Cajun Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Legend http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/luton_town/6140922.stm Also slags off his chairman in another article calling him a liar and saying he has failed at everything he has done since he took over the club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40941000/jpg/_40941818_harry_bbc203.jpg Women - Know your limits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! :lazy: Considering the number of appalling performances by men, Poll & Renny in particular spring to mind, I think that men should not be allowed to referee any more matches. :winking: Considering the sheer stupidity of the idea that women can't referee just because of their sex, which always is spouted by males, then men should not be allowed an opinion. :winking: The woman referee last year who gave that stupid goal consulted with the lines-man because she did not have a clear view of the goal. It was a stupid decision, but she was following the rules by consulting with the assistant who was the one who said he did have a view of it. They were both wrong and rightly banned, but the man was wrong as well, more so because he had a better view. As usual, don't let facts get in the way of a good sexist rant though. :roll: oh, but you're probably only joking. ah ... hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! :lazy: Considering the number of appalling performances by men, Poll & Renny in particular spring to mind, I think that men should not be allowed to referee any more matches. :winking: Considering the sheer stupidity of the idea that women can't referee just because of their sex, which always is spouted by males, then men should not be allowed an opinion. :winking: The woman referee last year who gave that stupid goal consulted with the lines-man because she did not have a clear view of the goal. It was a stupid decision, but she was following the rules by consulting with the assistant who was the one who said he did have a view of it. They were both wrong and rightly banned, but the man was wrong as well, more so because he had a better view. As usual, don't let facts get in the way of a good sexist rant though. :roll: oh, but you're probably only joking. ah ... hilarious. Quiet dear, men talking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! :lazy: Considering the number of appalling performances by men, Poll & Renny in particular spring to mind, I think that men should not be allowed to referee any more matches. :winking: Considering the sheer stupidity of the idea that women can't referee just because of their sex, which always is spouted by males, then men should not be allowed an opinion. :winking: The woman referee last year who gave that stupid goal consulted with the lines-man because she did not have a clear view of the goal. It was a stupid decision, but she was following the rules by consulting with the assistant who was the one who said he did have a view of it. They were both wrong and rightly banned, but the man was wrong as well, more so because he had a better view. As usual, don't let facts get in the way of a good sexist rant though. :roll: oh, but you're probably only joking. ah ... hilarious. Quiet dear, men talking. not a chance pet. someone has to keep you in line now and then! :winking: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 :own: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Nowt wrong with women referees IMO http://www.partytimerentals.com/catalog/images/site_images/sexy_referee.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 She has a very flat chin! blueeek.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes1986 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 She has a very flat chin! blueeek.gif Ahggg! What in the hell? http://www.theamericanmind.com/images/conehead.jpg blink.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 haha, im with Newell, legendary comments from a legandary bloke. Its a mans game. End of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 She has a very flat chin! blueeek.gif :lol: I thought someone had somehow got a picture of me till it got to the face and chin. yikes! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 She has a very flat chin! blueeek.gif Ahggg! What in the hell? http://www.theamericanmind.com/images/conehead.jpg blink.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 stupid that they should be judged because they're women, she should be judged because she's shit just like every other ref... it just happens to be more likely that she is shit as she's a woman... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! :lazy: Considering the number of appalling performances by men, Poll & Renny in particular spring to mind, I think that men should not be allowed to referee any more matches. :winking: Considering the sheer stupidity of the idea that women can't referee just because of their sex, which always is spouted by males, then men should not be allowed an opinion. :winking: The woman referee last year who gave that stupid goal consulted with the lines-man because she did not have a clear view of the goal. It was a stupid decision, but she was following the rules by consulting with the assistant who was the one who said he did have a view of it. They were both wrong and rightly banned, but the man was wrong as well, more so because he had a better view. As usual, don't let facts get in the way of a good sexist rant though. :roll: oh, but you're probably only joking. ah ... hilarious. She was just asking the linesman if her bum looked big in her shorts tbh. Mmm, just noticed something. Ref's assistant getting a tongue lashing snoopy.gif from Mike Newell was called "Amy Rayner". "Toon Amy" is defending her(self)? :wink: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 stupid that they should be judged because they're women, she should be judged because she's shit just like every other ref... it just happens to be more likely that she is shit as she's a woman... :roll: oh you had to add the last bit didn't you? replace the word woman, with black or asian and see how you feel about it then. funny how racism is frowned upon but sexism is celebrated! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Wasn't a goal given years ago in a match at Chelsea ( i think ) where the ball didn't go in but hit the stanchion on the outside? What about the arsehole who allowed the handballed 'goal' by Maradona in the Argie/England match? This thread could go on forever if people start posting about shite decisions by refereee's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 "I thought someone had somehow got a picture of me till it got to the face and chin." So, it was the blonde hair that did it eh? blueeek.gif Sherlock?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Wasn't a goal given years ago in a match at Chelsea ( i think ) where the ball didn't go in but hit the stanchion on the outside? What about the arsehole who allowed the handballed 'goal' by Maradona in the Argie/England match? This thread could go on forever if people start posting about shite decisions by refereee's. thank you! I know you lads are only joking like, but it does get a bit tired after a while. So I had to say something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Considering the number of appalling performances by women per game refereed/lines-personed, I think Newell has it bang on. And - whatever happened to freedom of speech ? Remember the woman referee last year that gave a goal when it hit a back post or somesuch ? Wendy-something - she managed something that has not been done by male referees EVER ! :lazy: Considering the number of appalling performances by men, Poll & Renny in particular spring to mind, I think that men should not be allowed to referee any more matches. :winking: Considering the sheer stupidity of the idea that women can't referee just because of their sex, which always is spouted by males, then men should not be allowed an opinion. :winking: The woman referee last year who gave that stupid goal consulted with the lines-man because she did not have a clear view of the goal. It was a stupid decision, but she was following the rules by consulting with the assistant who was the one who said he did have a view of it. They were both wrong and rightly banned, but the man was wrong as well, more so because he had a better view. As usual, don't let facts get in the way of a good sexist rant though. :roll: oh, but you're probably only joking. ah ... hilarious. She was just asking the linesman if her bum looked big in her shorts tbh. Mmm, just noticed something. Ref's assistant getting a tongue lashing snoopy.gif from Mike Newell was called "Amy Rayner". "Toon Amy" is defending her(self)? :wink: damn!! well does it? ... does my bum look big in those shorts? :winking: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Can't believe the FA are saying they will investigate his comments. Freedom of speech? There is no rule that says you cannot insult women, if he gets charged the FA will be as pathetically PC as the rest of the country. Not that I particularly condone what he says, but its the principle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Amy Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Can't believe the FA are saying they will investigate his comments. Freedom of speech? There is no rule that says you cannot insult women, if he gets charged the FA will be as pathetically PC as the rest of the country. Not that I particularly condone what he says, but its the principle. So if he said that Uriah Rennie was a shite referee because he was black, would you still feel the same. Perhaps there are some that would, but the majority would see why that is stupid, so why should it be different? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Can't believe the FA are saying they will investigate his comments. Freedom of speech? There is no rule that says you cannot insult women, if he gets charged the FA will be as pathetically PC as the rest of the country. Not that I particularly condone what he says, but its the principle. So if he said that Uriah Rennie was a shite referee because he was black, would you still feel the same. Perhaps there are some that would, but the majority would see why that is stupid, so why should it be different? No because that is racist, which isn't allowed. Sexism isn't right, but he's in his right to say it, its not breaking the law. Newell isn't in charge of the FA, if he was and he said sacked all female officials then fair enough - thats sexual discrimination, but he's just a manager giving a view. If he's not allowed to say that, then fucking anti-male rubbish like Loose Women on itv should be taken off aswell. I hate the programme, but the women are in every right to say what they do. In the same way 'Loose Men' would be perfectly entitled, but it would create WW3 with feminists kicking off left, right and centre. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now