Llambias Q&A with Chronicle: OP updated with Thursday's articles

[relámpago blanco]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

Would you be happy if Shepherd bought the club back?

 

do you mean the Halls and Shepherd ?

 

 

I don't think SJH would, so say Douglas Hall and The Shepherds.

 

Don't think Douglas Hall would I think it's Shepherds and other people.

Of course DH would, piss about on drunken trips whilst getting 1m per year salary?

 

eeerr........and the relevance, if the team is playing regularly in europe, filling the stadium, and signing good footballers, is what exactly ?

 

 

That wasn't a retort to you, was just a joke, are you going to answer my question?

[madras]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

[OzzieMandias]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

Would you be happy if Shepherd bought the club back?

 

do you mean the Halls and Shepherd ?

 

 

I don't think SJH would, so say Douglas Hall and The Shepherds.

 

Don't think Douglas Hall would I think it's Shepherds and other people.

Of course DH would, piss about on drunken trips whilst getting 1m per year salary?

 

eeerr........and the relevance, if the team is playing regularly in europe, filling the stadium, and signing good footballers, is what exactly ?

 

 

That wasn't a retort to you, was just a joke, are you going to answer my question?

 

what, a choice between Ashley v Halls and Shepherd ? No brainer, when Ashley takes us down you will have your answer.

 

 

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

 

so what exactly is your criteria for appointing managers, what do you think of appointing a manager who had won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? Thats at least 4 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, isn't it Ozzie ? C'mon, don't be shy  mackems.gif

 

See my sig ? Do you still stand by the fact that by virtue of that comment, you think Ashley will get us back into the Champions league  mackems.gif

[jimmymag]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

Would you be happy if Shepherd bought the club back?

 

do you mean the Halls and Shepherd ?

 

 

I don't think SJH would, so say Douglas Hall and The Shepherds.

 

Don't think Douglas Hall would I think it's Shepherds and other people.

Of course DH would, piss about on drunken trips whilst getting 1m per year salary?

 

eeerr........and the relevance, if the team is playing regularly in europe, filling the stadium, and signing good footballers, is what exactly ?

 

 

That wasn't a retort to you, was just a joke, are you going to answer my question?

 

what, a choice between Ashley v Halls and Shepherd ? No brainer, when Ashley takes us down you will have your answer.

 

 

 

I'm starting to think you'd like that just to prove your point. Pathetic really.

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

Would you be happy if Shepherd bought the club back?

 

do you mean the Halls and Shepherd ?

 

 

I don't think SJH would, so say Douglas Hall and The Shepherds.

 

Don't think Douglas Hall would I think it's Shepherds and other people.

Of course DH would, piss about on drunken trips whilst getting 1m per year salary?

 

eeerr........and the relevance, if the team is playing regularly in europe, filling the stadium, and signing good footballers, is what exactly ?

 

 

That wasn't a retort to you, was just a joke, are you going to answer my question?

 

what, a choice between Ashley v Halls and Shepherd ? No brainer, when Ashley takes us down you will have your answer.

 

 

 

I'm starting to think you'd like that just to prove your point. Pathetic really.

 

such comments are the most pathetic I've ever seen. Have YOU seen real mediocrity ?

 

 

[OzzieMandias]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

 

so what exactly is your criteria for appointing managers, what do you think of appointing a manager who had won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? Thats at least 4 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, isn't it Ozzie ? C'mon, don't be shy  mackems.gif

 

See my sig ? Do you still stand by the fact that by virtue of that comment, you think Ashley will get us back into the Champions league  mackems.gif

 

Thanks for demonstrating my point.

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

 

so what exactly is your criteria for appointing managers, what do you think of appointing a manager who had won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? Thats at least 4 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, isn't it Ozzie ? C'mon, don't be shy  mackems.gif

 

See my sig ? Do you still stand by the fact that by virtue of that comment, you think Ashley will get us back into the Champions league  mackems.gif

 

Thanks for demonstrating my point.

 

what point ? You mean you think Ashley will "make a better fist of it than the present board" and get us back into the Champions League - by appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards, for example  mackems.gif

[OzzieMandias]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

 

so what exactly is your criteria for appointing managers, what do you think of appointing a manager who had won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? Thats at least 4 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, isn't it Ozzie ? C'mon, don't be shy  mackems.gif

 

See my sig ? Do you still stand by the fact that by virtue of that comment, you think Ashley will get us back into the Champions league  mackems.gif

 

Thanks for demonstrating my point.

 

what point ? You mean you think Ashley will "make a better fist of it than the present board" and get us back into the Champions League - by appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards, for example  mackems.gif

 

The avoiding questions you're too chickenshit to answer by gibbering inane tripe point.

 

Obviously.

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

i wonder if anyone else on here thinks that is an answer to the question i asked ?

 

He's answered it every bit as completely as he has answered my question, "Do you honestly think Shepherd would have got us back into the Champions League."

 

That is to say, every time he hears it he runs and hides under the bedclothes, gibbering some inane tripe about manager of the year awards.

 

so what exactly is your criteria for appointing managers, what do you think of appointing a manager who had won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? Thats at least 4 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, isn't it Ozzie ? C'mon, don't be shy  mackems.gif

 

See my sig ? Do you still stand by the fact that by virtue of that comment, you think Ashley will get us back into the Champions league  mackems.gif

 

Thanks for demonstrating my point.

 

what point ? You mean you think Ashley will "make a better fist of it than the present board" and get us back into the Champions League - by appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards, for example  mackems.gif

 

The avoiding questions you're too chickenshit to answer by gibbering inane tripe point.

 

did you think Gullit would succeed too Ozzie, that would make it 5 out of 6 that you agreed with  mackems.gif

[OzzieMandias]

For the hundredth time, if you want me to answer your questions, all you have to do is first answer this one:

 

Do you honestly think Shepherd was going to get us back into the Champions League.

 

As you know this, and won't answer my question, you obviously have no real interest in getting an answer to yours. So keep on repeating it, chum, and don't act surprised when people think you're a mong.

[NE5]

For the hundredth time, if you want me to answer your questions, all you have to do is first answer this one:

 

Do you honestly think Shepherd was going to get us back into the Champions League.

 

As you know this, and won't answer my question, you obviously have no real interest in getting an answer to yours. So keep on repeating it, chum, and don't act surprised when people think you're a mong.

 

I've answered you, pal. And your unique gift of hindsight doesn't impress me one little bit.

 

Is this 5 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, or do you think that Kinnear will get us back into the Champions League and fulfill the prediction you made which I quote in my sig ?

 

Have you decided yet if you agree with protests or don't agree with protests too  mackems.gif

 

 

[Syrette]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v146/deadreflection/stolen%20smilie%20folder/rolleyesbarf.gif

 

Just answer the questions already.

[NE5]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v146/deadreflection/stolen%20smilie%20folder/rolleyesbarf.gif

 

Just answer the questions already.

 

do you mean mandiarse ?

 

Shame eh, he likes to dish out the one liners and insults, but can't take it in return without whinging.

 

I've answered him. Aren't you curious to know what he thinks of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards ? It would seem good enough to me, all he has to say is yes or no and why he thinks such a manager is under qualified if thats the case. Do YOU think it is under qualified ?

 

Thats my opinion anyway. Not too many clubs can appoint someone with a CV like that, wouldn't you agree ? Mike Ashley can't.

 

 

[OzzieMandias]

For the hundredth time, if you want me to answer your questions, all you have to do is first answer this one:

 

Do you honestly think Shepherd was going to get us back into the Champions League.

 

As you know this, and won't answer my question, you obviously have no real interest in getting an answer to yours. So keep on repeating it, chum, and don't act surprised when people think you're a mong.

 

I've answered you, pal. And your unique gift of hindsight doesn't impress me one little bit.

 

Is this 5 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, or do you think that Kinnear will get us back into the Champions League and fulfill the prediction you made which I quote in my sig ?

 

Have you decided yet if you agree with protests or don't agree with protests too  mackems.gif

 

 

 

Liar.

[NE5]

For the hundredth time, if you want me to answer your questions, all you have to do is first answer this one:

 

Do you honestly think Shepherd was going to get us back into the Champions League.

 

As you know this, and won't answer my question, you obviously have no real interest in getting an answer to yours. So keep on repeating it, chum, and don't act surprised when people think you're a mong.

 

I've answered you, pal. And your unique gift of hindsight doesn't impress me one little bit.

 

Is this 5 out of 6 managerial appointments you agreed with, or do you think that Kinnear will get us back into the Champions League and fulfill the prediction you made which I quote in my sig ?

 

Have you decided yet if you agree with protests or don't agree with protests too  mackems.gif

 

 

 

Liar.

 

I'm afraid I have. Whattsa matter anyway, don't you stand by your prophecy which is quoted in my sig 

[Dr Venkman]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

 

err, no it isnt.

 

yes it is. It led to near bankruptcy and one foot in the 3rd division.

 

 

 

 

no it isnt, the worst case scenario is that we're in so much financial trouble that the club folds. could anything worse happen to a football club? infact i'll answer for you, no, nothing could be worse than that.

[thomas]

ETA on that ignore function, dave?

[OzzieMandias]

If you're not telling a brazen lie, it would be easy to prove me wrong by linking to your "answer".

 

But you can't, because you haven't answered it.

 

Honest, it's like dealing with a five-year-old.

[NE5]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

 

err, no it isnt.

 

yes it is. It led to near bankruptcy and one foot in the 3rd division.

 

 

 

 

no it isnt, the worst case scenario is that we're in so much financial trouble that the club folds. could anything worse happen to a football club? infact i'll answer for you, no, nothing could be worse than that.

 

eeerr..........if not for the Halls and Shepherd, we would have folded as a 3rd division club in 1991.

 

 

[NE5]

If you're not telling a brazen lie, it would be easy to prove me wrong by linking to your "answer".

 

But you can't, because you haven't answered it.

 

Honest, it's like dealing with a five-year-old.

 

For the last time. If you back your managers and have a big fanbase like we do, then you can qualify for the Champions League, they had proved they knew how to do it.

 

So. In accordance with your prediction which is in my sig, do you think Ashley will do better or even match them, and do you think that an unbacked Joe Kinnear is more qualified to do it than a backed manager who has won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards.

 

A 4 year old could answer this.

 

 

[Dr Venkman]

Clearly the old board were only responsible for things when they turned out well.

 

For those occasions when they turned out badly, blame magically disappears into fractions and percentages.

 

so what do you think of the merits of appointing a manager who won 4 titles with 2 different clubs and 3 manager of the year awards - before they do well or not so well, with your own unique gift of hindsight  ?

You're still fully behind Mike Ashley and his amazing success I take it ?

 

 

 

 

Are we still on this question?

 

he's a bit shy with the answer, the truth being that nobody in their right mind would consider such an appointment to be a poor one, but he might surprise us if he replies.

 

 

it's not the only question on here that goes unanswered though is it ?

 

do you keep on borrowing while making a loss and debts mounting until you are succesful or bankrupt whichever comes first ?

 

 

 

he's a bit shy with the answer. the truth being he knows you can't borrow indefinitly but to say so would break his argument. so instead he'll reply (not answer) that you won't compete without spending (whilst neglecting to say where the money will come from,maybe throwing in a reference to other clubs in debt of which none are actually in our position)

 

I've answered you. You don't know if the next player will be the one that gives you great value, you don't deliberately buy a player that doesn't give good value, and re the question that mandiarse refuses to answer because he KNOWS he has agreed with at least 4 of those 6 appointments, is that you don't deliberately appoint managers who you think will fail either.

 

The worst scenario is the one that Ashley is taking which is not to take the risks to compete, so stand by for a dose of REAL mediocrity, far worse than what you previously thought it was.

 

 

 

err, no it isnt.

 

yes it is. It led to near bankruptcy and one foot in the 3rd division.

 

 

 

 

no it isnt, the worst case scenario is that we're in so much financial trouble that the club folds. could anything worse happen to a football club? infact i'll answer for you, no, nothing could be worse than that.

 

eeerr..........if not for the Halls and Shepherd, we would have folded as a 3rd division club in 1991.

 

 

 

errr, my point still stands, take your board vs board blinkers off

[dcmk]

If you're not telling a brazen lie, it would be easy to prove me wrong by linking to your "answer".

 

But you can't, because you haven't answered it.

 

Honest, it's like dealing with a five-year-old.

 

..and yet you do the same and not answer his question - pure hypocrisy. 

[Dave]

ETA on that ignore function, dave?

 

SMF 2.0 final. That is to say, .