Keefaz Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Could they let us borrow them? Doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Can they play in the reserve league, for example? No. Not allowed in any FA, FL, UEFA or FIFA sanctioned games. Basically that extends to anything with an FA sanctioned referee in charge. They could play closed doors games but in the eyes of FIFa their registration remains with the parent club. Trialists can and Sunday League matches are generally sanctioned by the FA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted September 18, 2009 Share Posted September 18, 2009 Could they let us borrow them? Yes, they can loan out unregistered players as they're still contracted to Chelsea, just unable to play for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealios Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Ban suspended so they can sign players in January. What a surprise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Ban suspended so they can sign players in January. What a surprise. Aye, wtach out world Ancelottis gonna have to go mental and sign about 8 players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 It's mental this, seems no football body has the power to enforce any of its rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dazzanufc1892 Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 legally, had to happen, if you are in the midst of an appeal, then the original ban has to be dropped incase it is found to be illegal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 legally, had to happen, if you are in the midst of an appeal, then the original ban has to be dropped incase it is found to be illegal I know, no need to be so logical though man! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 SHOCK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Can see them going nuts signing up and coming players just in case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Can see them going nuts signing up and coming players just in case. Yep, theyll sign loads of players I reckon. Probably come in for Taylor in a moment of madness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Urgghh... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summerof69 Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 to be fair chelsea arent he only club to have done this and lets remember they did give us duff hallf price Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Good news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted November 7, 2009 Share Posted November 7, 2009 to be fair chelsea arent he only club to have done this and lets remember they did give us duff hallf price Free would have been too much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/8499169.stm Page last updated at 18:06 GMT, Thursday, 4 February 2010 Court lifts Chelsea transfer ban over Kakuta signing Chelsea have had their transfer ban lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport after reaching an agreement with Lens over the signing of Gael Kakuta. A statement on the Cas website said that the two clubs and the player had accepted the player's contract with the French side was not valid. Thus Kakuta could not have terminated it prematurely, so Chelsea could not be liable for inducing it to be breached. The Cas said all parties agreed the proceedings would remain confidential. In September 2009, Fifa's Dispute Resolution Chamber imposed a four-month ban on the player and banned Chelsea from registering any new players in the next two transfer windows over the case. A statement on the club website from chairman Bruce Buck said Chelsea were glad to have resolved the matter amicably. "It was always our intention to work together with Lens to reach this end, and both clubs have strengthened their relationship as a result of resolving this case to everyone's satisfaction," he said. "In an act of good faith and with a view to the possibility of future collaboration with Lens, and without recognising any liability, Chelsea has agreed to pay compensation costs for the training given to the player while at Lens, as mandated by Fifa in its original ruling." Kakuta joined Chelsea in 2007 and finished his first season at the club as the youth team's top scorer, winning the academy's player of the year award. In his second season, he broke into the youth and reserve teams before suffering a double fracture of his ankle in February 2009. Chelsea lodged an appeal against the original Fifa ruling, allowing Kakuta to make his first-team debut in the 4-0 win over Wolves at the end of November. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolton Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/8499169.stm Page last updated at 18:06 GMT, Thursday, 4 February 2010 Court lifts Chelsea transfer ban over Kakuta signing Chelsea have had their transfer ban lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport after reaching an agreement with Lens over the signing of Gael Kakuta. A statement on the Cas website said that the two clubs and the player had accepted the player's contract with the French side was not valid. Thus Kakuta could not have terminated it prematurely, so Chelsea could not be liable for inducing it to be breached. The Cas said all parties agreed the proceedings would remain confidential. In September 2009, Fifa's Dispute Resolution Chamber imposed a four-month ban on the player and banned Chelsea from registering any new players in the next two transfer windows over the case. A statement on the club website from chairman Bruce Buck said Chelsea were glad to have resolved the matter amicably. "It was always our intention to work together with Lens to reach this end, and both clubs have strengthened their relationship as a result of resolving this case to everyone's satisfaction," he said. "In an act of good faith and with a view to the possibility of future collaboration with Lens, and without recognising any liability, Chelsea has agreed to pay compensation costs for the training given to the player while at Lens, as mandated by Fifa in its original ruling." Kakuta joined Chelsea in 2007 and finished his first season at the club as the youth team's top scorer, winning the academy's player of the year award. In his second season, he broke into the youth and reserve teams before suffering a double fracture of his ankle in February 2009. Chelsea lodged an appeal against the original Fifa ruling, allowing Kakuta to make his first-team debut in the 4-0 win over Wolves at the end of November. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/8499169.stm Page last updated at 18:06 GMT, Thursday, 4 February 2010 Court lifts Chelsea transfer ban over Kakuta signing Chelsea have had their transfer ban lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport after reaching an agreement with Lens over the signing of Gael Kakuta. A statement on the Cas website said that the two clubs and the player had accepted the player's contract with the French side was not valid. Thus Kakuta could not have terminated it prematurely, so Chelsea could not be liable for inducing it to be breached. The Cas said all parties agreed the proceedings would remain confidential. In September 2009, Fifa's Dispute Resolution Chamber imposed a four-month ban on the player and banned Chelsea from registering any new players in the next two transfer windows over the case. A statement on the club website from chairman Bruce Buck said Chelsea were glad to have resolved the matter amicably. "It was always our intention to work together with Lens to reach this end, and both clubs have strengthened their relationship as a result of resolving this case to everyone's satisfaction," he said. "In an act of good faith and with a view to the possibility of future collaboration with Lens, and without recognising any liability, Chelsea has agreed to pay compensation costs for the training given to the player while at Lens, as mandated by Fifa in its original ruling." Kakuta joined Chelsea in 2007 and finished his first season at the club as the youth team's top scorer, winning the academy's player of the year award. In his second season, he broke into the youth and reserve teams before suffering a double fracture of his ankle in February 2009. Chelsea lodged an appeal against the original Fifa ruling, allowing Kakuta to make his first-team debut in the 4-0 win over Wolves at the end of November. Anyone else smell a rat! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Does this include signing people who are out-of-contract...? It will be interesting to see how the decision is worded, as firms like Brabners Chaffe Street will be rubbing their hands with glee trying to work out loopholes for a significant fee. I'd be very surprised is this is upheld, as I would hazard a guess that the powers that be would deem the decision disproportionate and simply increase the compensation sum payable by Chelsea and rescind the ban. A sensible option would be for Chelsea to pay the potential market value of Kakuta, decided by an independent arbitrator, had he fulfilled his contract and Chelsea bought him at value. And for this, I pat myself on the back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 The right decision was made. Enforce the rules for everyone or don't enforce them at all. Same as with that nonsensical Eduardo diving ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 The right decision was made. Enforce the rules for everyone or don't enforce them at all. Same as with that nonsensical Eduardo diving ban. Wouldn't it be better to enforce them for everyone though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now