Mowen Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I reckon the number 9 should be respected, call it meaningless but it's nice to have a little tradition. We don't have to wear black and white stripes next season but there'd be uproar if we didn't. A nice little tradition? It's a load of mythical bullshit. We've had some absolute dross wear it over the years, just since we've had Andy Cole we've been spoilt in that respect. Yes tradition, you are aware tradition can start at any time in history? The number is always heavily associated with Newcastle anyway and its not surprising considering those who have wore it. Best player I've seen in black and white wore number 8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Really? Fucking hell always remembered them as being close to each other. An advert as to why not to take drugs I guess. Was 0-0 though aye? Love the honesty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I remember JAB keeping Henry quiet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I remember JAB keeping Henry quiet. and bramble getting bergkamp subbed at half time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Didn't Taylor pick '27' because of Woodgate? I've warmed to the lad in the last 6 months but that's absolutely f***ing embarrassing Bit of Albert as well maybe? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I reckon the number 9 should be respected, call it meaningless but it's nice to have a little tradition. We don't have to wear black and white stripes next season but there'd be uproar if we didn't. A nice little tradition? It's a load of mythical bullshit. We've had some absolute dross wear it over the years, just since we've had Andy Cole we've been spoilt in that respect. Yes tradition, you are aware tradition can start at any time in history? The number is always heavily associated with Newcastle anyway and its not surprising considering those who have wore it. Best player I've seen in black and white wore number 8. damn right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Woodgate was a legend. the only time I can remember him having a rough ride was when he was playing for Leeds against the toon. he came up against an inspired #9 shirt that day. Freshly laundered and crsiply ironed, the shirt was on fire that day, creasing this way and that, sending Woodgate into a flap with the fumes of Comfort pure ( 2 for 1 special deal at Asda). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Really? f***ing hell always remembered them as being close to each other. An advert as to why not to take drugs I guess. Was 0-0 though aye? and you had a go at me for being a little too indulgent with the alcohol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Harewood no 10 NEWCASTLE United have completed the loan signing of Aston Villa striker Marlon Harewood. The 30-year-old, who will wear squad No.10, arrived at the club's North Tyneside headquarters this morning before putting the finishing touches to a three-month deal. Harewood will train with his new team-mates today before travelling with the squad to Suffolk for this weekend's Championship clash against Ipswich Town. The Londoner has netted 119 goals from 305 career starts, his most fruitful spell coming during a four-year stay at West Ham when he found the back of the net 56 times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 better than 1 in 3, should shut a few people up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Hasn't scored one for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Get rid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 f***ing hell man, Woodgate is a drunken c*** of a human being who had 1 1/2 good seasons with us. You'd think he was Paulo f***ing Maldini with 15 years in black and white. Taylor shouldn't be trying to emulate anyone, make your own career without that stupid b****** as a template. Had one and half good seasons? He was only here for one and a half seasons and barring injuries was absolute quality, head and shoulders above everyone else. Plus didn't Taylor chose the number because of Albert? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes1986 Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 On the pitch we will probably never see a defender as good as Woodgate in a Newcastle shirt again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Please don't give him the number 9 Will get number 10 his old West Ham number, I reckon. Like Marlon fucking Harewood was going to get the number nine shirt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 On the pitch we will probably never see a defender as good as Woodgate in a Newcastle shirt again. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/02/23/article-0-0213F8E60000044D-152_306x423.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 If Marlon harewood starts ahead of Nile Ranger the management want shooting ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Didn't Taylor pick '27' because of Woodgate? I've warmed to the lad in the last 6 months but that's absolutely f***ing embarrassing Bit of Albert as well maybe? Fairly certain he chose it because of Albert. Remember reading an article on it somewhere after he'd been offered a different number but didn't want to switch because of the Albert influence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 On the pitch we will probably never see a defender as good as Woodgate in a Newcastle shirt again. http://lagalaxy.theoffside.com/files/2008/01/babayaro.jpg FYP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 If Marlon harewood starts ahead of Nile Ranger the management want shooting ! Disagree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 If Marlon harewood starts ahead of Nile Ranger the management want shooting ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 If Marlon harewood starts ahead of Nile Ranger the management want shooting ! Disagree. Ranger will have his time, we need goals regularly tbh and Harewood is a better option at present. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Just putting out a hypothetical situation: what if Harewood doesn't score in his first 4-5 games? Should Ranger come back in? That's all the chance Ranger got to be fair and it was enough for people to write him off as not being a goal threat. The same way Carroll was dubbed to not be a goal threat either... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 If Marlon harewood starts ahead of Nile Ranger the management want shooting ! Totally disagree. It's still early for Ranger and he shouldn't be playing week in week out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Just putting out a hypothetical situation: what if Harewood doesn't score in his first 4-5 games? Should Ranger come back in? That's all the chance Ranger got to be fair and it was enough for people to write him off as not being a goal threat. The same way Carroll was dubbed to not be a goal threat either... I am not writing him off. Ranger has looked more likely to score in the games he came off the bench for 20+ minutes to be honest. Done a great job playing the lone role but he still has much to learn. Will have less pressure with cameos and will no doubt benefit from it. To be honest we have 3 strikers so assuming 2 up front theres plenty of chances for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now