Jump to content

We can't be caught. CHAMPIONS.


Recommended Posts

Ipswich

Reading

Scunny

Palace

Wednesday

 

 

According to this anyway: http://www.nufc.com/2009-10html/table.html

 

The.com table only indicates how low we could finish not which teams can finish below us. Its based on the worst case result being applied each time to maximise the number of teams above us rather than having a preference for who that is.

 

Regardless we are safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ipswich

Reading

Scunny

Palace

Wednesday

 

 

According to this anyway: http://www.nufc.com/2009-10html/table.html

 

The.com table only indicates how low we could finish not which teams can finish below us. Its based on the worst case result being applied each time to maximise the number of teams above us rather than having a preference for who that is.

 

Regardless we are safe.

 

Unless we go into administration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to be good when over the next month or so that goes from 16th, to 14th, to 11th, to 8th, to 6th, to 3rd, to 2nd, to can't be caught. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday          35 - 37 - 70

plymouth              34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday           35 - 37 - 70

plymouth               34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

 

Have you made sure they dont play each other

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday           35 - 37 - 70

plymouth               34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

 

Have you made sure they dont play each other

 

 

Haven't - bad enough keeping up with our games never mind the rest of them..................

 

But we're firmly in the play-off zone and we can't be relegated and I'd guess a lot of us would have settled for that at eh start of the season TBH

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday           35 - 37 - 70

plymouth               34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

 

Have you made sure they dont play each other

wouldn't matter if they played each other as it would mean each could overtake us but not all.
Link to post
Share on other sites

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday           35 - 37 - 70

plymouth               34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

 

Have you made sure they dont play each other

wouldn't matter if they played each other as it would mean each could overtake us but not all.

 

Aye but that is how the .com table is done, not useful for this thread tbh. your approach is correct for this thread...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

they're wrong - it's only the bottom three that can't catch us

 

we have 72 points

 

Palace                P34 - pts 37 - Max 73

wednesday           35 - 37 - 70

plymouth               34 - 30 - 66

posh                      35-27-60

 

God knows how NUFC.com put their table together

 

Have you made sure they dont play each other

wouldn't matter if they played each other as it would mean each could overtake us but not all.

 

Aye but that is how the .com table is done, not useful for this thread tbh. your approach is correct for this thread...

 

Thats what i mean re .com

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Phil K

Personally not interested until we can't be caught by the team in THIRD place.

Prob. Forest, or maybe Swansea while WBA seem to be being guided by the referees association. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...