Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 This game is turgid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 fulham getting a bit of a football lesson atm can't get the ball ,1-1 atm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 fulham getting a bit of a football lesson atm can't get the ball ,1-1 atm Shakhtar play some brilliant football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Must be fucking annoying playing against Shakhtar like. Keeping the ball endlessly here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 What a shite game of football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Shaktar are a great side, gave us a game for the European Supercup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 i miss us on channel 5, we we're like partners with them on the glenn roeder uefa cup run Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Shaktar are a great side, gave us a game for the European Supercup. That game was turgid as f***. But yeah they're a great side, their Brazilian legion in particular are so good on the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Shaktar are a great side, gave us a game for the European Supercup. That game was turgid as f***. But yeah they're a great side, their Brazilian legion in particular are so good on the ball. That's what they are good at though, they sleep the game down and use their pacy forwards to drive counterattacks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Shaktar are a great side, gave us a game for the European Supercup. They were completely negative in that match though. Made no attempt to play any kind of attacking football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 i miss us on channel 5, we we're like partners with them on the glenn roeder uefa cup run someone says that every time theres a waffa cup game on I agree though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 That first leg against Alkmaar was absolutely brilliant. Shame about the second one though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Great goal by Zamora. 2-1 Fulham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Liverpool are shocking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Liverpool are shocking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 i just can't f***ing understand why nobody came in for Keita before he signed for Galatasaray, madness Probaly something to do with him being disasterously bad at Lyon. Massive waste of money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Sweet finish from Ben Arfa. 2-1 Marseille. he's a good player though all in all, always rated him He was brilliant at Lille, definitely and looked decent the last ACN, but has generally been disappointing since getting his big money move. 3-1. Charles Kabore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 That quick freekick last night by Porto was bullshit. There was no way any of the players were prepared to defend it which they should have been given some time to do. Fabianski was a bit naive, should have held onto it and risked a booking, but I guess with the game he had been having he didn't want to step on any more toes, so I understand why he did it. SSN showing clips of Henry taking quick free kicks against Chelsea, but at least they had a chance to put up a wall and get some men back for it. There's no requirement to let the defence get ready before taking a quick freekick. That's the whole point of it. has our resident ref been in on this yet ? as i understand it, if they are going to take a quick free kick the atacking team still have get an ok from the ref before the defence has organised. some refs will let it go if it is in a non threatening area (ie not a shot). OK - my Ref Perspective 1 - the foul being committed takes advantage away from the other team, so the defending team has no rights. 2 - LOTG says the defending team must be 10 yards back - it's their responsibility to retreat 10 yards and the referee should only intervene if they are refusing to. 3 - Attacking team does not have to ask for 10 yards - that's a given, but if they ask for the referee to enforce it, then they must wait for the whistle (ceremonial restart) to take the kick. 4 - If the attacking team does not ask the referee to enforce the 10 yards, and elect to take a quick-kick then they have that right (and accept the concequences of defenders being closer) So.....no problem taking a quick free kick and catching out the defenders who were not ready. (Hope that the referee wasn't really interfering with defenders - but likely defenders looking to blame someone/anyone for their mistake). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 bindippers win 1-0, tie in balance imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 bindippers win 1-0, tie in balance imo 1-0 at home isn't a great result at all. I wouldn't be surprised to see them go out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 bindippers win 1-0, tie in balance imo 1-0 at home isn't a great result at all. I wouldn't be surprised to see them go out. better to win 1-0 at home and lose 1-0 away. I mean, at least they dont have any away goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 bindippers win 1-0, tie in balance imo 1-0 at home isn't a great result at all. I wouldn't be surprised to see them go out. better to win 1-0 at home and lose 1-0 away. I mean, at least they dont have any away goals. Can only see them going out on penalties - Unirea won't win by 2 goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 That quick freekick last night by Porto was bullshit. There was no way any of the players were prepared to defend it which they should have been given some time to do. Fabianski was a bit naive, should have held onto it and risked a booking, but I guess with the game he had been having he didn't want to step on any more toes, so I understand why he did it. SSN showing clips of Henry taking quick free kicks against Chelsea, but at least they had a chance to put up a wall and get some men back for it. There's no requirement to let the defence get ready before taking a quick freekick. That's the whole point of it. has our resident ref been in on this yet ? as i understand it, if they are going to take a quick free kick the atacking team still have get an ok from the ref before the defence has organised. some refs will let it go if it is in a non threatening area (ie not a shot). OK - my Ref Perspective 1 - the foul being committed takes advantage away from the other team, so the defending team has no rights. 2 - LOTG says the defending team must be 10 yards back - it's their responsibility to retreat 10 yards and the referee should only intervene if they are refusing to. 3 - Attacking team does not have to ask for 10 yards - that's a given, but if they ask for the referee to enforce it, then they must wait for the whistle (ceremonial restart) to take the kick. 4 - If the attacking team does not ask the referee to enforce the 10 yards, and elect to take a quick-kick then they have that right (and accept the concequences of defenders being closer) So.....no problem taking a quick free kick and catching out the defenders who were not ready. (Hope that the referee wasn't really interfering with defenders - but likely defenders looking to blame someone/anyone for their mistake). I'm sure that, by the letter of the law, the goal had to stand. What's more, both Campbell and Fabianski weren't too clever in how they dealt with the situation. However, I think the ref was in breach of Law 18 - which is to use your common sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Not really a good day for Spanish teams in the competition. Atlético, Bilbao and Villarreal conceded at home and tied their games, Valencia lost away... Valencia can make it at home, and Atlético should really advance if they pull their finger out of their ass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts