Skirge Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 He did well again at RB supports play well to and has the heart to get back into position.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The quicker Beye is back the better, Taylor was the weakest link in our defence today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The quicker Beye is back the better, Taylor was the weakest link in our defence today. Load of fuking shit. Blatantly Colo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Load of fuking s***. Blatantly Colo. I wouldn't say that he was a "load of fukin shit" but he was the weakest link, again too much standing and pointing when he should have been helping out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Come on. Taylor is not the new Cafu, its blatent that he is just Kak(a). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I wouldnt say Tayls is the new Cafu now, but yes, he played very well there today and was confident going forward. As someone said though, he must learn to cross a ball first. If he manages to do that then he'll be quality! Howay young Taylor! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Load of fuking s***. Blatantly Colo. I wouldn't say that he was a "load of fukin shit" but he was the weakest link, again too much standing and pointing when he should have been helping out. Colo was better? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 A good game today, he actually does have the physical ability to play RB, wouldn't mind seeing him given a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Colo was better? Like I said, he spends too much time pointing for others to do something, at one time he was nowhere to be seen and we had nobody defending at rightback, it was late on in the second half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Colo was better? Like I said, he spends too much time pointing for others to do something, at one time he was nowhere to be seen and we had nobody defending at rightback, it was late on in the second half. So Colo was better? I'm not NE5 mate, im asking you a question, stop avoiding it thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 So Colo was better? I'm not NE5 mate, im asking you a question, stop avoiding it thanks. I thought that he was better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 So Colo was better? I'm not NE5 mate, im asking you a question, stop avoiding it thanks. I thought that he was better. I really think you know what follows here: mackems.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I really think you know what follows here: mackems.gif I didn't have the benefit of replays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I really think you know what follows here: mackems.gif I didn't have the benefit of replays. Nor the benefit of much else it seems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 For me, when we get Raylor in, we should play a back four of: --Raylor----Staylor--Bassong---Enrique---- For a few games. I think Colo needs to be dropped/given a rest, because his confidence is shot to pieces. Plus he's played pretty much every game this season for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Just seen the penalty. Good. I'd rather score against them with a dodgy penalty than a real one, it'll annoy them more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 For me, when we get Raylor in, we should play a back four of: --Raylor----Staylor--Bassong---Enrique---- For a few games. I think Colo needs to be dropped/given a rest, because his confidence is shot to pieces. Plus he's played pretty much every game this season for us. It's not a confidence issue for Colo. Mentally I think he's as solid as a rock. More of a "still getting used to playing in a different league" issue. And Saylor should never, ever play in central defense again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewellander Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Saylor definitely had a good game at RB and should start there again against WBA. Raylor should probably start on the bench, tbh, but it will be good to have a player like him on the bench who can cover in a few positions when our players get the inevitable injuries. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Was very good going forward but still looked incredibly dodgy at the back. Could of given away a penalty, fell over a couple of times and mis-cued a couple of clearances. No major mistakes but he came close on a couple of occasions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Was very good going forward but still looked incredibly dodgy at the back. Could of given away a penalty, fell over a couple of times and mis-cued a couple of clearances. No major mistakes but he came close on a couple of occasions. That's my reading of Coloccini today tbh, plus costing us a goal obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Nor the benefit of much else it seems. Like I said, I didn't have the benefit of replays and couldn't see what was really going on in the first half as it was the other end of the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Was very good going forward but still looked incredibly dodgy at the back. Could of given away a penalty, fell over a couple of times and mis-cued a couple of clearances. No major mistakes but he came close on a couple of occasions. That's my reading of Coloccini today tbh, plus costing us a goal obviously. Aye Colo looked like a nervous wreck today, no confidence at all. Taylor was just as suspect but looked very assured going forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I'd like to see him given a chance as a DM to be honest. He's got a lot more physical presence than Butt, is far more mobile than Butt, likes to get forward a bit, is strong arially in an offensive capacity, and any clangers he dropped in midfield would be less likely to result in a goal against us or a conceded penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NobbyOhNobby Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I'd like to see him given a chance as a DM to be honest. He's got a lot more physical presence than Butt, is far more mobile than Butt, likes to get forward a bit, is strong arially in an offensive capacity, and any clangers he dropped in midfield would be less likely to result in a goal against us or a conceded penalty. can't see it to be honest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I'd like to see him given a chance as a DM to be honest. He's got a lot more physical presence than Butt, is far more mobile than Butt, likes to get forward a bit, is strong arially in an offensive capacity, and any clangers he dropped in midfield would be less likely to result in a goal against us or a conceded penalty. can't see it to be honest Oh right......... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now