Jump to content

Connor wickham


Guest sicko2ndbest

Recommended Posts

Guest VegasToon

Who would you rather have Ben Arfa for 7 million or Wickham for 15 million? 

 

15 million is an obscene amount of money for him.  Like the poster said above you can easily scour the world and probably find 5 players with great potential for that kind of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How often do you think you can pick up Ben Arfa's and Tiotes? If it was that easy the transfer market would be far more sensible.

 

It is in most other countries. That's why we got HBA and Tiote in the last 12 months for a fraction of the fee it will cost to land Connor Whickham.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would you rather have Ben Arfa for 7 million or Wickham for 15 million? 

 

15 million is an obscene amount of money for him.  Like the poster said above you can easily scour the world and probably find 5 players with great potential for that kind of money.

 

How often do you think you can pick up Ben Arfa's and Tiotes? If it was that easy the transfer market would be far more sensible.

 

It is in most other countries. That's why we got HBA and Tiote in the last 12 months for a fraction of the fee it will cost to land Connor Whickham.

 

6m is the max amount we should gamble on him.  If it's higher than that, why not just buy an established international striker? 

 

Couldn't agree more!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who would you rather have Ben Arfa for 7 million or Wickham for 15 million? 

 

15 million is an obscene amount of money for him.  Like the poster said above you can easily scour the world and probably find 5 players with great potential for that kind of money.

 

How often do you think you can pick up Ben Arfa's and Tiotes? If it was that easy the transfer market would be far more sensible.

 

It is in most other countries. That's why we got HBA and Tiote in the last 12 months for a fraction of the fee it will cost to land Connor Whickham.

 

6m is the max amount we should gamble on him.  If it's higher than that, why not just buy an established international striker? 

 

Couldn't agree more!

 

Because a quality established international striker will cost £10M+, maybe only have seven good years left in him and will be a depreciating asset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because a quality established international striker will cost £10M+, maybe only have seven good years left in him and will be a depreciating asset.

 

So you're actually saying that you're not willing to buy an attacker that has proven his worth, but think it's ok to buy an attacker for more money but who has not much to show for, just because he's young and English

 

If we by an attacker that is established, who's 25-26 years old, he will not be an depreciating asset as long as he scores goals. If he do that, he will increase in value for 2-3 seasons, and we can sell him when he's around 28 with profit. 

 

On the other hand, Carr will find us a diamond. It's not likely that we will pay £10 mill for a player unless God commands Geravinhio to join us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest thenorthumbrian

Why is the argument that we should sign young players that will bring in a profit when we sell them ?

Here is a an idea, why not sign young players and keep them to try and build a good team ?

Who knows, one day we might have a team capable of competing with the best.   

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is the argument that we should sign young players that will bring in a profit when we sell them ?

Here is a an idea, why not sign young players and keep them to try and build a good team ?

Who knows, one day we might have a team capable of competing with the best.    

 

 

That's not my main argument actually. I'm all pro when it comes to buying the young and promising. But right now, I want to focus on signing players that will strengthen our first team right away. It's those buys that are important if we want to keep the likes of Enrique. Such reinforcement can of course be young too, but it's a difference between being in early-mid 20s and a teenager like Wickham. That's many years separating them in experience.  It's not before we've managed to secure sufficient depth in our squad and on regular basis are pushing for an European spot that we can begin to hunt  the hottest youngsters..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest thenorthumbrian

Why is the argument that we should sign young players that will bring in a profit when we sell them ?

Here is a an idea, why not sign young players and keep them to try and build a good team ?

Who knows, one day we might have a team capable of competing with the best.   

 

 

That's not my main argument actually. I'm all pro when it comes to buying the young and promising. But right now, I want to focus on signing players that will strengthen our first team right away. It's those buys that are important if we want to keep the likes of Enrique. Such reinforcement can of course be young too, but it's a difference between being in early-mid 20s and a teenager like Wickham. That's many years separating them in experience.  It's not before we've managed to secure sufficient depth in our squad and on regular basis are pushing for an European spot that we can begin to hunt  the hottest youngsters..

 

Fair enough, mind you there it is unlikely that Connor Whickham would look twice at United.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...