Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, what's the word on the streets about the line-up tomorrow? Carroll back?

 

Wouldn't be too much against that idea tbh. Especially with Chielini being out tomorrow.

 

Be amazed if it wasn't the same XI.

 

Been little talk of change in the press.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what's the word on the streets about the line-up tomorrow? Carroll back?

 

Wouldn't be too much against that idea tbh. Especially with Chielini being out tomorrow.

 

Be amazed if it wasn't the same XI.

 

Been little talk of change in the press.

 

Ok, fair enough then. Of course, why change a winning team. But think Carroll done really well against Sweden - as well as Wellbeck.

 

Shame that there has to be a place for Rooney. Saying that, he's the one, on form, who can and should make the difference tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be a cover of Top Gun or something. :lol:

 

Btw, who's the Beckham look-alike back there? Green?

 

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0fT26a40q21sP/610x.jpg

:lol: :lol:

 

Why is it so many of these fucking simpletons are unable to leave the protection of a bus or a hotel without taking their headphones with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chiellini has been their best CB so far. Big blow to them that he'll be missing. As already said, think Carroll would be ideal.

 

Wasn't it he who dropped a ricket against Croatia?

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chiellini has been their best CB so far. Big blow to them that he'll be missing. As already said, think Carroll would be ideal.

 

Wasn't it he who dropped a ricket against Croatia?

 

Twas.

 

Probs his only real mistake all tournament and cost them that win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be a cover of Top Gun or something. :lol:

 

Btw, who's the Beckham look-alike back there? Green?

 

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0fT26a40q21sP/610x.jpg

:lol: :lol:

 

Why is it so many of these fucking simpletons are unable to leave the protection of a bus or a hotel without taking their headphones with them?

 

Breathe in.

 

Think about all your money.

 

Breathe out.

 

Etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would definitely play Welbeck then. Carroll as impact sub. No pace in their central pairing there.

 

Thing is I reckon Italian defenders will just have a laugh against Welbeck, as much as I rate him I think he'll be easily delt with. Carroll may be limited and predictable but might just surprise them and bully them, as cliche as it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would definitely play Welbeck then. Carroll as impact sub. No pace in their central pairing there.

 

Thing is I reckon Italian defenders will just have a laugh against Welbeck, as much as I rate him I think he'll be easily delt with. Carroll may be limited and predictable but might just surprise them and bully them, as cliche as it is.

 

See what you mean but given how deep England are liable to play aside from the punt there is literally no out ball though. They'll be able to defend on the halfway line, at least with Welbeck it gives the threat of in behind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd probably play Carroll, but it's probably only worth doing so if England are committed to playing a bit more of a possession game and manoeuvring the ball out wide to truly promising angles - rather than long diagonals from the half-way line, or straight balls he can't do much with.

 

He isn't going to be able to get on every ball, and (especially with the "quality" of England's creative players) not every ball will be a good'un - so to some degree it would be a percentage thing which would require a concerted gameplan and a few tries. I can't see England being so optimistic and attacking, so it's probably better to start with Welbeck in the scheme of England's (probable?) attitude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd probably play Carroll, but it's probably only worth doing so if England are committed to playing a bit more of a possession game and manoeuvring the ball out wide to truly promising angles - rather than long diagonals from the half-way line, or straight balls he can't do much with.

 

He isn't going to be able to get on every ball, and (especially with the "quality" of England's creative players) not every ball will be a good'un - so to some degree it would be a percentage thing which would require a concerted gameplan and a few tries. I can't see England being so optimistic and attacking, so it's probably better to start with Welbeck in the scheme of England's (probable?) attitude.

 

Given Scott Parkers ability on the ball I'd say this is a null point :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

That image of him scrambling around on all fours the other day like a dog, when faced with the agility and skill of a superior technical player is just the perfect representation of the sum of his stature in the game. All commitment, no skill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...