Dave Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 If it was so good then why did Keegan finish last season, played pre season and the four games before he fucked off playing a standard 4-4-2? Since when was Keegan infallible btw? I didn't claim he was, my point is that in his last 6 or so competitive games he didn't use the formation, he didn't even use it in pre season when it would have been the perfect opportunity to get other players used to playing in it and finding out who is capable of filling in certain positions when the usual suspects are out injured. That tells me that he didn't have any intention of going with it long term, but I'm happy to discuss it if anyone thinks I'm wrong on the subject. Nobody asked what Keegan's preferred side was, the question was asked of us lot. Anything to get in a dig about Keegan fucking off like. FWIW in pre-season you agreed with me: http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,54679.msg1419094.html#msg1419094 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 If it was so good then why did Keegan finish last season, played pre season and the four games before he fucked off playing a standard 4-4-2? Since when was Keegan infallible btw? I didn't claim he was, my point is that in his last 6 or so competitive games he didn't use the formation, he didn't even use it in pre season when it would have been the perfect opportunity to get other players used to playing in it and finding out who is capable of filling in certain positions when the usual suspects are out injured. That tells me that he didn't have any intention of going with it long term, but I'm happy to discuss it if anyone thinks I'm wrong on the subject. Nobody asked what Keegan's preferred side was, the question was asked of us lot. Anything to get in a dig about Keegan fucking off like. FWIW in pre-season you agreed with me: http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,54679.msg1419094.html#msg1419094 It's not a dig at Keegan fucking off at all, I've simply pointed out that it was a system that he didn't show any signs of sticking with over the long term. I didn't say I didn't like the formation either so I'm not sure what you hoped to achieve from posting that link, perhaps you didn't think that bit through properly, if you can be bothered to look I'm sure there's more posts from me saying that I'd like to see the formation used with Barton and Jonas in midfield rather than Geremi as I think both have a great workrate needed for that position although I think Viduka is finished as a top level striker so he wouldn't be much use to us now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 We'll need all the help we can find with our next couple of home games, unpleasant stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 That team is nice like, hope we'll eventually get to play something like our best 11. Would love to see us give Hull a stuffing, they are on a major downer. Also, in hyper-optimism, Nacho might come in and keep us up with 6 or 7 games of genius! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 If it was so good then why did Keegan finish last season, played pre season and the four games before he f***ed off playing a standard 4-4-2? Since when was Keegan infallible btw? I didn't claim he was, my point is that in his last 6 or so competitive games he didn't use the formation, he didn't even use it in pre season when it would have been the perfect opportunity to get other players used to playing in it and finding out who is capable of filling in certain positions when the usual suspects are out injured. That tells me that he didn't have any intention of going with it long term, but I'm happy to discuss it if anyone thinks I'm wrong on the subject. Nobody asked what Keegan's preferred side was, the question was asked of us lot. Anything to get in a dig about Keegan f***ing off like. FWIW in pre-season you agreed with me: http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,54679.msg1419094.html#msg1419094 It's not a dig at Keegan f***ing off at all, I've simply pointed out that it was a system that he didn't show any signs of sticking with over the long term. I didn't say I didn't like the formation either so I'm not sure what you hoped to achieve from posting that link, perhaps you didn't think that bit through properly, if you can be bothered to look I'm sure there's more posts from me saying that I'd like to see the formation used with Barton and Jonas in midfield rather than Geremi as I think both have a great workrate needed for that position although I think Viduka is finished as a top level striker so he wouldn't be much use to us now. Owen had the mumps amongst other ailments and secret operations he was hiding from us all and Viduka was the size of a whale, and so I think Keegan didn't feel there was any point playing that formation with the likes of Shola and Smith who are too slow brained to comprehend it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Harper Beye Coloccini Bassong Enrique Guthrie Barton Jonas Carroll Martins Owen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 as a 442: Harper Beye Colo Bassong Enrique Taylor Nolan Guthrie Jonas Martins Viduka Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oh the thought of Keegan and that potential 4-3-3 line-up. It's pointless even discussing it now tbh, it's never ever going to happen again. Harper Beye Coloccini Bassong Enrique Taylor Nolan Barton Gutierrez Martins Owen Subs: Krul, Taylor, Cacapa, Duff, Guthrie, Viduka, Carroll ... that would probably be my favoured starting eleven. There are question marks on whether or not Taylor is ideal for the wing - Duff being the other option. But i think it's important to have atleast one winger who can provide an aerial ball into the box, with a certain degree of accuracy; Jonas and Duff don't fall into that category. Arguably Guthrie in for Nolan, too. What's for sure though, even though it'd be pretty limited from a technical perspective, that midfield there wouldn't be walked over with the ease we've seen throughout the season. It's tragic what a good side we've had on paper all season - it's a top 8 (or whatever you wanna call it) side without a doubt. And whilst it'll help... in all fairness, it's only really been 2009 where we've had these serious injury troubles. Out of that eleven, only Barton was out long-term in this season in 08. Manager, people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peder75 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I'm surprised none before Optomystyc Knight had Raylor in their eleven. Our corners and freekicks has been on another level since he joined. Raylor also did quite well when he played in a central position after Nolan was sent off. He would be my first choice in a three man midfield too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 When we've got our full squad available again I'd go back to the 4-3-3 with Owen playing the same role as last year, with Nolan making way. Owen is quicker across the pitch and posesses far more skill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 for home games: Harper Beye Colo Seba Jose Barton Nolan Jonas Owen Duke Oba For aways sacrifise Duke/Owen and bring in Guthrie or Geremi. That's the one I would go for, Nolan and Barton possibly swapping position depending on where they work best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oh the thought of Keegan and that potential 4-3-3 line-up. It's pointless even discussing it now tbh, it's never ever going to happen again. Harper Beye Coloccini Bassong Enrique Taylor Nolan Barton Gutierrez Martins Owen Subs: Krul, Taylor, Cacapa, Duff, Guthrie, Viduka, Carroll ... that would probably be my favoured starting eleven. There are question marks on whether or not Taylor is ideal for the wing - Duff being the other option. But i think it's important to have atleast one winger who can provide an aerial ball into the box, with a certain degree of accuracy; Jonas and Duff don't fall into that category. Arguably Guthrie in for Nolan, too. What's for sure though, even though it'd be pretty limited from a technical perspective, that midfield there wouldn't be walked over with the ease we've seen throughout the season. It's tragic what a good side we've had on paper all season - it's a top 8 (or whatever you wanna call it) side without a doubt. And whilst it'll help... in all fairness, it's only really been 2009 where we've had these serious injury troubles. Out of that eleven, only Barton was out long-term in this season in 08. Manager, people. That's what gets me when people say the "structure didn't work". I think with the recruitment policy with Keegan as manager, we'd at the very least be where the likes of Wigan are, pushing for a top 8 spot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Where are the details for this march like? I like a good protest march. Will there be Cockney Mafia out banners? I'm only going if there'll be Cockney Mafia out banners. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Wouldn't it be great if Nacho turned out to be good? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Nolan should not play ahead of a fully fit Guthrie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Harper Beye Coloccini Bassong Enrique Raylor Nolan Barton Jonas Viduka Martins SUBS: Krul, Saylor, Geremi, Duff, Owen, Ameobi, Guthrie Lovenkrands, Cacapa, Ranger, Caroll, Butt and Smith dont even make the bench......we really do have a pretty good squad. now we just need to sort the manager out. is there any way our permanant injury struggles can stop? we're long past the point where its a coincidence. something needs to be done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 28, 2009 Share Posted February 28, 2009 Nolan should not play ahead of a fully fit Guthrie Or Owen in an attacking midfield role. He should fight it out with Butt and Smith for the holding role in midfield IMO. Who the fuck would win the role is beyond me, which really means they are all shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now