Guest bimpy474 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is shite by the way on many things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 OptaJoe Opta Sports 13 - Charlie Adam has now been shown 13 PL cards (12Y, 1R) since the start of 2010-11, only Cheik Tioté has seen more (16Y). Bruising. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Some nasty tackles going in here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raising your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. It stopped Parker in his strides, and was ugly. You can't deny that. A yellow card is very fair. If it's a dangerous high foot it's still a foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 David Pleat says he's spoken to Modric's dentist and the dentist says that Modric is fully focused on the football this season. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is shite by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Gareth Bale is awesome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 David Pleat says he's spoken to Modric's dentist and the dentist says that Modric is fully focused on the football this season. :lol: Whaa? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Carroll on the left? Daglish has lost the plot Must have surely, it had to be Suarez on the left and the big Carroll alone up front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sydneycove Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. Not with studs up. You're not allowed to raise your leg with studs up? So in the game of football you can only raise your leg in a certain way? Comes under dangerous play. Lucky it was only a second yellow to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raising your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. It stopped Parker in his strides, and was ugly. You can't deny that. A yellow card is very fair. If it's a dangerous high foot it's still a foul. Going of what Bimpy said if there doesn't have to be intent fair enough, but he didn't have a clue that Parker was behind him, calling it ugly implies there was intent behind the action. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Carroll ends up being nowhere near the penalty area when they are in position to cross it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Spend £35m on 6ft4" striker, plays him on the wing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is s**** by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow. Thats why the rules are cack, intent, no intent its crap, the refs aren't allowed to use Discretion, if they were we wouldn't have this intent/no intent stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 I've said all along that Dalglish will only ever provide team spirit and fan support, he will never have the tactical capabilities to battle with the top four. Today: Skrtel vs Bale Carroll moved to the left (after sending off) Both very poor decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Spend £35m on 6ft4" striker, plays him on the wing. It's almost as funny as Heskey playing on the wing against us last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Almost another Red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Was a booking like, doesn't really matter whether there is intent when you stud someone that high up. It was just clumsy more than anything. Didn't see the first booking mind you. It's very difficult to want either team to win this, but I reckon Tottenham are my preference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sydneycove Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 How long till Liverpool are down to 9? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Thought he got the ball at first... but not at all. Good call from the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is s**** by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow. Thats why the rules are cack, intent, no intent its crap, the refs aren't allowed to use Discretion, if they were we wouldn't have this intent/no intent stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Should have been a red, ofcourse he was denying a goalscoring opportunity Smith you thick twat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raising your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. It stopped Parker in his strides, and was ugly. You can't deny that. A yellow card is very fair. If it's a dangerous high foot it's still a foul. Going of what Bimpy said if there doesn't have to be intent fair enough, but he didn't have a clue that Parker was behind him, calling it ugly implies there was intent behind the action. I've done the ref's course and its mind boggling, some of its so straight forward but some is just stupid, i mean really stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Spur's pace is doing Liverpool in shame they can't do anything with the free's they're getting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there. That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is s**** by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow. Thats why the rules are cack, intent, no intent its crap, the refs aren't allowed to use Discretion, if they were we wouldn't have this intent/no intent stuff. I agree in theory, but the problem is, allowing the ref to use discretion relies upon referees having a clue about the intricacies of playing the game. I'm not sure I'd trust any of the referees to really use their discretion right now tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts