Jump to content

Not worthy of a thread - 2018 FIFA World Cup edition


Recommended Posts

I love this place, but this thread is pathetic. It reeks of bitterness and double standards regarding football and politics. :lol:

 

I like that they gave them to two completely different countries that have never hosted the world cup before. That's the way it should be, as FIFA represents all footballing nations, even those without footballing history and same views (on life and politics) as yours.

 

I think both will be excellent wc's.  O0

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a national football team, yes?

 

Accrington Stanley have a stadium, doesn't mean they should host England internationals

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a national football team, yes?

 

So do San Marino but it doesn't mean they should host a World Cup.

 

A team that has never qualified and doesn't look like it will any time soon shouldn't host a World Cup whether that is Qatar, San Marino, Nicaragua, Bangladesh or any other country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any nation who has a national football team, and are capable of hosting a World Cup should have the same opportunity to do so as everyone else.

 

Can't you just admit that the toys are well out of your pram, and get over it? Footballs "coming home" eventually, chin up!  O0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any nation who has a national football team, and are capable of hosting a World Cup should have the same opportunity to do so as everyone else.

 

Can't you just admit that the toys are well out of your pram, and get over it? Footballs "coming home" eventually, chin up!  O0

 

No one would have a problem if the 2018 or 2022 went to nations that provide "low risk" as the FIFA technical team reported. Also worth remembering England was not competing against the Doha 2022 bid so why would our toys be out of the pram for them getting a World Cup? We are just saying it how it is.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say I have done too much reading up on the low risk part, but if that was the primary attribute FIFA were looking for, we wouldn't have seen WC's in South Africa and S.Korea, would we?

 

Nations do a lot to accomodate the WC, as will Russia and Qatar. Can't see what major risks there are in them hosting a WC. At least none that can't be fixed in a 4 and 8 years time span.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say I have done too much reading up on the low risk part, but if that was the primary attribute FIFA were looking for, we wouldn't have seen WC's in South Africa and S.Korea, would we?

 

Not the case at all Japan & Korea were both classed as "Low risk". The USA has the best report out of all the bidders for either W/C the only two which did not get classed as low risk bids were Russia which was classed as "medium risk" & Qatar which was classed as "High risk". This is FIFA own report ffs!!!!

 

Have a look at http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,72682.1140.htm

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any nation who has a national football team, and are capable of hosting a World Cup should have the same opportunity to do so as everyone else.

Can't you just admit that the toys are well out of your pram, and get over it? Footballs "coming home" eventually, chin up!  O0

 

:lol:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any nation who has a national football team, and are capable of hosting a World Cup should have the same opportunity to do so as everyone else.

Can't you just admit that the toys are well out of your pram, and get over it? Footballs "coming home" eventually, chin up!  O0

 

:lol:

 

 

 

Do you just disagree, or have I written it wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

They certainly don't seem too pleased on FF.

 

I thought Jonathon Pearce's 3rd chin was going to explode with rage at one point.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it looks like all of them are highly fixable.

 

No surprise really, I could see by your earlier comments something such as FIFA own technical report would not change your view point.

 

Well, yeah. Shouldn't be as black and white as that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you just disagree, or have I written it wrong?

 

Maybe you should do some research on human rights before posting stuff like that.

 

Do you care to elaborate?

 

Say ex. a middle eastern country that won't allow women to attend football matches, or dress the way they want etc, then clearly they aren't capable of hosting a WC as many women would want to go to the WC and dress the way they want. My point stands for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it looks like all of them are highly fixable.

 

No surprise really, I could see by your earlier comments something such as FIFA own technical report would not change your view point.

 

Well, yeah. Shouldn't be as black and white as that.

 

A report by FIFA who rate things high & low risk should not have any impact? Give over man, anything classed as high risk should get the elbow at the point. Of course the areas with most risk mean there are is lot more money to be made in getting a place ready....KICKBACKS ALL ROUND!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...