Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People say he can't deal with the physical players as well, so what's Benteke if he isn't physical and isn't pacey? I'd have him over Long any day of the week. Jelavic and Long are in good form, posing a good partnership threat since their arrival and it should be a good battle. Colo and Williamson will have to be on their game but I'm not fearing their two strikers, we pose just as much threat with Remy, if not more of a threat.

 

Their forwards are in good form, but it's their central midfield I worry about. Livermore and Huddlestone are bossing it at the moment, and we really should be playing with 3 in the middle to get the best out of Anita, and have a go at their 3 at the back.

 

Aye, got to say Brucey has done a very good job and made some very astute signings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People say he can't deal with the physical players as well, so what's Benteke if he isn't physical and isn't pacey? I'd have him over Long any day of the week. Jelavic and Long are in good form, posing a good partnership threat since their arrival and it should be a good battle. Colo and Williamson will have to be on their game but I'm not fearing their two strikers, we pose just as much threat with Remy, if not more of a threat.

 

Their forwards are in good form, but it's their central midfield I worry about. Livermore and Huddlestone are bossing it at the moment, and we really should be playing with 3 in the middle to get the best out of Anita, and have a go at their 3 at the back.

 

Aye, got to say Brucey has done a very good job and made some very astute signings.

 

 

:ben:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor b****** always gets brought up when I'm around  :lol: bless the c***  :aww:

 

He is dirty but him and Huth have been fairly solid over the years for Stoke. We've lacked someone with that sort of physicality for a long time. If it means a couple of leg breaks or cheap shots down the line, so be it  ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a slight better version of Williamson given that he is a bit more aggressive but would cost the best part of £10m. He was protected by Pulis' ultra neg style, he's been poor this season and was merked by Zlatan for England.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Petty as fuck, that. And about as relevant as Shawcross getting 'merked' by a great striker in one game.

 

 

 

Conveniently ignore the main point but I'm bored so I'll reply...

 

He played a game against a top stiker, was left open and got utterly embarrassed because he is limited when he wasn't protected - as well you knew I meant. You'll note Stoke have shipped loads of goals this season for the same reason - even more than our collection of jokers who aside from Taylor are only worthy of criticism from yourself despite Shawcross' fine marshalling.

 

If you think he "certainly wouldn't cost the earth for a CB who'd be equally valuable." (to replace Coloccini) you must be dafter than I give you credit for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll ignore the absurd Taylor comment, but nice try. I've already conceded more than once that Shawcross is out of our price range.

 

I'm not even going to touch the fact that Stoke have shipped goals under Mark Hughes. Man City were conceding 3 at home to the likes of Burnley, Bolton and Sunderland with that idiot in charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely shoving of words in to the mouth, well played.

 

My agenda is

He's a slight better version of Williamson given that he is a bit more aggressive but would cost the best part of £10m. He was protected by Pulis' ultra neg style, he's been poor this season and was merked by Zlatan for England.

and

He played a game against a top stiker, was left open and got utterly embarrassed because he is limited when he wasn't protected - as well you knew I meant. You'll note Stoke have shipped loads of goals this season for the same reason, despite Shawcross' fine marshalling.

 

You seem to think he's a good player, I don't.

 

Saying that if someone knew about agendas it would be...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Disco here tbf, never been very impressed by Shawcross and for the price that have been mentioned about him I wouldn't get close to him either. But then again, I don't watch Stoke v Hull, Stoke v Cardiff and so on, so what would I know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's better than what we have and i would like him but he would cost too much.

 

Never going to happen so not much point in discussing it, saying that... we got 8 pages worth of bullshit in the Glenn Hoddle for DOF thread so anything is possible :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never left stoke for anyone better.  All he's got going for him is he's a bit of a prick who'll put in a heavy tackle. Wouldn't want him anywhere near us personally. The very definition of average. And I'm not a fan of players who snap other players legs. I hate stoke and certainly don't want anyone they rate playing for us

 

That's just ridiculous  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Never left stoke for anyone better.  All he's got going for him is he's a bit of a prick who'll put in a heavy tackle. Wouldn't want him anywhere near us personally. The very definition of average. And I'm not a fan of players who snap other players legs. I hate stoke and certainly don't want anyone they rate playing for us

 

That's just ridiculous  :lol:

 

:lol: you seen their squad? They like Jon Walters FFS! They aren't exactly know for having anyone remotely decent

 

Their keeper is highly regarded. I'm not saying they have players all over the shop but if Stoke rate a player doesn't mean to say i wouldn't take them. Huddlestone could have quite easily been playing for them had he not failed a medical and i'm a fan of his for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colo has regressed the past two or three years.  However on his day he can produce fab performances as yesterday. And we look far better with him in the side.

 

2-3 years? It's only 2 yars ago he was in team of the season for the PL is it not?

 

:lol: :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...