Guest neesy111 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wasn't impressed by the tracking back of players at the end of the game mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morla84 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Shows how small our squad is and that a few players had found their level last season in the Championship. A few injuries and we'll really struggle this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 My Ratings...... ....Who gives a shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Krul-6 - average game bad keeping for the first Raylor-6- another average on par with perch as an rb Perch-6.5- best game ive seen from him so far Williamson-7- solid Kadar-7- good performance deffo one for the future Routledge-6.5- looks like hes not arsed attitude doesnt impress me Smith-7- good game by his standards if that shot in the first half had gone in Guthrie-6.5- good passer terrible corners Vuckic-8- MOTM for me strong fast good passer Ranger -7- done his job looked strong Lovenkrands-6- unnoticable Carroll-7- good when he came on brought on to late imo Jonas-7-see carroll Barton-7- good on the ball didnt see the tackle that got him a yellow The reason you didn't notice him was he only touched the ball on two occasions - and each time he was offside. I know I go on about it, but what's the point of playing him? He's not giving anything to the side. Aye. Enough's enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Howay, Guthrie was gash again. 4 is a compliment. Better than Barton You got to be shitting me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wenger really doesn't like Burton. It's so obvious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Howay, Guthrie was gash again. 4 is a compliment. Better than Barton I know you're trying to wind me up but Barton wasn't on for long and he was planning ahead by trying to injure as many people as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wasn't impressed by the tracking back of players at the end of the game mind. Aye. Wasn't impressed with the pushing forward either - at 2-0, they just seemed to stand in the centre of the pitch and not move. There was a ball played into the box by Carroll and Ranger was there by himself at one point - no Guthrie, no Vuckic, no Smith, no Taylor - disgraceful considering we had nowt to lose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wenger really doesn't like Burton. It's so obvious. Yeah, heard he prefers Primark the stingy cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc4eva Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Guthrie was shocking I thought as was raylor. We panicked most the time on the ball and hesitated to much at others on the ball what is the point in lovenkrands anymore BTW, non existent ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Krul-6 - average game bad keeping for the first Raylor-6- another average on par with perch as an rb Perch-6.5- best game ive seen from him so far Williamson-7- solid Kadar-7- good performance deffo one for the future Routledge-6.5- looks like hes not arsed attitude doesnt impress me Smith-7- good game by his standards if that shot in the first half had gone in Guthrie-6.5- good passer terrible corners Vuckic-8- MOTM for me strong fast good passer Ranger -7- done his job looked strong Lovenkrands-6- unnoticable Carroll-7- good when he came on brought on to late imo Jonas-7-see carroll Barton-7- good on the ball didnt see the tackle that got him a yellow The reason you didn't notice him was he only touched the ball on two occasions - and each time he was offside. I know I go on about it, but what's the point of playing him? He's not giving anything to the side. Aye. Enough's enough. We know you hate Lovenkrands. Please stop it now, we get it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wenger really doesn't like Burton. It's so obvious. Yeah, heard he prefers Primark the stingy cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Begbie Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Krul-6 - average game bad keeping for the first Raylor-6- another average on par with perch as an rb Perch-6.5- best game ive seen from him so far Williamson-7- solid Kadar-7- good performance deffo one for the future Routledge-6.5- looks like hes not arsed attitude doesnt impress me Smith-7- good game by his standards if that shot in the first half had gone in Guthrie-6.5- good passer terrible corners Vuckic-8- MOTM for me strong fast good passer Ranger -7- done his job looked strong Lovenkrands-6- unnoticable Carroll-7- good when he came on brought on to late imo Jonas-7-see carroll Barton-7- good on the ball didnt see the tackle that got him a yellow The reason you didn't notice him was he only touched the ball on two occasions - and each time he was offside. I know I go on about it, but what's the point of playing him? He's not giving anything to the side. Aye. Enough's enough. Didnt he sign a three year contract last year? I hope i'll never see him in a newcastle shirt again.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishMagpie Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Boils my piss the commentator going on about them making 9 changes and still whipping us. Like we had our first team out there!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Guthrie struggles to complete 90 at the best of times. He should've come off for Carroll. Was running through water at the end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Boils my piss the commentator going on about them making 9 changes and still whipping us. Like we had our first team out there!! why let facts stand in the way of bumming one of the big sides eh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Wenger really doesn't like Burton. It's so obvious. Yeah, heard he prefers Primark the stingy cunt. class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Perch was OK tonight imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishMagpie Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! He's one of these "100% effort" players but the effort is so misdirected it's unreal. Comparing him tonight to Tiote on Saturday is like night & day (no pun intended:-). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now