said, you have no credibilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts