Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Something would have to be done and it will have to be done quite soon, I doub't anybody will want another West Ham situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 They'll just be fined I'd be amazed if that did happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA special Rule 101. Northern Club,....Fuck em over. London Club,...With 'Arry....ignore misdemeanours Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 'Arry will be at home like :harry: :harry: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BigTrev Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 They'll just be fined I'd be amazed if that did happen. thats the most that will happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slippery Sam Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Nowt will happen. It's Spurs. Is the correct answer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Sorry to spoil this thread but it's a non starter. Palacios was banned for 2 games which were United and Stoke. Again i apologise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The suggestion is that if Palacios was still a Wigan player, his ban would have finished on 31st January, but because he moved to White Hart Lane, the ban should see him cup tied for Carling Cup and FA Cup games, meaning his ban should be carried over these games. Therefore, his fixture list should read: Wednesday Jan 21 2009 Burnley CC (A) (cup tied) Saturday Jan 24 2009 Manchester United FA (A) (cup tied) Tuesday Jan 27 2009 Stoke City (H) (suspended) Saturday Jan 31 2009 Bolton Wanderers (A) (suspended) Sunday Feb 08 2009 Arsenal (H) (ban lifted) Not sure I get this bit? Why would it be lifted later when he's at the Spuds? Did Wigan play more games in that period then Spuds? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Kick them out of the League Cup Nothing will happen though, we're talking about Spurs. They'll just say "look, we lost the game anyway, it's not like we picked up any points". I doubt the FA will even take any action, even if it is to investigate it. They fucked up so spectacularly with West Ham that if they dock Spurs points then it'll show that they should have done the same to West Ham and they'll end up in court for the next 3 years defending every decision. On the other side, if they investigate and do nothing, or almost nothing, a la West Ham any team that gets relegated will end up in court against the FA for their failure to dock them points. It's lose-lose for the FA, so they'll sit on their hands & ignore the problem until it goes away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slippery Sam Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Apology accepted. Now do one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Nowt will happen. It's Spurs. Is the correct answer. Nowt will happen because its crap from a bullshit website. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Sorry to spoil this thread but it's a non starter. Palacios was banned for 2 games which were United and Stoke. Again i apologise. Apology not accepted and Spurs will still go down, and 'Arry will do a runner 5 games before the season ends. Much as I hate the senile cunt, I hope he carries on his surrender monkey act with you lot. love you kd like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Sorry to spoil this thread but it's a non starter. Palacios was banned for 2 games which were United and Stoke. Again i apologise. The suggestion is though, that he was cup-tied for that, so it should carry over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The suggestion is that if Palacios was still a Wigan player, his ban would have finished on 31st January, but because he moved to White Hart Lane, the ban should see him cup tied for Carling Cup and FA Cup games, meaning his ban should be carried over these games. Therefore, his fixture list should read: Wednesday Jan 21 2009 Burnley CC (A) (cup tied) Saturday Jan 24 2009 Manchester United FA (A) (cup tied) Tuesday Jan 27 2009 Stoke City (H) (suspended) Saturday Jan 31 2009 Bolton Wanderers (A) (suspended) Sunday Feb 08 2009 Arsenal (H) (ban lifted) Not sure I get this bit? Why would it be lifted later when he's at the Spuds? Did Wigan play more games in that period then Spuds? I think the point is he was cup tied for Man Utd FA Cup game, so that match shouldn't have counted as one of his suspension matches - not sure if that matters or not though. (As Optimistic Nut said just before me) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Sorry to spoil this thread but it's a non starter. Palacios was banned for 2 games which were United and Stoke. Again i apologise. btw, how the fuck was he allowed to be banned for a game he was cup-tied for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Kick them out of the League Cup They'll just say "look, we lost the game anyway, it's not like we picked up any points". Makes no difference what so ever, they'll get done if its true, simple as that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Kick them out of the League Cup They'll just say "look, we lost the game anyway, it's not like we picked up any points". Makes no difference what so ever, they'll get done if its true, simple as that. Would kick start our season tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 The suggestion is that if Palacios was still a Wigan player, his ban would have finished on 31st January, but because he moved to White Hart Lane, the ban should see him cup tied for Carling Cup and FA Cup games, meaning his ban should be carried over these games. Therefore, his fixture list should read: Wednesday Jan 21 2009 Burnley CC (A) (cup tied) Saturday Jan 24 2009 Manchester United FA (A) (cup tied) Tuesday Jan 27 2009 Stoke City (H) (suspended) Saturday Jan 31 2009 Bolton Wanderers (A) (suspended) Sunday Feb 08 2009 Arsenal (H) (ban lifted) Not sure I get this bit? Why would it be lifted later when he's at the Spuds? Did Wigan play more games in that period then Spuds? I think the point is he was cup tied for Man Utd FA Cup game, so that match shouldn't have counted as one of his suspension matches - not sure if that matters or not though. (As Optimistic Nut said just before me) Ah right, well it comes down to whether there's a rule for that and what it says, nobody knows so in that case the FA probably will just say its ok so they don't have to punish the Spuds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Sorry to spoil this thread but it's a non starter. Palacios was banned for 2 games which were United and Stoke. Again i apologise. btw, how the f*** was he allowed to be banned for a game he was cup-tied for? PLAYERS SENT OFF UNDER LAW 12 (7) A Player who is dismissed from the Field of Play for receiving a second caution in the same match will be suspended automatically from FTCM commencing forthwith, until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed its next FTCM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA rules: Any period of suspension arising from recording cautions will commence on the seventh day following the date of his last offence. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition. Nothing to see here people,Orderly line back to the Given thread please, queue jumping will not be appreciated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA rules: Any period of suspension arising from recording cautions will commence on the seventh day following the date of his last offence. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition. Nothing to see here people,Orderly line back to the Given thread please, queue jumping will not be appreciated. Does this bit mean the cup ties? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA rules: Any period of suspension arising from recording cautions will commence on the seventh day following the date of his last offence. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition. Nothing to see here people,Orderly line back to the Given thread please, queue jumping will not be appreciated. Surely if he is cup tied though that doesn't count as being suspended for the game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA rules: Any period of suspension arising from recording cautions will commence on the seventh day following the date of his last offence. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition. Nothing to see here people,Orderly line back to the Given thread please, queue jumping will not be appreciated. Surely if he is cup tied though that doesn't count as being suspended for the game? That's what you'd think would make sense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Surely if he is cup tied though that doesn't count as being suspended for the game? If he was cup tied then it can't count. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 FA rules: Any period of suspension arising from recording cautions will commence on the seventh day following the date of his last offence. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition. Nothing to see here people,Orderly line back to the Given thread please, queue jumping will not be appreciated. Surely if he is cup tied though that doesn't count as being suspended for the game? The cup tie counts as one of his suspensions, even though he was cup tied. Stupid FA rule which they'll probably change next year but he was ok to play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now