adam1 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 We just need to get rid of it tbh. I've got a twitch in me baaals that tells me it's gonna be HBA tho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 They're changing it to the Numero Neuf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 We just need to get rid of it tbh. I've got a twitch in me baaals that tells me it's gonna be HBA tho. fuck, was just gonna say give it to HBA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBG Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 We should retire the number, no one currently or anyone that is going to sign is worthy of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Ben Arfa should be 10! 9 will look silly on him. Telling ya, it's being saved for a top forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 I've got a feelin we will get 2 strikers. Erding and a marquee (benzemae/Gomez) I base that on nothing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam1 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 STURRIDGE 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 STURRIDGE 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 STURRIDGE 9 I would fucking die of joy if that happen. http://susanwanchu.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/randymarshjizz.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ToonArmyST Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 shola 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Until a class striker comes in who can score 20+ goals a season then they should just retire it. That would be absolutely horrific and cringe worthy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Recoba Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Totally against retiring numbers. Squad numbers are a modern USA inspired thing to sell gear. Should 9 have been retired after Gallagher? Milburn? Macdonald? Cole? Ferdinand? Shearer? If not why the hell after Andy Carroll, a player inferior to any of the above. How can kids dream of wearing number 9 if its retired? Leave retiring numbers to vain twats like Burlusconi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Yep. I reckon the next main striker we sign should get it. Hardly a vote of confidence if we sign the next one and say, "oh we don't think you're good enough for the number 9" is it? Was different in the Championship doing that to Leon Best and co. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Liked that about Martins, we didn't get caught up with keeping it vacant. He wanted it so we just gave it to him. Should do the same again. Next player who comes in and wants it should get it. If Best wants a change even, would be happy for him to get it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogmatix Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 STURRIDGE 9 I would fucking die of joy if that happen. http://susanwanchu.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/randymarshjizz.jpg THIS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matta Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Signing Sturridge would kind of make me think this whole transfer window had been a dream. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Signing Sturridge would kind of make me think this whole transfer window had been a dream. I couldn't see us going for him because it seemed we were ignoring all domestic targets, but Ba, Taylor and N'Zogbia interest suggest otherwise... If Chelsea do sign a striker, then maybe.. just maybe.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matta Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Signing Sturridge would kind of make me think this whole transfer window had been a dream. I couldn't see us going for him because it seemed we were ignoring all domestic targets, but Ba, Taylor and N'Zogbia interest suggest otherwise... If Chelsea do sign a striker, then maybe.. just maybe.. but eventually we gonna need some english players also, with the homegrown rule and all.. Why not start with Sturridge.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Signing Sturridge would kind of make me think this whole transfer window had been a dream. I couldn't see us going for him because it seemed we were ignoring all domestic targets, but Ba, Taylor and N'Zogbia interest suggest otherwise... If Chelsea do sign a striker, then maybe.. just maybe.. He would certainly do well here with the through balls from the new Frenchies. I think Chelsea would be stupid to let him go, but like you say they might prefer to spend a fortune on someone from abroad. And he's had a good taste of first-team football now. Still unlikely, but I would love it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Gyan or Bent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Having snapped up a few cheapos/freebies in a few positions we needed strengthening, I see no reason why we can't test the water with a £15m-£20m bid for Sturridge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Having snapped up a few cheapos/freebies in a few positions we needed strengthening, I see no reason why we can't test the water with a £15m-£20m bid for Sturridge. Would love to see it, he'd be a Marquee signing, but there's not a chance in hell of us paying that on one player. I reckon £10 millionish would be our limit personally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Having snapped up a few cheapos/freebies in a few positions we needed strengthening, I see no reason why we can't test the water with a £15m-£20m bid for Sturridge. Would love to see it, he'd be a Marquee signing, but there's not a chance in hell of us paying that on one player. I reckon £10 millionish would be our limit personally. Unfortunately I agree but I don't agree with that, if you see what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 Aye we will not be bidding north of 10m for a player, sadly. Although, on the whole i don't mind us looking for bargains. I'd love Sturridge but i feel we will be scraping the far depths of Russia before investing in a young (expensive) english player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now